The Institution of Douglass North

McCloskey, Deirdre Nansen (2009): The Institution of Douglass North.

Abstract

North, with many other Samuelsonian economists, thinks of “institutions” as budget constraints in a maximization problem. But as Clifford Geertz put it, an institution such as a toll for safe passage is “rather more than a mere payment,” that is, a mere monetary constraint. “It was part of a whole complex of moral rituals, customs with the force of law and the weight of sanctity.” The Geertzian metaphor of negotiation and ritual makes more sense than the metaphor of a mere budget constraint. Meaning matters. North in particular thinks that the budget line of anti-property violence was shifted in the late 17th century. It was not: on the contrary, England was a land of property rights from the beginning. So “institutional change” does not explain the Industrial Revolution. The timing is wrong. Incentive (Prudence Only) is not the main story, and cannot be the main story without contradiction: if it was Prudence Only the Industrial Revolution would have happened earlier, or elsewhere. Other virtues and vices mattered—not only prudence, beloved of the Samuelsonians; but temperance, courage, justice, faith, hope, and love, which changed radically in their disposition in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Sheer commercial expansion is routine and predictable and ill-suited therefore to explaining the greatest surprise in economic history. The Glorious Revolution of 1689, which North and Weingast have cast in a central role, merely made the British state effective. It did not change property rights, as economists such as Darin Acemoglou have supposed, on the basis of North’s tale. North praises patents and incorporation laws, neither of which had much impact in the Industrial Revolution. The 18th century, in other words, was not a century of “institutional change.” Nor is the entire absence of property relevant to the place or period. Richard Pipes argued it was relevant, on the basis of the Russian case. Yet only in society’s dominated by Steppe nomads was property weak---in Europe in the 16th and 17th centuries, as in China then, it had been strong for centuries past. The Stuarts were not princes of Muscovy. And indeed private property characterizes all settled human societies.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Douglass North, Industrial Revolution, institutions, Clifford Geertz, institutional change, virtues
• Subjects: N - Economic History > N0 - General > N00 - General

References

Acemoglou, Daron. 2008. “Growth and Institutions.” In S. N. Durlauf and L. E. Blume, eds., The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, Second Edition. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Allen, Robert C. 1983. “Collective Invention.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 4 (1, Jan.): 605-633.

Allen, Robert C. 2006. “The British Industrial Revolution in Global Perspective: How Commerce Created the Industrial Revolution and Modern Economic Growth.” Unpublished paper Nuffield College, Oxford University. At http://www.nuffield.ox.ac.uk/users/allen/ unpublished/econinvent-3.pdf

Anderson, Terry L., and Peter J. Hill. 2004. The Not So Wild, Wild West: Property Rights on the Frontier. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Appleby, Joyce Oldham. 1978. Economic Thought and Ideology in Seventeenth-Century England. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Berman, Harold J. 2003. Law and Revolution, II: The Impact of the Protestant Reformations on the Western Legal Tradition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Blanning, Tim. 2007. The Pursuit of Glory: Europe 1648-1815. New York: Viking and Penguin.

Boettke, Peter J., and Virgil Henry Storr. 2002. “Post Classical Political Economy. American Journal of Economics

Bogart, Dan. 2009. “Did the Glorious Revolution Contribute to the Transport Revolution? Evidence from Investment in Roads and Rivers.” Unpublished paper, Department of Economics, UC Irvine.

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1979 (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. Trans. Richard Nice. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Butler, Joseph, Bishop. 1725. Fifteen Sermons. Pp. 335-528 in The Analogy of Religion and Fifteen Sermons. 1736. London: The Religious Tract Society, n.d.

Butler, Samuel. 1912. The Notebooks of Samuel Butler. At Project Gutenberg http://www.gutenberg.org/ etext/6173

Campbell, Bruce M. S. 2005. “The Agrarian Problem of the Early Fourteenth Century.” Past and Present 188: 3-70.

Carlos, Ann, and Frank Lewis. 1999. "Property Rights, Competition and Depletion in the Eighteenth-Century Fur Trade: The Role of the European Market.” Canadian Journal of Economics 32: 705-728.

Carlyle, Thomas. 1829. “Signs of the Times.” At http://www.victorianweb.org/authors/carlyle/signs1.html

Clark, Gregory. 2007a. A Farewell to Alms: A Brief Economic History of the World. Princeton: Princeton University Press

Clark, Gregory. 2007b. “Some Limited Responses to My Critics.” Power point presentation to the Social Science History Association, Chicago Meeting, November 17.

Clark, Gregory. 2007c. “A Review of Avner Greif’s Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons from Medieval Trade. Journal of Economic Literature 45 (Sept): 727-743.

De Cecco, Marcello. 1975. Money and Empire : The International Gold Standard, 1890-1914. Totowa, N.J. : Rowman and Littlefield

Deakin, Simon. 2008. “Legal Origin, Juridical Form and Industrialization in Historical Perspective: The Case of the Employment Contract and the Joint-Stock Company.” Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge. Working Paper No. 369.

Demsetz, Harold. 1967. “Towards a Theory of Property Rights.” American Economic Review 57 (May): 347-359.

Ekelund, R. B., Jr., and Robert D. Tollison. 1981. Mercantilism as a Rent-Seeking Society: Economic Regulation in Historical Perspective. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.

Geertz, Clifford, Hildred Geertz, and Lawrence Rosen. 1979. Meaning and Order in Moroccan. Society. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Gilbert, W. S., and A. S. Sullivan. 1893. “Utopia Limited.” In The Complete Plays of Gilbert and Sullivan. New York: W. W. Norton, 1976.

Gintis, Herbert. 2006. “The Evolution of Private Property.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 64(2007): 1-16. At http://www-unix.oit.umass.edu/~gintis/

Goffman, Erving. 1961. Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. New York: Doubleday.

Goldsmith, Raymond W. 1984. ”An Estimate of the Size and Structure of the National Product of the Early Roman Empire.” Review of Income and Wealth (Sept): 263-288.

Grantham, George. 2009. “Science and its Transactions Cost: The Emergence of Institutionalized Science.” Unpublished paper, McGill University and Paris School of Economics. At http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc: mcl:mclwop:2009-05&r=his

Greenfeld, Liah. 2001. The Spirit of Capitalism: Nationalism and Economic Growth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Greif, Avner. 2006. Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons from Medieval Trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hardin, Garrett. 1968. "The Tragedy of the Commons." Science 162: 1243-1248.

Hellie, Richard. 2003. “Russia: Early Modern Period.” In Mokyr, ed. ,Oxford Encyclopedia of Economic History.

Higgs, Robert. 1997. “Regime Uncertainty: Why the Great Depression Lasted So Long and Why Prosperity Resumed after the War.” The Independent Review 1 (Spring): 561-590.

Higgs, Robert. 2006. Depression, War, and Cold War: Challenging the Myths of Conflict and Prosperity. New York: Oxford University Press.

Hobbes, Thomas. 1651. Leviathan. C. B. Macpherson, ed. Harmondsworth: Penguin 1986.

Hoppit, Julian. 1996. “Patterns of Parliamentary Legislation, 1660-1800.” History Journal: 39: 109-31.

Hume, David. 1754-1755. The History of England. Vol. VI. 1778 ed. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1983.

Hume, David. 1777 (1987). Essays Moral, Political and Literary. E. F. Miller, ed. Revised edition. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

Kelling, George L., and James Q. Wilson. “Broken Windows.” Atlantic (March 1982)

Lachmann, Ludwig. 1977. Capital, Expectations and the Market Process. Kansas City: Sheed Andrews and McMeel.

Lal, Depak. 2006. Reviving the Invisible Hand: The Case for Classical Liberalism in the Twentieth Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Lattimore, Owen. 1940. Inner Asian Frontiers of China. New York: American Geographical Society.

Macaulay, Thomas Babbington. 1830. “Southey's Colloquies on Society.” Edinburgh Review, Jan. Reprinted in Critical, Historical, and Miscellaneous Essays by Lord Macaulay. Boston, 1860 (1881), Vol. II: 132-187.

Macfarlane, Alan. 1978. The Origins of English Individualism: The Family, Property, and Social Transition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Macfarlane, Alan. 2000. The Riddle of the Modern World: Of Liberty, Wealth, and Equality. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

McCloskey, Deirdre N. 1975a. “The Economics of Enclosure: A Market Analysis.” Pp. 123-160 in E. L. Jones and William Parker, eds. European Peasants and Their Markets: Essays in Agrarian Economic History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

McCloskey, Deirdre N. 1991a. "History, Nonlinear Differential Equations, and the Problem of Narration." History and Theory 30: 21 36.

McKeon, Michael. 1987. The Origins of the English Novel, 1600-1740. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2002.

Migheli, Matteo. 2009. “The Two Sides of a Ghost: Twenty Years without the Wall.” Unpublished paper University of Eastern Piedmont, Department of Public Policy and Collective Choice, Alessandria, Italy. At http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:uca:ucapdv:125&r=his

Millar, John. 1787 (1803). An Historical View of the English Government. 1803 posthumous reprint of 2nd. ed. available at Liberty Fund: On-Line Library of Liberty.

Mokyr, Joel, ed. 2003. The Oxford Encyclopedia of Economic History. Six volumes. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press

Mokyr, Joel. 1990. The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress. New York: Oxford University Press.

Mokyr, Joel. 1999a. “Editor’s Introduction: The New Economic History and the Industrial Revolution.” Pp. 1-131 in Joel Mokyr, ed., The British Industrial Revolution: An Economic Perspective. Boulder: Westview Press.

Mokyr, Joel. 2002. The Gifts of Athena: Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Mokyr, Joel. 2003. “Industrial Revolution.” In Mokyr, ed., Oxford Encyclopedia of Economic History.

Mokyr, Joel. 2007a. “The European Enlightenment, the Industrial Revolution, and Modern Economic Growth.” Max Weber Lecture, European University Institute, Bellagio, March 27, 2007. At http://faculty.wcas.northwestern.edu/~jmokyr/Florence-Weber.PDF

Mokyr, Joel. 2007b. “Discussion of Clark’s Farewell to Alms.” Meet-the-Author Session at the Social Science History Convention, Chicago, November. http://eh.net/bookreviews /ssha_farewell_to_alms.pdf

Montesquieu, Charles-Louis de Secondat, baron de La Brède et de. 1748. De l'Esprit des Lois (The Spirit of the Laws). Numerous editions.

Nordhaus, William D. 2004. “Schumpeterian Profits in the American Economy: Theory and Measurement.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper W10433.

North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

North, Douglass C. 1991. “Institutions.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (1, Winter): 97-112. At http://www.compilerpress.atfreeweb.com/Anno%20North%20Institutions.htmt

North, Douglass C. 1993. “Nobel Prize Autobiography.” From Les Prix Nobel. The Nobel Prizes 1993, Editor Tore Frängsmyr, [Nobel Foundation], Stockholm, 1994. http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/ economics/laureates/1993/north-autobio.html.

North, Douglass C. 2005. Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton Economic History of the Western World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

North, Douglass C., and Barry R. Weingast. 1989. “Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England.” Journal of Economic History 49 (Dec.): 803-832.

North, Douglass C., and Robert Paul Thomas. 1973. The Rise of the Western World: A New Economic History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nuvolari, Alessandro. 2004. "Collective Invention during the British Industrial Revolution: The Case of the Cornish Pumping Engine." Cambridge Journal of Economics 28:347-363.

Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Peake, Harold, and Herbert Fleure. 1928. The Steppe and the Sown, New Haven: Yale University Press.

Perdue, Peter. 2003. “Silk Road.” In Mokyr, ed. Oxford Encyclopedia of Economic History.

Perdue, Peter. 2005. China Marches West: The Qing Conquest of Central Eurasia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Reinhart, Carmen M., and Kenneth Rogoff. 2008. “This Time is Different: A Panoramic View of Eight Centuries of Financial Crises.” At http://www.publicpolicy.umd.edu/news/This_Time_Is_Different_ 04_16_2008%20REISSUE.pdf

Sellar, Walter C., and R. J. Yeatman. 1931. 1066 and All That: A Memorable History of England. (Bound with And Now All This.) New York: Blue Ribbon Books, 1932.

Skinner, Quentin. 1998. Liberty Before Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Smith, Adam. 1759, 1790. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Glasgow Edition. Oxford University Press. D. D. Raphael and A. L. Macfie, eds. Reprinted Indianapolis: Liberty Classics, 1976, 1982.

Swedberg, Richard. 2009. Tocqueville’s Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Temple, Sir William. 1672. Observations upon the United Provinces of the Netherlands. G. N. Clark, ed. and intro. At http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Observations_upon_the_United_Provinces_of_the_Netherlands

Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1856 (1858). The Old Régime and the French Revolution. Trans. S. Gilbert. Garden City, New York: Anchor Doubleday, 1955.

Wells, John, and Douglas Wills. 2000. “Revolution, Restoration, and Debt Repudiation: The Jacobite Threat to England’s Institutions and Economic Growth.” Journal of Economic History 60 (June): 418-441.

Wink, André. 2003. “India: Muslim Period and Mughal Empire.” In Mokyr, ed., Oxford Encyclopedia of Economic History.