Pavlyuk, Dmitry (2009): Statistical Analysis of the Relationship between Public Transport Accessibility and Flat Prices in Riga. Published in: Transport and Telecommunication , Vol. 10, No. 2 (2009): pp. 26-32.
Download (244kB) | Preview
A relationship between public transport accessibility and residential land value is a point of interest of many recent researches. A hedonic price regression model, widely used in this research area, has one very important shortcoming – it calculates an "average" influence of factors on land value in the analysing area. Usually spatial effects present in data, and the influence of public transport accessibility can be distributed over the area non-uniformly. In this study we apply a comparatively new modification of the regression model – geographically weighted regression – to examine the relationship between public transport accessibility and residential land value (in a form of rent and sell prices) in Riga. The proposed method allows taking into account spatial effects present in the relationship. We use information about geographical locations of urban public transport stops and routes to calculate a level of transport accessibility. Together with the transport accessibility level and a common set of property-specific parameters (floor area, number of rooms, etc.) we consider additional hedonic properties of a flat location such as distances to supermarkets, higher schools and natural attractors like large parks, the river, and the seaside.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Statistical Analysis of the Relationship between Public Transport Accessibility and Flat Prices in Riga|
|English Title:||Statistical Analysis of the Relationship between Public Transport Accessibility and Flat Prices in Riga|
|Keywords:||geographically weighted regression; hedonic price model; public transport accessibility|
|Subjects:||L - Industrial Organization > L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities > L92 - Railroads and Other Surface Transportation
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models; Single Variables > C21 - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models; Quantile Regressions
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C0 - General > C01 - Econometrics
|Depositing User:||Dmitry Pavlyuk|
|Date Deposited:||25. Feb 2010 08:43|
|Last Modified:||14. Feb 2013 19:18|
Spatial Plan of Riga for 2006-2018. Riga City Council, 2005, 214 p.
Report for the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors and the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, Atis Real Weatheralls, University College London, and Symonds Group Land Value and Public Transport, 2002, 36 p.
Fik, T. J. and Ling, D. C., and Mulligan, G. F. Modeling spatial variation in housing prices: a variable interaction approach, Real Estate Economics, 4, 2003, pp. 623-646.
Fotheringham A. S., Brunsdon C., and Charlton M. E. Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships. Chichester: Wiley, 2002. 282 p.
Du H. and Mulley C. Transport accessibility and land value: a case study of Tyne and Wear, RICS Research paper series, Vol. 7 No 3, 2007, 52 p.
Levinson D. M. and Krizel K.J. Access to Destinations. New York: Elsevier Science, 2005. 422 p.
Geurts K.T., Ritsema van Eck J.T. Accessibility Measures: review and applications, RIVM Report 408505 006, Utrecht University, 2001, p. 147
Hometrack report. Key housing market statistics for England and Wales, UK House Price Statistics, 2005, 8 p.
Haining R. Spatial Data analysis. Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. 431 p.