Schakel, Arjan Hille (2009): A Postfunctionalist Theory of Regional Government.
Download (655Kb) | Preview
The structure of government―the number of tiers and the allocation of tasks over these tiers―has been a subject of political research since Althusius (1603) and Pufendorf (1672). More recently, the process of European integration revived the interest in the allocation of tasks across government tiers.1 One approach to this topic is the subsidiarity principle of the European Union which states that matters ought to be handled by the lowest feasible tier. However, the subsidiarity principle has also been used by the member states of the European Union as an argument to safeguard national autonomy (Van Kersbergen and Verbeek 1994). The precise allocation of tasks across government tiers remains a matter of fierce normative and empirical debate.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||A Postfunctionalist Theory of Regional Government|
|English Title:||A Postfunctionalist Theory of Regional Government|
|Keywords:||federalism;decentralization;regional authority; fiscal indicators|
|Subjects:||H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations > H77 - Intergovernmental Relations; Federalism; Secession
H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations > H75 - State and Local Government: Health; Education; Welfare; Public Pensions
H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations > H76 - State and Local Government: Other Expenditure Categories
|Depositing User:||Abdul Hamid|
|Date Deposited:||24. Mar 2010 09:30|
|Last Modified:||17. Feb 2013 15:12|
Adcock, Robert and David Collier (2001), ‘Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research’, American Political Science Review, Vol.95, No.3, pp.529-46.
Akai, Nobuo and Masayo Sakata (2002), ‘Fiscal Decentralization Contributes to Economic Growth: Evidence from State-Level Cross-Section Data for the United States’, Journal of Urban Economics, Vol.52, No.1, pp.93-108.
Arzaghi, Mohammed and J. Vernon Henderson (2005) ‘Why Countries are Fiscally Decentralizing’, Journal of Public Economics, Vol.89, No.7, pp.1157-89.
Baldi, Brunetta (1999), ‘Beyond the Federal-Unitary Dichotomy’, Working Paper. Institute of Governmental Studies. Univeristy of California, Berkely.
Bollen, Kenneth (1989), Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: Wily.
Brancati, Dawn (2006), ‘Decentralization: Fueling or Dampening the Flames of Ethnic Conflict and Secessionism’, International Organization, Vol.60, No.3, pp.651-85.
Braun, Dietmar (2000), ‘The Territorial Division of Power in Comparative Public Policy Research: An Assessment’, in: Dietmar Braun (ed), Public Policy and Federalism. Aldershot, Ashgate.
Breauss, Fritz and Markus Eller (2004), ‘Fiscal Decentralisation and Economic Growth: Is There Really a Link?’, CESifo DICE Report, Journal of Institutional Comparisons, Vol.2, No.1.
Castles, Francis G. (1999), ‘Decentralization and the Post-War Economy’, European Journal of Political Research, Vol.36, No.1, pp.27-53.
Council of Europe (2000). Structure and Operation of Local and Regional Democracy: Poland. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
Davey, Kenneth (2004), Fiscal Decentralisation in South-Eastern Europe. Budapest: The Local Government and Public Reform Initiative.
Ebel, Robert D. and Serdar Yilmaz (2002), ‘On the Measurement and Impact of Fiscal Decentralization’, Policy Research Working Paper, 2809, Washington: World Bank.
Enikolopov, Ruben and Ekaterina Zhuravskaya (2007), ‘Decentralization and Political Institutions’, Journal of Public Economics, Vol.91, No.11-12, pp.2261-90.
Fisman, Raymond and Roberta Gatti (2002), ‘Decentralization and Corruption: Evidence Across Countries’, Journal of Public Economics, Vol.83, No.3, pp.325-45.
Glowacki, Viktor (2002), ‘Regionalization in Poland’, in: Gérard Marcou (ed) Regionalization for Development and Accession to the EU: A Comparative Perspective. Budapest: The Local Government and Public Reform Initiative.
Hooghe, Liesbet and Gary Marks (2001), Multi-Level Governance and European Integration. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Kowalczyk, Andrzej (2000), ’Local Government in Poland’, in: Tamás M. Horváth (ed) Decentralization: Experiments and Reforms, Volume 1. Budapest: Local Government and Public Sector Reform Initiative.
Lane, Jan-Erik and Svante Ersson (1999), Politics and Society in Western Europe. London: Sage Publications.
Lijphart, Arend (1999), Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Majone, Giandomenico (1994), ‘The Rise of the Regulatory State in Europe’, West European Politics, Vol.17, No.3, pp.77-101.
Martinez-Vazquez, Jorge and Robert McNab (1997), ‘Fiscal Decentralization, Economic Growth, and Democratic Governance’, Working Paper 97-7, George State University: Andrew Young School of Policy Studies.
Meloche, Jean-Philippe, François Vaillancourt, and Serdar Yilmaz (2004), ‘Decentralization or Fiscal Autonomy? What Does Really Matter? Effects of Growth and Public Sector Size in European Transition Countries’, Policy Research Working Paper, 3254, Washington: World Bank.
Marks, Gary, Liesbet Hooghe, Marco R. Steenbergen, and Liesbet Hooghe (2007), ‘Crossvalidating Data on Party Positioning on European Integration,' Electoral Studies, Vol.26, No.1, pp.23–38.
Oates, Wallace (1972), Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Javanovich.
Okraszewska, Aldona and Jacek Kwiatkowski (2002), ‘The State of Democracy in Poland’s Gminas‘, in: Gábor Soós, Gábor Tóka, and Glen Wright (eds) The State of Local Democracy in Central Europe. Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative.
Panizza, Ugo (1999), ‘On the Determinants of Fiscal Centralization: Theory, and Evidence’, Journal of Public Economics, Vol.74, No.1, pp.97-139.
Ray, Leonard (2007), ‘Validity of Measured Party Positions on European Integration: Assumptions, Approaches, and a Comparison of Alternative Measures’, Electoral Studies, Vol.26, No.1, pp.11-22.
Rodden, Jonathan (2004), ‘Comparative Federalism and Decentralization. On Meaning and Measurement’, Comparative Politics, Vol.36, No.4, pp.481-99.
Schneider, Aaron (2003), ‘Decentralization: Conceptualization and Measurement’, Studies in Comparative International Development, Vol.38, No.3, pp.32-56.
Shah, Anwar (2007), ‘A Practioner’s Guide to Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers’, in Robin Boadway and Anwar Shah (eds), Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers. Principles and Practice. World Bank, Washington DC.
Sharma, Chanchal Kumar (2006), ‘Decentralization Dilemma: Measuring the Degree and Evaluating the Outcomes, The Indian Journal of Political Science, Vol.67, No.1, pp.49-64.
Stegarescu, Dan (2005a), ‘Public Sector Decentralisation: Measurement, Concepts and Recent International Trends’, Fiscal Studies, Vol.26, No.3, pp.301-33.
Stegarescu, Dan (2005b), ‘Costs, Preferences, and Institutions: An Empirical Analysis of the Determinants of Government Decentralization’, Discussion Paper No. 05-39, Manheim: Centre for European Economic Research.
Swenden, Wilfried (2006), Federalism and Regionalism in Western Europe. A Comparative and Thematic Analysis. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Todorovski, Ilija (2001), ‘Local Government in Macedonia’, in Emilia Kandeva (ed) Stabilization of Local Governments. Local Governments in Central and Eastern Europe. Volume 2. Budapest: Local Government and Public Sector Reform Initiative.
Treisman, Daniel (2002), ‘Defining and Measuring Decentralization: A Global Perspective’, Unpublished manuscript.
Watts, Ronald L. (1999) Comparing Federal Systems. Second Edition. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Woldendorp, Jaap, Hans Keman and Ian Budge (2000), Party Government in 28 Democracies (1945-1998): Composition – Duration – Personnel. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisihers