The Geographic Space in International Trade: from Gravity to New Economic Geography

Cafiso, Gianluca (2007): The Geographic Space in International Trade: from Gravity to New Economic Geography. Unpublished.

Abstract

In this paper we discuss the foundations of two recent trade theories linked by the role that the space-dimension plays in this kind of models. The theories discussed are the Gravity Approach and the New Economic Geography. We dedicate much to the explanation of the micro-foundations of the gravity equation and to the solution of the Border Puzzle achieved in a relevant and innovative paper by Anderson and van Wincoop. Some upto-date empirical applications, which test or use Gravity and NEG relations, are discussed in order to show how much these two theories are used in empirical trade analysis.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Gravity, Trade Costs, Border Puzzle, Economic Geography
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F10 - General

References

Anderson J. E. (1979), "A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation", American Economic Review 69(1): 106-116.

Anderson J. E. and E. van Wincoop (2003), "Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle", American Economic Review s 93: 170-92.

Anderson J. E. and E. van Wincoop (2004), "Trade Costs", NBER Working Paper no.10480.

Armington P. S. (1969), "A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production", IMF Staff Papers, v. 16: 159-176.

Baier S. L. and J. H. Bergstrad (2001), "The Growth of World Trade: Tariffs, Transport Costs and Income Similarity", Journal of International Economics 53, 2001, 1-27.

Bernard A. B. and J. B. Jensen (1997), "Why some firms export", Review of Economics and Statistics 2003.

Bernard A. B. and J. Wagner (2001), "Export Entry and Exit by German Firms", Weltwirschaftliches Archiv 2001, 137(2), pp.105-123.

Bergstrand J. H. (1985), "The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence", Review of Economics and Statistics, 1985, 67(3), pp. 474-81.

Bergstrand J. H. (1989), "The Generalized Gravity Equation, Monopolistic Competition, and the Factor-Proportions Theory in International Trade", Review of Economics and Statistics, 1989, 71(1), pp. 143-53.

Bergstrand J. H. (1990), "The Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson Model, the Linder Hypothesis and the Determinants of Bilateral Intra-Industry Trade," The Economic Journal, 1990, 100, pp. 1216-29.

Chen N. (2004), “Intra-national versus international trade in the European Union: why do national borders matter?, Journal of International Economics, 63: 93-118.

Davis D. R. (1998), "The Home Market Effect, Trade and Industrial Structure", American Economic Review, 88:1264-76.

Deardorff A. V. (1998), "Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassical World?", in Jeffrey A. Frankel, Ed., The Regionalization of the World Economy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press for the NBER, 7-22.

Dixit A. and J. Stiglitz (1977), "Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity", American Economic Review 67(3):297–308.

Evans C. (2003), "Border effects and the availability of domestic products abroad", IMF Working Paper, Board of Governors 2003.

Evenett S. J. and W. Keller (2002), "On Theories Explaining the Success of the Gravity Equation", Journal of Political Economy, vol. 110, no.2.

Feenstra R. C. (2004), "Advanced International Trade", Princeton University Press.

Feenstra R. C., J. R Markusen, and A. K. Rose (1998), "Understanding the Home Market Effect and the Gravity Equation: the Role of Differentiating Goods", NBER Working Paper no. 6804.

Frankel J. A. (1998), "Regional Trading Blocs in the World Trading System", Washington DC: Institute for International Economics.

Frankel J. A. and A. K. Rose (2002), “An Estimate of the Effect of Common Currencies on Trade and Income”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117: 437-466.

Harrigan J. (2001), "Specialization and the volume of trade: do the data obey the laws?", NBER Working Paper no. 8675.

Head K. and T. Mayer (2003), "The Empirics of Agglomeration and Trade", CEPII Working Paper no. 2003–15.

Helpman E. and P. Krugman (1985), "Market Structure and Foreign Trade: Increasing Returns, Imperfect Competition, and the International Economy" Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1985.

Helpman E. (1987), "Imperfect Competition and International Trade: Evidence from Fourteen Industrial Countries", Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, I(1987) 62-81.

Hummels D. (2001), "Toward a Geography of Trade Costs", working paper, Purdue University.

Klenow P. and A. Rodriguez (1997), "Quantifying variety gains from globalization", Working Paper.

Krugman P. (1991a), "Increasing Returns and Economic Geography", Journal of Political Economy 99:483–499.

Krugman P. (1991b), "Geography and Trade", MIT Press, Cambridge.

Lancaster K. (1980), "Intra-Industry trade under Perfect Monopolistic Competition" Journal of International Economics 10:151-75.

Leamer E.E. and J. Levinsohn (1995), "International Trade Theory: the evidence", Handbook of International Economics chap. 26.

Leamer E.E. and R.M. Stern, (1970), "Constant-market-share analysis of export growth", Chapter 7 in Quantitative International Economics, E.E. Leamer and E.M. Stern, Allyn and Bacon Inc.:Boston, pp. 171-183.

McCallum J. (1995), "National Borders Matter: Canada-U.S. Regional Trade Patterns", American Economic Review 85(3):615-623.

Melitz J. (2002), "Language and Foreign Trade", University of Strathclyde Working Paper.

Obstfeld M. and K. Rogoff (2000), " The Six Major Puzzles in International Macroeconomics: Is There a Common Cause?", NBER Working Paper no. 7777.

Redding S. and A. J. Venables (2004), "Economic Geography and International Inequality", Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1).

Rose A. K. and E. van Wincoop (2001), "National Money as a Barrier to Trade: The Real Case for Currency Union", American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 91(2), pp. 386-390.

Silva S. and S. Tenreyro (2006), “The Log of Gravity”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4): 641–658.

Tchamourliysky Y. (2002), "Distance and Bilateral Trade: the role of non-homothetic preferences", Boston College Working Paper.

Tinbergen J. (1962), "Shaping the world economy", Twentieth Century Fund, New York.