McCloskey, Deirdre (2009): Foreign Trade Was Not an Engine of Growth.
Download (405kB) | Preview
Trade reshuffles. No wonder, then, that it doesn’t work as an engine of growth—not for explaining the scale of growth that overcame the West and then the Rest 1800 to the present. Yet many historians, such as Walt Rostow or Robert Allen or Joseph Inikori, have put foreign trade at the center of their accounts. Yet the Rest had been vigorously trading in the Indian Ocean long before the Europeans got there—indeed, that’s why the West wanted to get there. Trade certainly set the prices that British industrialists faced, such as the price of wheat or the interest rate. But new trade does not put people to work, unless they start unemployed. If they are, then any source of demand, such as the demand for domestic service, would be as important as the India trade. Foreign trade is not a net gain, but a way of producing importables at the sacrifice of exportables. The Harberger point implies that static gains from trade are small beside the 1500% of growth to be explained, or even the 100% in the first century in Britain. Trade is anyway too old and too widespread to explain a uniquely European—even British—event. One can appeal to “dynamic” effects, but these too can be shown to be small, even in the case of the gigantic British cotton textile industry. And if small causes lead to large consequences, the model is instable, and any old thing can cause it to tip. Ronald Findlay and Kevin O’Rourke favor foreign trade on the argument that power led to plenty. But domination is not the same thing as innovation. In short, the production possibility curve did not move out just a little, as could be explained by trade or investment or reshuffling. It exploded, and requires an economics of discovery, not an economics of routine exchanges of cotton textiles for tea.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Foreign Trade Was Not an Engine of Growth|
|Keywords:||foreign trade; engines of growth; industrial revolution; economic growth, Britain|
|Subjects:||B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925 > B10 - General
N - Economic History > N1 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics; Industrial Structure; Growth; Fluctuations > N10 - General, International, or Comparative
|Depositing User:||Susan MacDonald|
|Date Deposited:||05. Jan 2010 11:43|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 11:28|
Allen, Robert C. 2006. “The British Industrial Revolution in Global Perspective: How Commerce Created the Industrial Revolution and Modern Economic Growth.” Unpublished paper Nuffield College, Oxford University. At http://www.nuffield.ox.ac.uk/users/allen/ unpublished/econinvent-3.pdf
Balassa, Bela. 1981. The Process of Industrial Development and Alternative Development Strategies. Princeton University, Department of Economics, International Finance Section.
Berg, Maxine, and Patricia Hudson. 1994. “Growth and Change: A Comment on the Crafts-Harley View of the Industrial Revolution.” Economic History Review 47: 147-149.
Bernhofen, Daniel M., and John C. Brown. 2009. “Testing the General Validity of the Heckscher-Ohlin Theorem: The Natural Experiment of Japan.” Unpublished paper Hi-Stat, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University, Tokyo. At http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hst:ghsdps:gd09-058&r=his
Braudel, Fernand, and Frank Spooner. 1967. “Prices in Europe from 1450 to 1750.” Pp. 378-486 in Rich, E. E., and Wilson, C. H., eds. The Cambridge Economic History of Europe, vol. IV: The Economy of Expanding Europe in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chartres, John. 2003. “England: Early Modern Period.” In Mokyr, ed., Oxford Encyclopedia of Economic History.
Chenery, Hollis B. 1960. “Patterns of Industrial Growth.” American Economic Review 50: 624-654.
Crafts, N. F. R. 2004 (2005). “The First Industrial Revolution: Resolving the Slow Growth/Rapid Industrialization Paradox.” Journal of the European Economic Association 3(April/May): 525-534. Manuscript, London School of Economics. At http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/ economicHistory /pdf/First%20Industrial%20Reveloution%20-%20NFRC.pdf
Crafts, Nicholas F. R., and C. Knick Harley. 1992. “Output Growth and the British Industrial Revolution: a Restatement of the Crafts-Harley View." Economic History Review 45: 703-730.
Crafts, Nicholas F. R., and C. Knick Harley. 2004. “Precocious British Industrialization: A General Equilibrium Perspective." In British Exceptionalism: a Unique Path to the Industrial Revolution, edited by Leandro Prados de la Escosura. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crafts, Nicholas F. R., S. J. Leybourne, and T. C. Mills. 1991. "Chapter 7: Britain." Pp. 109-152 in Richard Sylla and Gianni Toniolo, eds., Patterns of European Industrialization: The Nineteenth Century. London: Routledge, and Fondazione Adriano Olivetti.
Dandekar V. M. 1966. “Transforming Traditional Agriculture: A Critique of Professor Schultz.” Economic and Political Weekl y 1(1):25–36.
Daudin, Guillaume. 2004. Commerce et Prospérité: La France au le XVIIIe Siècle. Paris: PUPS.
Daudin, Guillaume. 2008. “Domestic Trade and Market Size in Late Eighteenth-Century France.” Oxford Economic and Social History Working Papers. de Vries, Jan. 2003. “Long-Distance Trade between 1500 and 1750.” In Mokyr, ed., Oxford Encyclopedia of Economic History.
Deane, Phyllis., and W. A. Cole. 1962. British Economic Growth, 1688 1959. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Findlay, Ronald, and Kevin H. O’Rourke. 2007. Power and Plenty: Trade, War, and the World Economy in the Second Millennium. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Flynn, Dennis O. 1996. World Silver and Monetary History in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries (Collected Studies Series). Aldershot: Ashgate/Variorum Press.
Flynn, Dennis O. and Arturo Giráldez. 1995b. “Arbitrage, China, and World Trade in the Early Modern Period.” Journal of the Social and Economic History of the Orient 38: 429–448.
Flynn, Dennis O. and Arturo Giráldez. 1995a. “Born with a Silver Spoon: The Origin of World Trade in 1571.” Journal of World History 6: 201–221.
Flynn, Dennis O., and Arturo Giráldez. 2002. “Cycles of Silver: Global Economic Unity Through the Mid-18th Century.” Journal of World History 13 (2): 391-427.
Flynn, Dennis O., and Arturo Giráldez. 2004. “Path Dependence, Time Lags and the Birth of Globalisation: A Critique of O’Rourke and Williamson.” European Review of Economic History 8: 81-108.
Flynn, Dennis O., Arturo Giráldez, and R. von Glahn, eds. 2003. Monetary History in Global Perspective, 1500-1808. Aldershot: Variorum.
Fogel, Robert W. 1964. Railroads and American Economic Growth: Essays in Econometric History. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Foreman-Peck, James. 2003. “Long Distance Trade: Long-Distance Trade since 1914.” In Mokyr, ed., Oxford Encyclopedia of Economic History.
Frank, Andre Gunder. 1998. Reorient: Global Economy in the Asian Age. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press
Gilomee, Hermann, and Bernard Mbenga, eds. 2007. New History of South Africa. Cape Town: Tafelberg.
Goldstone, Jack A. 2002a. “The Rise of the West—or Not? A Revision to Socio-economic History.” Sociological Theory 18 (2): 175-194.
Goldstone, Jack A. 2009. Why Europe? The Rise of the West in World History, 1500-1850. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hirschman, Albert. O. 1958. The Strategy of Economic Development. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Hudson, Patricia, ed. 1989. Regions and Industries: A Perspective on Britain’s Industrial Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hume, David. 1777 (1987). Essays Moral, Political and Literary. E. F. Miller, ed. Revised edition. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
Hynes, William, David S. Jacks, Kevin H. O’Rourke. 2009. “Commodity Market Disintegration in the Interwar Period.” Institute for International Integration Studies. Discussion paper 285. Trinity College, Dublin. At http://www.tcd.ie/iiis/documents/discussion/pdfs/iiisdp285.pdf
Imlah, J. A. H. 1958. Economic Elements in the Pax Britannica: Studies in British Foreign Trade in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Inikori, Joseph E. 2002. Africans and the Industrial Revolution in England: A Study in International Trade and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ippolito, R. A. 1975. “The Effect of the Agricultural Depression on Industrial Demand in England: 1730 1750.” Economics 2: 298 312.
Jordan, Miriam. 1998. “Foreign Rivals Spur India's Homegrown Firms.” International Herald Tribune. Feb. 5.
Kennedy, Paul. 1976 (2006). The Rise and Fall of British Naval Mastery. Amherst, N.Y. : Humanity Books, 2006.
Machlup, Fritz. 1963 (1975). Essays in Economic Semantics. New York: New York University Press, 1975.
Marx, Karl. 1846. “Letter [on Proudhon, in French] to Pavel Yasilyevich Annenkov.” December 28, trans. Peter and Betty Ross, Marx Engels Collected Works Vol 38, p. 95, reproduced at http://www.marxists.org/archive/ marx/works/1846/letters/46_12_28.htm
McCloskey, Deirdre N. 1975b. “Review of Williamson's Late Nineteenth-Century American Development.” Times Literary Supplement (Dec 12).
McCloskey, Deirdre N. 1980. "Magnanimous Albion: Free Trade and British National Income, 1841-1881." Explorations in Economic History 17 (July): 303-320. Reprinted in Forrest Capie, ed. Protectionism in the World Economy (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1992).
McCloskey, Deirdre N. 1981. “The Industrial Revolution, 1780-1860: A Survey.” Chapter 6 in Floud and McCloskey eds., The Economic History of Britain, 1700-Present (1981), Vol. 1, pp. 103-127, reprinted in J. Mokyr, ed. Economic History and the Industrial Revolution (Rowman and Littlefield, 1985).
McCloskey, Deirdre N., and J. Richard Zecher. 1984. “The Success of Purchasing Power Parity: Historical Evidence and Its Implications for Macroeconomics.” Pp. 121-150 in Michael Bordo and Anna J. Schwartz, eds., A Retrospective on the Classical Gold Standard 1821-1931. National Bureau of Economic Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mitchell, Brian, with the assistance of Phyllis Deane. 1962. Abstract of British Historical Statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mokyr, Joel, ed. 2003. The Oxford Encyclopedia of Economic History. Six volumes. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press
Mokyr, Joel. 1990. The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mokyr, Joel. 1999a. “Editor’s Introduction: The New Economic History and the Industrial Revolution.” Pp. 1-131 in Joel Mokyr, ed., The British Industrial Revolution: An Economic Perspective. Boulder: Westview Press.
Mokyr, Joel. 2002. The Gifts of Athena: Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Mokyr, Joel. 2003. “Industrial Revolution.” In Mokyr, ed., Oxford Encyclopedia of Economic History.
Mokyr, Joel. 2007a. “The European Enlightenment, the Industrial Revolution, and Modern Economic Growth.” Max Weber Lecture, European University Institute, Bellagio, March 27, 2007. At http://faculty.wcas.northwestern.edu/~jmokyr/Florence-Weber.PDF
Mokyr, Joel. 2007b. “Discussion of Clark’s Farewell to Alms. ” Meet-the-Author Session at the Social Science History Convention, Chicago, November. http://eh.net/bookreviews /ssha_farewell_to_alms.pdf
Neal, Larry. 1990. The Rise of Financial Capitalism: International Capital Markets in the Age of Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O'Brien, Patrick K., and Leandro Prados de la Escosura. 1999. “Balance Sheets for the Acquisition, Retention and Loss of European Empires Overseas.” Itinerario 23: 25-52.
O'Rourke, Kevin H., Leandro Prados de la Escosura, and Guilllaume Daudin. 2008. “Trade and Empire, 1700-1870.” Unpublished paper Institute for International Integration Studies. Available at http://www.tcd.ie/ iiis/documents/discussion/pdfs/iiisdp249.pdf
Overton, Mark. 1996. Agricultural Revolution in England: The Transformation of the Agrarian Economy 1500-1850. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Özmucur, Süleyman, and Şevket Pamuk. 2007. “Did European Commodity Prices Converge during 1500-1800?” Pp. 59-85 in T. J. Hatton, K. O’Rourke, and A. M. Taylor, eds., The New Comparative Economic History: Essays in Honor of Jeffrey G. Williamson. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Pollard, Sidney. 1964. “Fixed Capital in the Industrial Revolution.” Journal of Economic History 24: 299 314.
Pomeranz, Kenneth, and Steven Topik. 2006. The World That Trade Created: Society, Culture, and the World Economy 1400 to the Present. London, and Armonk, New York: M. E. Sharpe.
Pooley, Colin G. 1989. “Segregation or Integration? The Residential Experience of the Irish in Mid-Victorian Britain.” Pp. 60-83 in R. Swift and S. Gilley, eds., The Irish in Britain, 1815-1939. London: Rowman and Littlefield.
Prados de la Escosura, Leandro. 1993. “La Pérdida del Imperio y Sus Consecuencias Económicas.” In Prados de la Escosura and S. Amaral, eds. La Independencia America: Consecuencias Económicas. Madrid: Alianza.
Richardson, Philip. 1989. “The Structure of Capital during the Industrial Revolution Revisited: Two Case Studies from the Cotton Textile Industry.” Economic History Review 42: 484 503.
Schultz, Theodore W. 1964. Transforming Traditional Agriculture. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Sen, Amartya. 1967. “Surplus Labor in India: A Critique of Schultz’s Statistical Test.” Economic Journal 77: 154-161.
Temin, Peter. 1997. “Two Views of the British Industrial Revolution." Journal of Economic History 57: 63-82. Turner, Michael E., J. V. Beckett and B. Afton. 2001. Farm Production in England 1700-1914. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Williamson, Jeffrey G. 1987. “Did English Factor Markets Fail During the Industrial Revolution?” Oxford Economic Papers 39: 641 78.
Williamson, Jeffrey G. 1975. Late Nineteenth-Century American Development: A General Equilibrium History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ziliak, Stephen, and Deirdre McCloskey. 2008. The Cult of Statistical Significance: How the Standard Error Costs Us Jobs, Justice, and Lives. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.