Baskaran, Thushyanthan (2010): On the Link Between Fiscal Decentralization and Public Debt in OECD Countries. Forthcoming in: Public Choice (2010)
Download (374Kb) | Preview
Excessive borrowing by subnational governments is considered to be one of the perils of fiscal decentralization. On the other hand, fiscal decentralization might ensure the scal stability of the public sector by constraining Leviathan governments. Since the impact of decentralized government on fiscal outcomes is therefore ambiguous from a theoretical perspective, we explore this question empirically with a panel of 17 OECD countries over the 1975-2001 period. Our findings suggest that expenditure decentralization signicantly reduces public indebtedness, whereas tax decentralization and vertical fiscal imbalances are insignicant.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||On the Link Between Fiscal Decentralization and Public Debt in OECD Countries|
|English Title:||On the Link Between Fiscal Decentralization and Public Debt in OECD Countries|
|Keywords:||Fiscal decentralization, Public debt, Soft budget constraints|
|Subjects:||H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations > H77 - Intergovernmental Relations; Federalism; Secession|
|Depositing User:||Abdul Hamid|
|Date Deposited:||24. Mar 2010 09:26|
|Last Modified:||14. Feb 2013 16:16|
Alesina, A. and R. Perotti (1995). The political economy of budget deficits.IMF-Stafi-Papers 42 (1), 1-31.
Apolte, T. (2001). How tame will leviathan become in institutional competition? – competition among governments in the provision of public goods. Public Choice 107 (3-4), 359-381.
Armingeon, K., M. Gerber, P. Leimgruber, and M. Beyeler (2008). Comparative Political Data Set 1960-2006. Institute of Political Science, University of Berne 2008 (Database).
Baum, C. F. (2000, October). XTTEST3: Stata module to compute modified wald statistic for groupwise heteroskedasticity. Statistical Software Components, Boston College Department of Economics.
Beck, N. and J. N. Katz (1995). What to do (and not to do) with time series cross-section data. American Political Science Review 89 (3), 634-647.
Beck, T., G. Clarke, A. Grofi, P. Keefer, and P. Walsh (2001). New tools in comparative political economy: the database of political institutions. World Bank Economic Review 15 (1), 165-176.
Bohn, H. and R. P. Inman (1996). Balanced budget rules and public deficits: evidence from the U.S. States. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 45, 13-76.
Borrelli, S. and T. Royed (1995). Government strength and budget deficits in advanced democracies. European Journal of Political Research 28 (2), 225-260.
Brennan, G. and J. Buchanan (1980). The power to tax: analytical foundations of a fiscal constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cabasfies, F., P. Pascual, and J. Vallfies (2007). The efiectiveness of institutional borrowing restrictions: empirical evidence from spanish municipalities. Public Choice 131 (3), 293-313.
De Mello, L. (2005). Globalization and fiscal federalism: does openness constrain subnational budget imbalances? Public Budgeting and Finance 25 (1), 1-14.
De Mello, L. R. (1999). Intergovernmental fiscal relations: coordination failures and fiscal outcomes. Public Budgeting & Finance 19 (1), 3-25.
De Mello, L. R. (2000). Fiscal decentralization and intergovernmental fiscal relations: a cross country analysis. World Development 28 (2), 365-380.
Ebel, R. D. and S. Yilmaz (2002). On the measurement and impact of fiscal decentralization. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2809.
Eichenberger, R. and M. Schelker (2007). Independent and competing agencies: an efiective way to control government. Public Choice 130 (1-2), 79-98.
Elder, J. and P. E. Kennedy (2001). Testing for unit roots: what should students be taught? Journal of Economic Education 31 (2), 137-146.
Elgie, R. and I. McMenamin (2008). Political fragmentation, fiscal deficits and political institutionalisation. Public Choice 136 (3-4), 255-267.
Feld, L. P. and G. Kirchgässner (2001). Does direct democracy reduce public debt? Evidence from swiss municipialities. Public Choice 109 (3-4), 347-370.
Fisman, R. and R. Gatti (2002). Decentralization and corruption: evidence from U.S. federal transfer programs. Public Choice 113 (1-2), 25-35.
Fornasari, F., S. B. Webb, and H. Zou (2000). The macroeconomic impact of decentralized spending and deficits: international evidence. Annals of Economics and Finance 1 (2), 403-433.
Freitag, M. and A. Vatter (2008). Decentralization and fiscal discipline in sub-national governments: evidence from the swiss federal system. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 38 (2), 272-294.
Goodspeed, T. J. (2002). Bailouts in a federation. International Tax and Public Finance 9 (4), 409-421.
Hayek, F. A. (1939). The economic conditions of interstate federalism. New Commonwealth Quarterly 2, 131-149. Reprinted in: Friedrich von Hayek (1957). Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hibbs, D. (1977). Political parties and macroeconomic policy. American Political Science Review 71 (4), 1467-87.
Jin, J. and H. Zou (2002). How does fiscal decentralization afiect aggregate, national, and subnational government size? Journal of Urban Economics 52 (2), 270-293.
Kiewiet, D. R. and K. Szakaly (1996). Constitutional limitations on borrowing: an analysis of state bonded indebtedness. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 12 (1), 62-97.
Kornai, J., E. Maskin, and G. Roland (2003). Understanding the soft budget constraint. Journal of Economic Literature 41 (4), 1095-1136.
Köthenbürger, M. (2005). Leviathans, federal transfers, and the cartelization hypothesis. Public Choice 122 (3-4), 449-465.
Lagona, F. and F. Padovano (2007). A nonlinear principal component analysis of the relationship between budget rules and fiscal performance in the European Union. Public Choice 130 (3-4), 401-436.
Marlow, M. L. (1988). Fiscal decentralization and government size. Public Choice 56 (3), 259-269.
Musgrave, R. M. (1959). The theory of public finance. New York: McGraw-Hil.
Neck, R. and M. Getzner (2001). Politico-economic determinants of public debt growth: a case study for Austria. Public Choice 109 (3-4), 243-268.
Oates, W. (1972). Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Oates, W. (1985). Searching for leviathan: an empirical study. American Economic Review 75 (4), 748-758.
OECD (1999). Taxing Power of State and Local Government. OECD Tax Policy Studies 1. Paris: OECD.
Razin, A. and E. Sadka (1991). International tax competition and gains from tax harmonization. Economic Letters 37 (1), 69-76.
Rodden, J. (2002). The dilemma of fiscal federalism: grants and fiscal performance around the world. American Journal of Political Science 46 (3), 670-687.
Schaltegger, C. and L. P. Feld (2009). Are fiscal adjustments less successful in decentralized governments? European Journal of Political Economy 25 (1), 115-123.
Seitz, H. (2000). Fiscal policy, deficits, and politics of subnational governments: the case of the German Länder. Public Choice 102 (3-4), 183-218.
Sharma, C. K. (2005). Why decentralization? The puzzle of causation. Synthesis 3 (1), 1-17.
Singh, R. and A. Plekhanov (2005). How should subnational government borrowing be regulated? Some cross-country empirical evidence. IMF Working Paper No. 54.
Stegarescu, D. (2005). Public sector decentralization: measurement concepts and recent international trends. Fiscal Studies 26 (3), 301-333.
Stein, E. (1998). Fiscal decentralization and government size in Latin America. In K. Fukasaku and R. Hausmann (Eds.), Democracy, Decentralization and Deficits in Latin America, pp. 95-119. Washington D.C.: IDB-OECD.
Tiebout, C. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy 64 (5), 416-424.
Treisman, D. (2002). Defining and measuring decentralization: a global perspective. UCLA Working Paper.
Treisman, D. (2006). Explaining fiscal decentralization: geography, colonial history, economic development, and political institutions. Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 44 (3), 289 - 325.
Volkerink, B. and J. de Haan (2001). Fragmented government efiects on fiscal policy: new evidence. Public Choice 109 (3-4), 221-242.
Weingast, B., K. Shepsle, and C. Johnsen (1981). The political economy of costs and benefits: a neoclassical approach to distributive politics. Journal of Political Economy 89 (4), 642-664.
Wildasin, D. (1997). Externalities and bailouts: hard and soft budget constraints in intergovernmental fiscal relations. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 1843.
Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
World Bank (2000). World development report 1999/2000. Entering the 21st century. New York: Oxford University Press.
World Bank Independent Evaluation Group (2008). Decentralization in client countries. An evaluation of World Bank support, 1990-2007. Technical report, World Bank