Medina, Leandro (2010): A Commodity Curse? The Dynamic Effects of Commodity Prices on Fiscal Performance in Latin America.
Download (2MB) | Preview
The recent boom and bust in commodity prices has raised concerns about the impact of volatile commodity prices on Latin American countries’ fiscal positions. Using a novel quarterly dataset─ which includes unique country specific commodity price indices and a comprehensive measure of public expenditures─ this paper analyzes the dynamic effects of commodity price fluctuations on fiscal revenues and expenditures for 8 commodity exporting Latin American countries. The results indicate that Latin American countries’ fiscal positions generally react strongly to shocks to commodity prices, yet there are marked differences across countries in observed reactions. Fiscal variables in Venezuela display the highest sensitivity to commodity price shocks, with expenditures reacting significantly more than revenues. On the other side of the spectrum, Chile’s fiscal indicators react very little to commodity price fluctuations, and their dynamic responses are very similar to those seen in high-income commodity exporting countries. A plausible explanation to this distinct behavior across countries could be related to the efficient application of fiscal rules, accompanied by strong institutions, political commitment and high standards of transparency.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||A Commodity Curse? The Dynamic Effects of Commodity Prices on Fiscal Performance in Latin America|
|Keywords:||Latin America, Emerging Economies, Commodity Prices, Fiscal Policy, Macroeconomics, Procyclicality, Procyclical, Dynamic Effects,Government Spending|
|Subjects:||E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, Macroeconomic Policy, and General Outlook > E62 - Fiscal Policy
H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H50 - General
O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O13 - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Energy; Environment; Other Primary Products
|Depositing User:||Leandro Medina|
|Date Deposited:||29. Mar 2010 06:34|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 14:48|
Alesina, A. and G. Tabellini; “Why is Fiscal Policy Often Procyclical?” NBER Working Paper No. 11600; 2005.
Bhattacharyya S. and J. Williamson; “Commodity Price Shocks and the Australian Economy Since Federation”; NBER Working Paper No. 14694; 2009.
Blanchard O. and R. Perotti; “An Empirical Characterization of the Dynamics Effects of Changes in Government Spending and Taxes on Output”; NBER, 1999.
Boccara B. ;”Why Fiscal Spending Persists When a Boom in Primary Commodities Ends”; The World Bank; 1994.
Caballero, R. J., and A. Krishnamurthy; “Fiscal policy and financial depth”; NBER Working Paper No. 10532. 2004.
Calderon C. and K. Schmidt-Hebbel; “Macroeconomic Policies and Performance in Latin America”; Journal of International Money and Finance; Vol. 22; pp. 895-923; 2003.
Calderon C. and P. Fajnzylber; “How Much Room Does Latin America And The Caribbean Have For Implementing Counter-Cyclical Fiscal Policies?”; April, 2009.19
Collier P. and B. Goderis; “Commodity Prices, Growth and the Natural Resource Curse: Reconciling a Conundrum”; University of Oxfords; 2007.
Collier P. and J. Gunning; “Trade Shocks: Consequences and Policy Responses in Developing Countries”; San Francisco; International Center for Economic Growth; 1994.
Corbacho A. and Schwartz G; “Fiscal Responsibility Laws” in Kumar, M. S. and Ter-Minassian T.(eds);”Promoting Fiscal Discipline”; International Monetary Fund; 2007.
Deaton A. and R. Miller; “International Commodity Prices, Macroeconomic Performance, and Politics in Sub-Saharan Africa”; Princeton Studies in International Finance 79. 1995.
Gavin M. and R. Perotti; ”Fiscal Policy in Latin America”: NBER Macroeconomics Annual. 1997.
Hirschman A.; “A Generalized Linkage Approach to Development, with Special Reference to Staples”; Economic Development and Cultural Change; 25; 1977.
Hodrick R. and Prescott E.; "Postwar U.S. Business Cycles: An Empirical Investigation"; Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking; 1997.
Ilzetzki, E.; “Rent-seeking distortions and fiscal pro-cyclicality.” University of Maryland, manuscript, December 2008.
Ilzetzki, E., and C.A. Végh: “ Pro-cyclical fiscal policy in developing countries: Truth or fiction?”; NBER Working Paper 14191, July 2008.
International Monetary Fund; Western Hemisphere: Regional Economic Outlook; “Saving for a Rainy Day? Sensitivity of LAC Fiscal Positions to Commodity Prices”; Di Bella G., H. Kamil and L. Medina; 2009.
International Monetary Fund: “Norway: Selected Issues”; Rossi M., Jafarov E. and Leigh D.; May 2007.
International Monetary Fund: “Western Hemisphere: Regional Economic Outlook”; April 2008.
Kaminsky, G.L., C.M. Reinhart, and C.A. Végh; “When it rains, it pours: Procyclical capital flows and macroeconomic policies.” In: Gertler, M., and K. Rogoff, eds., NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2004. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press 2005.
Perron P.; “The Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock, and the Unit Root Hypothesis”; Econometrica 57 Nov 1989.
Perotti R.; “Fiscal Policy in Developing Countries: A Framework and Some Questions”; The World Bank: 2007.
Raddatz C.; “Are external shocks responsible for the instability of output in low-income countries?”; Journal of Development Economics; Elsevier, vol. 84(1), pages 155-187; September 2007.
Riascos A. and C. A. Végh; "Procyclical Government Spending in Developing Countries: The Role of Capital Market Imperfections."; mimeo, UCLA and Banco Republica, Colombia; 2003.
Sims, C.; “Macroeconomics and Reality”; Econometrica; 48(1); 1980.
Talvi E. and C. A. Végh ;"Tax Base Variability and Pro-cyclical Fiscal Policy in Developing Countries"; Journal of Development Economics 78 (1): 156-190. 2005.
Tornell A. and P. Lane; “Are windfalls a curse? A nonrepresentative agent model of the current account"; Journal of International Economics 44, pp. 83-112; 1998.
Tornell A. and P. Lane; ”The Voracity Effect”; American Economic Review, Vol. 89; 1999, pp. 22-46.