Quesada, Antonio (2009): Allocation of objects with conditional property rights. Unpublished.
Full text available as:
| PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader 182Kb |
This paper considers the allocation of indivisible goods among members of a collective assuming that individuals are given the right to retain certain goods when some individuals alter the allocation problem. The assignment of rights is exhaustive in that, for every good x, either individual i can exercise a right over x against j or j against i. It is shown that the only Pareto efficient allocation rules satisfying these requirements are those having a hierarchy of diarchies.
| Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Keywords: | Allocation rule; hierarchy of diarchies; indivisible good; property right. |
| Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D70 - General D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D61 - Allocative Efficiency; Cost-Benefit Analysis |
| ID Code: | 19469 |
| Deposited By: | Antonio Quesada |
| Deposited On: | 22. Dec 2009 07:15 |
| Last Modified: | 23. Dec 2009 09:09 |
| References: | Ehlers, L. (2002): “Coalitional strategy-proof house allocation”, Journal of Economic Theory 105, 298-317. Ehlers, L. and B. Klaus (2003): “Resource-monotonicity for house allocation problems”, International Journal of Game Theory 32, 545-560. Ergin, H. İ. (2000): “Consistency in house allocation problems”, Journal of Mathematical Economics 34, 77-97. Kamijo, Y. and R. Kawasaki (2009): “Dynamics, stability, and foresight in the Shapley-Scarf housing market”, Fondazione Enrico Mattei Working Paper 312. Pápai, S. (2000): “Strategyproof assignment by hierarchical exchange”, Econometrica 68, 1403-1433. Pápai, S. (2007): “Exchange in a general market of indivisible goods”, Journal of Economic Theory 132, 208-235. Shapley, L. and H. Scarf (1974): “On cores and indivisibility”, Journal of Mathematical Economics 1, 23-37. Svensson, L.-G. (1999): “Strategy-proof allocation of indivisible goods”, Social Choice and Welfare 16, 556-567. |
All papers reproduced by permission. Reproduction and distribution subject to the approval of the copyright owners.
Repository Staff Only: edit this item