Gaudeul, Alexia (2008): Consumer welfare and market structure in a model of competition between open source and proprietary software.
Download (781Kb) | Preview
I consider a Vickrey-Salop model of spatial product differentiation with quasi-linear utility functions and contrast two modes of production, the proprietary model where entrepreneurs sell software to the users, and the open source model where users participate in software development. I show that the OS model of production may be more efficient from the point of view of welfare that the proprietary model, but that an OS industry is vulnerable to entry by entrepreneurs while a proprietary industry can resist entry by OS projects. A mixed industry where OS and proprietary development methods coexist may exhibit large OS projects cohabiting with more specialized proprietary projects, and is more efficient than the proprietary model of production from the point of view of welfare.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Consumer welfare and market structure in a model of competition between open source and proprietary software|
|Keywords:||open source; proprietary; software industry; copyright; non-profit organization; mixed market; welfare; spatial product differentiation|
|Subjects:||L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L17 - Open Source Products and Markets
O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Technological Change; Research and Development; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H44 - Publicly Provided Goods: Mixed Markets
|Depositing User:||Alexia Gaudeul|
|Date Deposited:||25. Dec 2009 08:13|
|Last Modified:||18. Feb 2013 19:17|
ALESINA, A., AND E. SPOLAORE (1997): “The number and size of nations,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1027–1056.
BALLOU, J. P. (2005): “An Examination of the Presence of Ownership Effects in Mixed Markets,” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 21(1), 228–255.
BERGSTROM, T., L. BLUME, AND H. VARIAN (1986): “On the Private Provision of Public Goods,” Journal of Public Economics, 29(1), 25–49.
BESLEY, T., AND M. GHATAK (2001): “Government Versus Private Ownership Of Public Goods,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(4), 1343–1372.
BESSEN, J. (2006): “Open source software: Free provision of complex public goods,” in The economics of open source software development, ed. by J. Bitzer, and P. J. H. Schröder, pp.57–81. Elsevier: Amsterdam.
BEZROUKOV, N. (1999): “Open Source Software Development as a Special Type of Academic Research (Critique of Vulgar Raymondism),” First Monday, 4(10).
BITZER, J. (2004): “Commercial versus open source software: the role of product heterogeneity in competition,” Economic Systems, 28, 369–381.
BITZER, J., AND P. J. H. SCHRÖDER (2006): “The impact of entry and competition by open source software on innovation activity,” in The Economics of Open Source Software Development,ed. by J. Bitzer, and P. J. H. Schröder, pp. 219–246. Elsevier: Amsterdam.
BONACCORSI, A., AND C. ROSSI (2006): “Comparing Motivations of Individual Programmers and Firms to Take Part in the Open Source Movement: From Community to Business,” Knowledge, Technology, and Policy, 18(4), 40–64.
BRAID, R. M. (2004): “Uneven spacing in free-entry equilibrium for spatial product differentiation,” Economics Letters, 84(2), 155–161.
BRHLIKOVA, P. (2004): “Models of competition between one for profit and one non profit firm,” CERGE-EI Working Paper no. 240.
BRHLIKOVA, P. (2006): “Mixed Competition and Welfare Under Various Nonprofit Objectives // Mixed Competition Under Various Cost Configurations,” CERGE-EI Working Paper No. 310.
CASADESUS-MASANELL, R., AND P. GHEMAWAT (2006): “Dynamic mixed duopoly: A model motivated by Linux vs. Windows,” Management Science, 52(7), 1072–1085.
COMINO, S., AND F. M. MANENTI (2005): “Government Policies Supporting Open Source Software for the Mass Market,” Review of Industrial Organization, 26(2), 217–240.
DARMON, E., T. LE TEXIER, AND D. TORRE (2006): “Commercial or Open Source Software? Winner-Takes-All Competition, Partial Adoption and Efficiency,” Discussion paper, University of Nice-Sophia Antipolis, CREA and University of Rennes.
ECONOMIDES, N., AND E. KATSAMAKAS (2006): “Two-sided competition of proprietary vs. open source technology platforms and the implications for the software industry,” Management Science, 52(7), 1057–1071.
EPPLE, D., AND R. E. ROMANO (1998): “Competition Between Private and Public Schools, Vouchers and Peer-Group Effects,” American Economic Review, 88(1), 33–62.
FERSHTMAN, C., AND N. GANDAL (2004): “The Determinants of Output per Contributor in Open Source Projects: An Empirical Examination,” Discussion paper, Tel-Aviv University, Michigan State University, and CEPR.
FRANKE, N., AND E. VON HIPPEL (2003): “Satisfying heterogeneous user needs via innovation toolkits: the case of Apache security software,” Research Policy, Special Issue on Open Source Software, 32(7), 1199–1215.
FREY, B. S. (1999): “State Support and Creativity in the Arts: Some New Considerations,” Journal of Cultural Economics, 23(1), 71–85.
GAUDEUL, A. (2003): “The LATEX project: A case study of open-source software,” TUGBoat, 24(1), 66–79.
GAUDEUL, A. (2005): “Public Provision of a Private Good: What is the Point of the BSD License?,” SSRN eLibrary, http://ssrn.com/paper=933631.
GAUDEUL, A. (2007): “Do Open Source Developers Respond to Competition?: The LATEX case study,” Review of Network Economics, 6(2), 239–263.
GAUDEUL, A. (2008): “Open Source Licensing in Mixed Markets, or Why Open Source Software Does Not Succeed,” CCP Working Paper No. 08-2.
GAUDEUL, A., L. MATHIEU, AND C. PERONI (2008): “Blogs or the economics of reciprocal (in)attention,” Discussion paper, School of Economics and ESRC Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia, Norwich.
GLAESER, E. L. (2002): “The governance of not-for-profit firms,” Harvard Institute of Economic Research, Paper No. 1954.
HARISON, E., AND H. KOSKI (2008): “Does open innovation foster productivity? Evidence from open source software firms,” Discussion paper 1135, University of Groningen and ETLA.
HEALY, K., AND A. SCHUSSMAN (2003): “The Ecology of Open-Source Software Development,” Discussion paper, Department of Sociology, University of Arizona.
JOHNSON, J. P. (2002): “Open Source Software: Private Provision of a Public Good,” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 11(4), 637–662.
KLINCEWICZ, K. (2005): “Innovativeness of open source software projects,” Discussion paper, Tokyo Institute of Technology and Warsaw University.
KRISHNAMURTHY, S. (2002): “Cave or Community?: An Empirical Examination of 100 Mature Open Source Projects,” First Monday, 7(6).
KUAN, J. (2002): “Open Source Software as Lead User’s Make or Buy Decision: A study of Open and Closed Source Quality,” Discussion paper, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
LAKHANI, K., AND E. VON HIPPEL (2003): “How open source software works: “free” user-to-user assistance,” Research Policy, 32(6), 923–943.
LAMBARDI, G. D. (2007): “Code development: Open vs. proprietary source,” Discussion paper, GREMAQ, University of Toulouse.
LEONCINI, R., F. RENTOCCHINI, AND G. V. MARZETTI (2008): “You won the battle. What about the war? A model of competition between proprietary and open source software,” University of Trento, Discussion paper 2008.11.
MOCKUS, A., R. T. FIELDING, AND J. D. HERBSLEB (2005): “Two case studies of open source software development: Apache and Mozilla,” in Perspectives on free and open source software, ed. by J. Feller, B. Fitzgerald, S. A. Hissam, and K. R. Lakhani, chap. 10, pp. 163–210. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
MUSTONEN, M. (2005): “When Does a Firm Support Substitute Open Source Programming?,” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 14(1), 121–139.
O’MAHONY, S. (2005): “Non-Profit Foundations and their Role in Community-Firm Software Collaboration,” in Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software, ed. by J. Feller, B. Fitzgerald, S. A. Hissam, and K. R. Lakhani, chap. 20, pp. 393–414. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
PROPPER, C., AND K. GREEN (2001): “A Larger Role for the Private Sector in Financing UK Health Care: the Arguments and the Evidence,” Journal of Social Policy, 30(4), 685–704.
RAYMOND, E. (2001): The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary. O’Reilly Media, Inc.
RAYNES-GOLDIE, K. (2004): “Pulling sense out of today’s informational chaos: LiveJournal as a site of knowledge creation and sharing,” First Monday, 9(12).
ROSE-ACKERMAN, S. (1990): “Competition between non-profits and for-profits: entry and growth,” Voluntas, 1(1), 13–25.
SALOP, S. (1979): “Monopolistic competition with outside goods,” Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 141–156.
SCHMIDT, K. M., AND M. SCHNITZER (2003): “Public Subsidies for Open-Source? Some Economic Policy Issues of the Software Market,” Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 16(2), 473–505.
SEN, R. (2007): “A strategic analysis of competition between open source and proprietary software,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 233–257.
SLOAN, F. A. (2000): “Not-for-profit ownership and hospital behavior,” in Handbook of Health Economics, ed. by A. Culyer, and J. Newhouse, chap. 21, pp. 1141–1174. Elsevier Science B.V.
UNESCO INSTITUTE FOR STATISTICS (2007): “What do societies invest in education? Public versus private spending,” UIS/FS/07/04.
VICKREY, W. (1964): Microstatics. Harcourt, Brace and World: New York, USA.
VICKREY, W. S. (1999): “Spatial competition, monopolistic competition, and optimum product diversity,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 17(7), 953–963, with foreword by S.P. Anderson and R.M. Braid.
VON ENGELHARDT, S., AND S. SWAMINATHAN (2008): “Open source software, closed source software or both: Impacts on industry growth and the role of intellectual property rights,” Discussion paper 799, FSU Jena and DIW Berlin.
VON HIPPEL, E., AND G. VON KROGH (2003): “Open Source Software and the “Private-Collective” Innovation model: Issues for Organization Science,” Organization Science, 14(2), 209–223.
WICHMANN, T. (2002): “Firms’ open source activities: Motivations and policy implications,” Free/Libre and Open Source Software Final Report, Part II, International Institute of Infonomics.