Niu, Yongzhi (2010): Tax audit impact on voluntary compliance.
Download (313Kb) | Preview
This study examines the tax audit impact on voluntary compliance. It is different from those in the literature in several ways. First, models were built exclusively for investigating the voluntary compliance behavior shifts after a firm is audited. Second, apart from the theoretical approach and laboratory experiment approach used in the literature, this study applied the difference-in-differences non-experimental approach. Third, historical population data of a New York State economic sector were used in this study instead of experimental data or randomly selected sample data often used in the literature. The results of both Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) and Time Series Cross Section (TSCS) autoregressive modeling methods are presented. The results of both methods suggest that after an audit, a firm would report a higher sales growth rate. The TSCS approach shows that in the year of the audit, a typical firm would report a sales growth rate which is 2.63 percentage points higher than a firm that was not audited. The percentage would decline by a rate of 1/3 each year thereafter. The findings suggest that the audit productivity derived in many research papers, where only the direct audit collections are considered, may be underestimated. The results of this research may provide policy makers with extra incentives to strengthening the audit efforts to generate more revenues.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Tax audit impact on voluntary compliance|
|English Title:||Tax audit impact on voluntary compliance|
|Keywords:||tax; audit; impact; voluntary compliance; difference-in-differences;|
|Subjects:||H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H29 - Other
H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H26 - Tax Evasion
|Depositing User:||Yongzhi Niu|
|Date Deposited:||11. May 2010 19:04|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 04:17|
REFERENCES Allingham, Michael, and Agnar Sandmo. 1972. “Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis,” Journal of Public Economics, 1(3-4): 323-338.
Alm, James, Betty Jackson, and Michael McKee. 1992(1). “Estimating the Determinants of Taxpayer Compliance with Experimental Data,” National Tax Journal, 45(1): 107-144.
Alm, James, Betty Jackson, and Michael McKee. 1992(2). “Institutional Uncertainty and Taxpayer Compliance,” The American Economic Review, 82(4): 1018-1026.
Alm, James, and Michael McKee. 2006. “Audit Certainty, Audit Productivity, and Taxpayer Compliance,” Andrew Young School of Policy Studies Research Paper No. 06-43.
Alm, James, Michael McKee, and William Beck. 1990. “Amazing Grace: Tax Amnesties and Compliance,” National Tax Journal, 43(1): 23-37.
Beck, Paul, and Woon-Oh Jung. 1989. “Taxpayer Compliance under Uncertainty,” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 8(1): 1-27.
Bermasconi, Michele, 1998. “Tax Evasion and Orders of Risk Aversion,” Journal of Public Economics, 67 (1): 123-134. Erard, Brian, and Jonathan Feinstein. 1994. “Honesty and Evasion in the Compliance Game.” The RAND Journal of Economics, 25(1): 1-19.
Kastlunger, Barbara, Erich Kirchler, Luigi Mittone, and Julia Pitters. 2009. “Sequences of Audits, Tax Compliance, and Taxpaying Strategies,” Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(3): 405-418.
Kirchler, Erich. 2007. “The Economic Psychology of Tax Behaviour,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.