Mancebón-Torrubia, María-Jesús and Calero, Jorge and Choi, Álvaro and Ximénez-de-Embún, Domingo P. (2010): Efficiency of public and publicly-subsidised high schools in Spain. Evidence from PISA 2006.
Download (120Kb) | Preview
The purpose of this paper is to compare the efficiency of the Spanish public and publicly-subsidised private high schools using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) fed by the results provided by a hierarchical linear model (HLM) applied to PISA-2006 (Programme for International Students Assessment) microdata. This study places special emphasis on the estimation of the determinants of school outcomes, the educational production function being estimated through an HLM that takes into account the nested nature of PISA data. Inefficiencies are then measured through the DEA and decomposed into managerial (related to individual performance) and programme (related to structural differences between management models), following Silva Portela and Thanassoulis (2001) approach. Once differences in pupils’ background and individual management inefficiencies have been eliminated, results reveal that Spanish public high schools are more efficient than publicly-subsidised private ones.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Efficiency of public and publicly-subsidised high schools in Spain. Evidence from PISA 2006|
|Keywords:||Efficiency; data envelopment analysis; secondary education; educational outcome; PISA|
|Subjects:||I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Insititutions > I21 - Analysis of Education
I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Insititutions > I28 - Government Policy
I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Insititutions > I22 - Educational Finance
|Depositing User:||Domingo Pérez Ximénez-de-Embún|
|Date Deposited:||07. Mar 2010 04:37|
|Last Modified:||19. Feb 2013 19:46|
Abburà, L. (2005). As good as the others. Northern Italian students and their peers in other European regions. Istituto Ricerche Economico Sociali del Piemonte. November.
Alchian, A.A. (1950). Uncertainty, Evolution and economic theory. Journal of Political Economy, 58, 211-221.
Banker, R., Charnes, A. and Cooper, W.W. (1984). Models for estimating technical and scale efficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30, 1078-1092.
Barbetta, G.P. and Turati, G. (2003). Efficiency of junior high schools and the role of proprietary structure. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 74 (4), 529-551.
Bedi, A.S. and Garg, A. (2000). The effectiveness of private versus public schools: the case of Indonesia. Journal of Development Economics, 61, 463- 494.
Bessent, A.M. and Bessent, E.W. (1980). Determining the comparative efficiency of schools through data envelopment analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 16 (2), 57-75.
Bettinger, E.P. (2005). The effect of charter schools on charter students and public schools. Economics of Education Review, 24, 133-147.
Bryk, A. S. and Raudenbusch, S. W. (1988). Toward a More Appropiate Conceptualization of Research on School Effects: A Three-Level Hierarchical Linear Model. American Journal of Education, 97 (1), 65-108.
Calero, J. and Escardíbul, J. O. (2007). Evaluación de servicios educativos: el rendimiento en los centros públicos y privados medido en PISA-2003. Hacienda Pública Española, 183 (4), 33-66.
Calero, J and Waisgrais, S. (2009). Factores de desigualdad en la educación española. Una aproximación a través de las evaluaciones de PISA. Papeles de Economía Española, 119, 86-99.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. and Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. and Rhodes, E. (1981). Evaluating program and managerial efficiency: an application of data envelopment analysis to program follow through. Management Science, 27 (6), 668-697.
Chiswick, B. R. and Debburman, N. (2004). Educational attainment: analysis by immigrant generation. Economics of Education Review, 23, 361-379.
Chubb, J.E. and Moe, T.M. (1990). Politics, Markets and American Schools. Washington DC: Brookings Institution.
Coleman, J., Campbell, E., Hobson, C., McPartland, J., Mood, A., Weinfeld, F. and York, R. (1966). Equality of Educational Opportunity. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Coleman, J., Hoffer, T. and Kilgore, S. (1982). Secondary school achievement. Public, catholic and private schools compared. New York: Basic Books, Inc. Publishers.
Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M. and Zhu, J. (2004a). Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis. New York: Springer.
Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M. and Zhu, J. (2004 b). Data envelopment analysis. Kluwer: Massachusetts.
Corten, R. and Dronkers, J. (2006). School Achievement of Pupils From the Lower Strata in Public, Private Government-Dependent and Private Government-Independent Schools: A cross-national test of the Coleman-Hoffer thesis. Educational Research and Evaluation, 2, 179-208.
Dronkers, J. (2008). Education as backbone of inequality- European education policy: constraints and possibilities. In F. Becker, K. Duffek and T. Mörschell (eds.), Social Democracy and Education. The European Experience, 50-135. Berlin: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.
Dronkers, J. and Rorbert, P. (2008). Differences in scholastic achievement of public, private government-dependent and private independent schools. A cross-national analysis. Educational Policy, 22 (4), 541-577.
Echols, F. H. and Willims, J. D. (1995). Reasons for school choice in Scotland. Journal of Education Policy, 10 (2), 143-156.
Farley, J. (2006). School Integration and Its Consequences for Social Integration and Educational Opportunity. In F.
Heckmann and R. Wolf (eds.), Immigrant Integration and Education. The Role of State and Civil Society in Germany and the US. Bamberg: EFMS.
Fertig, M. (2003). Who’s to Blame? The Determinants of German Students’ Achievement in the PISA 2000 Study. IZA Discussion Paper Series, 739.
Figlio, D.N. and Stone, J.A. (1997). School choice and student performance. Are private schools really better? Institute for Research on Poverty Discussion Paper, 1141-97. Madison WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Friedman, M. and Friedman, R. (1981). Free to choose. New York: Avon.
Gamoran, A. (2001). American schooling and educational inequality: A forecast for the 21st century. Sociology of Education, 74, 135-153.
Gamoran, A. (2004). Classroom organization and instructional quality. In H. J. Walberg, A. J. Reynolds and M. C. Wang (eds.), Can unlike students learn together? Grade retention, tracking and grouping, 141-155. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Glennerster, H. (1991). Quasi-markets for education? The Economic Journal, 101, 1268-1276.
Goldhaber, D.D. (1996). Public and private secondary schools. Is school choice an answer to the productivity problem? Economics of Education Review, 15 (2), 93-109.
Kang, B. (2004). The effect of public and private competition on high school outputs in New York State. Economics of Education Review, 23, 497-506.
Hanushek, E.A. (1986). The economics of schooling: production and efficiency in public schools. Journal of Economic Literature, 24, 1141-1177.
Hanushek, E.A. (1997). School resources and student performance. In G. Burtless (ed), Does money matter?, 43-73. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Hanushek, E. A. (2003). The Failure of Input-Based Schooling Policies. The Economic Journal, 113, 64-98.
Hanushek, E. A., Kain, J. F., Markman, J. M. and Rivkin, S. G. (2003). Does peer ability affect student achievement? Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18 (5), 527-544.
Hox, J. (1995). Applied Multilevel Analysis. Amsterdam, TT-Publikaties.
Jimenez, E., Lockheed, M.E. and Paqueo, V. (1991). The relative efficiency of private and public schools in developing countries. The World Bank Research Observer, 6 (2), 205-218.
Kao, G. and Tienda, M. (1995). “Optimism and achievement: the educational performance of immigrant youth.” Social Science Quarterly, 76 (1), 1-19.
Kang, C. (2007). Classroom peer effects and academic achievement: Quasi-randomization evidence from South Korea. Journal of Urban Economics, 61 (3), 458-495.
Kirjavainen, T. and Loikkanen, H. (1998). Efficiency differences of Finnish senior secondary schools: an application of DEA and Tobit analysis. Economics of Education Review, 17 (4), 377-394.
Lee, V., Croninger, R.G. and Smith, J.B. (1996). Equity and choice in Detroit. In B. Fuller and R. Elmore (eds). Who chooses, who loses?, 70-91. New York: Teachers College Press.
Levin, H. (1976). Concepts of economic efficiency and educational production. In J.T. Froomkin and R. Radner (eds.). Education as an industry, 149-190. Cambridge: Ballenger Publishing Company.
Mancebón, M.J. and Bandrés, E. (1999). Efficiency evaluation in secondary schools: the key role of model specification and of ex post analysis of results. Education Economics, 7 (2), 131-152.
Mancebón, M. J. and Muniz, M. A. (2003). Aspectos clave de la evaluación de la eficiencia productiva en la educación secundaria. Papeles de Economía Española, 95, 162-187.
Mancebón, M.J. and Muniz, M.A. (2008). Public High Schools in Spain. Disentangling managerial and program efficiencies. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59, 892-901.
Marks, G. (2005). Accounting for immigrant non-immigrant differences in reading and mathematics in twenty countries. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28 (5), 925-946.
Mizzala, A., Romaguera, P. and Farren, D. (2002). The technical efficiency of schools in Chile. Applied Economics, 34, 1533-1552.
Neal, D. (1997). The effects of catholic secondary schooling on educational achievement. Journal of Labor Economics, 15 (1), 98-123.
O’Donogue, M. (1971). Economic Dimensions in Education. London, UK: Gill and Macmillan Publishers.
OECD. (2005a). PISA-2003 Data Analysis Manual. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2005b). PISA-2003. Technical report. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2006). Where inmigrant students succeed. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2007). PISA-2006 Science Competencies for Tomorrow's World, 1 (analysis). Paris: OECD.
Opdenakker, M. C. and Van Damme, J. (2006). Differences between secondary schools: A study about school context, group composition, school practice, and school effects with special attention to public and Catholic schools and types of schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17 (1), 87-117.
Perelman, S. and Santin, D. (2008). Measuring educational efficiency at student level with parametric stochastic distance functions: an application to Spanish PISA results. Education Economics. DOI: 10.1080/09645290802470475.
Peterson, P. (1990). The public schools: monopoly or choice. In W. Clune and J.F. Witte (eds). Choice and Control in American Education, vol. 1. (47-78). Philadelphia: The Falmer Press.
Pincus, J. (1974). Incentives for innovation in the public schools. Review of Educational Research, 44 (1), 113- 144.
Rong, X. and Grant, L. (1992). Ethnicity, generation, and school attainment of Asians, Hispanics and Non-Hispanic Whites. The Sociological Quarterly, 33 (4), 625-636.
Rumberger, R. W. and Larson, K. A. (1998). Towards explaining differences in educational achievement among Mexican American and language minority students. Sociology of Education, 71 (1), 68-92.
Sander, W. (1996). Catholic grade schools and academic achievement. Journal of Human Resources, 31 (3), 540-548.
Schnepf, V. S. (2008). Inequality of Learning amongst Immigrant Children in Industrialised Countries. IZA Discussion Paper, 3337.
Silva Portela, M.C. and Thanassoulis, E. (2001). Decomposing school and school-type efficiency. European Journal of Operational Research, 132, 357-373.
Sirin, S.R. (2005). Socioeconomic Status and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Review of Research. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417-453.
Somers, M-A., McEwan, P. J., and Willms, J. D. (2004) How Effective Are Private Schools in Latin America? Comparative Education Review, 48 (1), 48-69.
Stevans, L. K. and Sessions, D. N. (2000). Private/public school choice and student performance revisited. Education Economics, 8 (2), 169-184.
Thanassoulis. E. (2001). Introduction to the Theory and Application of Data Envelopment Analysis. Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Tiebout, C.M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416-424.
Willms, J. D. (2006). Learning divides: Ten policy questions about the performance and equity of schools and schooling systems. UIS Working Paper, 5. Montreal: Unesco Institute for Statistics.
Woessmann, L. (2003). Schooling resources, educational institutions and student performance: the international evidence. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 65 (2), 117-170.
Worthington, A. (2001). An empirical survey of frontier efficiency measurement techniques in education. Education Economics, 9 (3), 245-268.
Available Versions of this Item
- Efficiency of public and publicly-subsidised high schools in Spain. Evidence from PISA 2006. (deposited 07. Mar 2010 04:37) [Currently Displayed]