Production Complementarity and Investment Incentives: Does Asset Ownership Matter?

Mumcu, Ayse (2006): Production Complementarity and Investment Incentives: Does Asset Ownership Matter? Unpublished.

Abstract

This paper analyzes the role of the initial allocation of ownership rights in transactions where parties make relationship-specific investments and contracts are incomplete. If there is high mutual dependence in production, the initial allocation of ownership rights is irrelevant. This result contrasts with Grossman and Hart (1986), who, using a similar model, obtain that the ownership rights should be allocated to minimize ex-ante inefficiencies in production and assets should be owned by the party whose investment is most productive. The critical element behind these two different results is that while Grossman and Hart (1986) model uses the Nash bargaining solution treating status quo payoffs as disagreement points, here they are treated as outside options. The model also shows that, when relevant, asset ownership may provide disincentive to invest.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Institution: Bogazici University
• Language: English
• Keywords: organizational behaviour; transaction costs; property rights
• Subjects: L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L22 - Firm Organization and Market Structure: Markets vs. Hierarchies; Vertical Integration; Conglomerates; Subsidiaries; D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D23 - Organizational Behavior; Transaction Costs; Property Rights

References

Binmore, K., A. Shaked, and J. Sutton. (1989), "An Outside Option Experiment," Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104, 751-770.

Bolton, P., and M. Whinston. (1993), "Incomplete Contracts, Vertical Integration, and Supply Assurance," Review of Economic Studies, 60, 121-148.

Chiu, Y. S. "Non-cooperative Bargaining, Hostages and Optimal Asset Ownership," American Economic Review, 88, 4, 882-903.

De Meza, D., and B. Lockwood. (1998), "Does Asset Ownership Always Motivate Managers? Outside Options and the Property Rights Theory of the Firm," Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 361-386.

Fernandez, R., and J. Glazer. (1991), "Striking a Bargain Between Two Completely Informed Agents," American Economic Review, 81, 240-252.

Hart, O. (1995), Firms, Contracts, and Financial Structure of the Firm. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Hart, O., and J. Moore. (1990), "Property Rights and the Nature of the Firm," Journal of Political Economy 98, 1119-1158.

Holmstrom, B. and J. Roberts. (1998), "The Boundaries of the Firm Revisited," Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12, 4, 73-94.

Holmstrom, B., and J. Tirole. (1989), "The Theory of the Firm," in Schmalansee, R. and Willig, R. (eds.). Handbook of Industrial Organization Vol.1. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.

Grossman, S., and Hart, O. (1986), "The Cost and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration," Journal of Political Economy, 94, 691-719.

Sutton, J. (1986), "Non-cooperative Bargaining Theory: An Introduction," Review of Economic Studies, 53, 709-724.

Shaked, A., and J. Sutton. (1984), "Involuntary Unemployment as a Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model," Econometrica, 52, 1351-1364.

Whinston, M. (2001), "Assessing the Property Rights and Transaction-Cost Theories of Firm Scope," American Economic Review, (Papers and Proceedings), 91, 2, 184-188.