Munich Personal RePEc Archive
Login | Create Account

Bonds futures and their options: more than the cheapest-to-deliver; quality option and marginning

Henrard, Marc (2006): Bonds futures and their options: more than the cheapest-to-deliver; quality option and marginning. Unpublished.

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
383Kb

Abstract

Even if the name futures indicates a simple instrument, bond futures are complex. Several special features are embedded in the instrument. In particular the future is not written on one specific bond but on a basket of bonds, from which the short side can deliver the cheapest. This paper focuses on that feature, present in the main futures market, and its impact on the futures risk. A formula for the delivery option and the convexity adjustment due to the daily margining is proposed in the Gaussian HJM model. The approach is numerically very efficient and easy to implement. Based on this result a futures option formula is derived. The approach is similar to the one used for Canary swaptions.

Item Type:MPRA Paper
Additional Information:Part of the material of this work was presented at the Numerical methods in Finance seminar at INRIA Rocquencourt, France in February 2006. AMS mathematics subject classification: 91B28, 91B24, 91B70 The views expressed here are those of the author and not necessarily those of the Bank for International Settlements.
Language:English
Keywords:Bond future; option on bond futures; delivery option; marginning; Gaussian HJM model; explicit formula; numerical integration
Subjects:G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G13 - Contingent Pricing; Futures Pricing
E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates > E43 - Determination of Interest Rates; Term Structure of Interest Rates
ID Code:2001
Deposited By:Marc Henrard
Deposited On:05. Mar 2007
Last Modified:28. Jul 2011 15:58
References:

Foreign exchange and derivative market activity in 2004. Triennial central bank survey, BIS.

Brody, D.C. and Hughston, L.P. (2004). Chaos and coherence: a new framework for interest-rate modelling. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A., 460:85-110.

Burghardt, G.D., Belton, T.M., Lane, M., and Papa, J. (2005). The Treasury Bond Basis. Library of investment and finance. McGraw-Hill, third edition.

Carr, P. and Chen, R.-R. (1997). Valuing bond futures and the quality option. Technical report.

Carverhill, A. (1994). When is the short rate Markovian. Mathematical Finance, 4(4):305--312.

Grieves, R. and Marcus, A.J. (2005). Delivery option and treasury-bond futures hedge ratios. Journal of Derivatives, pages 70--76.

Heath, D., Jarrow, R., and Morton, A. (1992). Bond pricing and the term structure of interest rates: a new methodology for contingent claims valuation. Econometrica, 60(1):77--105.

Henrard, M. (2003). Explicit bond option and swaption formula in Heath-Jarrow-Morton one-factor model. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 6(1):57-72.

Henrard, M. (2004). Semi-explicit delta and gamma for European swaptions in Hull-White one-factor model. Ewp-fin 0411036, Economics Working Paper Archive.

Henrard, M. (2005). Swaptions: 1 price, 10 deltas, and ... 6 1/2 gammas. Wilmott Magazine, pages 48-57.

Henrard, M. (2006a). Bond futures: Delta? no gamma? Quantitative analysis working paper, BIS.

Henrard, M. (2006b). A semi-explicit approach to {C}anary swaptions in HJM one-factor model. Applied Mathematical Finance, 13(1):1-18.

Hull, J.C. (2000). Options, futures, and other derivatives. Prentice Hall, fourth edition.

Hunt, P.J. and Kennedy, J.E. (2004). Financial Derivatives in Theory and Practice. Wiley series in probability and statistics. Wiley, second edition.

Lin, B.-H., Chen, R.-R., and Chou, J.-H. (1999). Pricing the quality option in japanese government bond futures. Applied Financial Economics, 9:51--65.

Nunes, J. and de Oliveira, L. (2004). Quasi-analytical multi-factor valuation of treasury bond futures with and embedded quality option. Technical Report 2493, EFA 2004 Maastricht Meeting.

Rendleman, R. (2004). Delivery options in the pricing and hedging of treasury bond and note futures. Journal of Fixed Income, pages 20-31.

Treasury Public Debt (2006). Monthly statement of the public debt of United States. 31 January.

All papers reproduced by permission. Reproduction and distribution subject to the approval of the copyright owners.
Repository Staff Only: item control page

LMU-Logo
MPRA is a RePEc service hosted by
the Munich University Library in Germany.