Berk, Mehmet Gokhan (2005): The Concept of Neighbourhood in Contemporary Residential Environments: An Investigation of Occupants' Perception.
Download (294kB) | Preview
The dwelling occupant satisfaction is related to the efficiency of the combination of numerous factors stemming from the qualitative and quantitative aspects of the various components of the residential environment. Those components exist at a whole scale ranging from an interior space within the housing unit to the whole urban environment. This study aimed to explore the immediate social and physical environment around the dwelling unit, which is often referred to as “neighbourhood”. In addition to the physical space that the concept reminds, the term neighbourhood is also used to describe a socially distinguished area depending on residents’ perception. In the traditional sense, this physical space is outlined with virtual boundaries that are traced differently in the minds of each individual according to the life style and type of social interaction and the type of use of the physical environment. The perceptions of residents’ in relation with this neighbourhood area are also affected with both physical and social characteristics of the concerned environment. This paper aimed to investigate the situation of the neighbourhood concept in contemporary urban residential environments by making use of the data obtained from two distinct independent housing researches conducted in Turkey. The analysis and evaluation of the findings together with an overview of the literature reflecting the traditional and contemporary neighbourhood concepts in Turkish residential environments, reveals that changes are about to occur in the definition, creation and experiencing of the neighbourhood issue. The evaluation of the literature, manifestos and approaches of most housing institutions and policy builders in the contemporary world expose a rather increasing interest to the issue of neighbourhood as the concept constitutes an important component of residential satisfaction. The findings of this study indicate that the neighbourhood feeling in contemporary urban environments is now less dependent on the sharing of common close physical residential environment due to housing initiatives driven by liberal / random land use options, financial viability and profitability. The benefits expected of the use of the close physical environment is disregarded due to possibilities obtained with increasing mobility and transportation facilities. The remote activities and life styles of dwelling occupants become the basic factors that shape the social environment. The segregation of the close social environment from the close physical environment is a major source for residential environment dissatisfaction. A conclusion drawn from the findings is that the physical properties of the close built environment may act as sources of dissatisfaction if the residents’ perception of neighbourhood notion is disregarded during residential environment design. Hints to increase dwelling occupants’ satisfaction from the residential environment lies in redefining the neighbourhood concept through creating adequate, functioning, distinct, value added common spaces that ease admittance and social interaction. However, those spaces shall be a part of the urban tissue. The long-term effects of physical segregation, clustering of the residential environments, creating of sprawl type settlements shall be re-evaluated.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||The Concept of Neighbourhood in Contemporary Residential Environments: An Investigation of Occupants' Perception|
|Keywords:||Housing, Residential Environment, Neighbourhood, Occupant Satisfaction|
|Subjects:||R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R0 - General
R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R0 - General > R00 - General
R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R2 - Household Analysis > R20 - General
|Depositing User:||Gokhan Berk|
|Date Deposited:||05. May 2010 05:41|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 01:06|
Apak, S., Ülken, G., & Ünlü A. (2001). Evaluation of “Feeling of Security” in a New Mass Housing Compound in Istanbul, in Garciá-Mira, R., Sabucedo, J.M. and Romay, J. (eds.), Culture, Quality of Life - Problems and Challenges for the New Millennium (IAPS 17 Conference Proceedings), 23-27 July 2002, pp. 421-422
Cengiz Bektaş, (2001). Halk Yapı Sanatı (People’s Art of Building), Ankara, Literatür.
D.I.E. (Turkish State Institute of Statistics) (2004). 1999 Türkiye Konut Araştırması - Türkiye (1999 Turkish Housing Survey - Turkey), Ankara, Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü Matbaası
D.I.E. (Turkish State Institute of Statistics) (2004). 1999 Türkiye Konut Araştırması – İl Merkezleri (1999 Turkish Housing Survey – Province Centres), Ankara, Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü Matbaası
Duany, A., Zyberk-Plater E., & Alminana R. (2003) The New Civic Art: Elements of Town Planning, New York, Rizzoli
E. Olcay İmamoğlu. (1992). Psikolojik Açıdan İnsan-Çevre İlişkileri (Psychological Aspects of Human-Environment Relations) in Keleş, R. (ed.), İnsan Çevre Toplum (Human Environment Society), Ankara, İmge, pp. 287-308.
İmamoğlu, V., İmamoğlu O., & Pamir H. (1996). İnsan, Evi ve Çevresi: Ankara’da Bir Toplu Konut Araştırması (People, Homes and Environments: A Survey of Housing Estates in Ankara), Ankara, Administration of Public Housing Publications
İlber Ortaylı, (1999). İmparatorluğun En Uzun Yüzyılı (The longest century of the Empire), İstanbul, İletişim.
Rıfat Özdemir, (1986). XIX. Yüzyılın İlk Yarısında Ankara (Ankara in the first half of XIXth Century), Ankara, T.C. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı Yayınları.
Haluk Pamir. (1979). Mahremiyet Kavramı ile Kişisel ve Toplumsal Düzen İlişkileri (The Relations Between the Concept of Privacy and Individual, Social Order) in Pultar, M. (ed.), Çevre, Yapı ve Tasarım (Environment, Building and Design), Ankara, Ortadoğu Teknik Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi Baskı İşliği, pp. 89-106.
André Raymond (1995). Osmanlı Döneminde Arap Kentleri (Arabic Cities in the Ottoman Period), Istanbul, Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları
Ruşen Keleş (2001). Squatting Problems and Policies in a Social Welfare State: The Case of Turkey. Habitat Debate 7 (3) 14-18
Ökten, A., Şengezer, B., Hökelek, S. (2003). Muhtarlık ve Mahalle: Katılıma İlişkin Düşünceler ve Öneriler (Neighbourhood and Administration: Ideas and Proposals Related to Participation). Mimarlık 40 (313) 61-65
TBMM –Turkish Parliament, Information about the Law Drafts (2004) Available: http://www.tbmm.gov.tr/develop/owa/tasari_teklif_sd.onerge_bilgileri?kanunlar_sira_no=26516
TOKİ – Housing Development Administration of Turkey, Major Recent Government Policies in Housing and Urbanization (2005) Available: http://www.toki.gov.tr/english/recent.asp
WHO – World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe (2004). The WHO Approach to Housing and Health. Available: http://www.euro.who.int/Housing/Activities/20041012_1