Edith Penrose’s ‘The Theory of the Growth of the Firm’ Fifty Years Later

Pitelis, Christos (2009): Edith Penrose’s ‘The Theory of the Growth of the Firm’ Fifty Years Later.

Abstract

This is an earlier draft for the introduction to the book "The theory of the growth of the firm" published by Oxford Press, 4th edition, 2009.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Penrose, Theory of the Firm, Growth
• Subjects: L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L25 - Firm Performance: Size, Diversification, and Scope; L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L21 - Business Objectives of the Firm

References

AGHION, P. and DURLAF, S.N., eds. (2005). Handbook of Economic Growth, North, Holland, Holland Press.

ANDREWS, P.W.S. (1961). Book review: The theory of the growth of the firm, The Oxford Magazine, Vol.II, No.7, 114-16.

ALCHIAN, A. and DEMSETZ, H. (1972). Production, information costs, and economic organization, American Economic Review, Vol. 62, No.5, 777-95.

AUGIER, M. and TEECE, D.J (2008). Strategy as Evolution with Design: Dynamic Capabilities and the Design and Evolution of the Business Enterprise, Organization Studies, Vol. 29, 1187-1208.

BARNEY, J. B. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage, Journal of Management, Vol. 17, No. 1, 99-120.

BARNEY, J. B. (2001). Is the resource-based ‘view’ a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26, No. 1, 41-56.

BAUMOL, W. J. (1959). Business Behaviour, Value and Growth, New York, Macmillan.

BAUMOL, W.J. (1962). On the theory of the expansion of the firm, American Economic Review, Vol. 52, 1078-87.

BODDEWYN J. J. 2003. Understanding and advancing the concept of ‘nonmarket’, Business and Society, Vol. 42, No. 3, 297-327.

BUCKLEY, P. J. and CASSON, M. (1976). The Future of Multinational Enterprise, London, Macmillan. 43

BUCKLEY, P. J. and CASSON, M. (2007). Edith Penrose’s theory of the growth of the firm and the strategic management of multinational enterprises, Management International Review, Vol. 47, No. 2, 151-74.

CHANDLER, A. D. (1962). Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

CHANDLER, A. D. (1977). The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business, Cambridge, MA, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

CHANDLER, A. D. (1990). Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism, Cambridge, MA, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press

CLARKSON, M. B. E. ed. (1998). Introduction, in The Corporation and Its Stakeholders: Classic and Contemporary Readings. M.B.E.

Clarkson, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 1-9.

COASE, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm, Economica, Vol. 4, 386-405.

CONNELL, C. M. (2007). Discerning a mentor's role: The influence of Fritz Machlup on Edith Penrose and The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Journal of Management History, Vol. 13, No. 3, 228-39.

Contributions to Political Economy. (1999). Vol. 18 Issue 1. Special Issue on Edith Penrose.

COWLING, K. (1982). Monopoly Capitalism, London, Macmillan. CYERT, R. M. and MARCH, J. G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall.

DEMSETZ, H. (1973). Industry structure, market rivalry, and public policy, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 16, 1-9.

DEMSETZ, H. (1995). The Economics of the Business Firm: Seven Critical Commentaries. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.

DOZ, Y. SANTOS, J. and WILLIAMSON, P. (2001). From Global to Metanational, Boston, MA, Harvard Business School Press.

DUNNING, J. H. (1988). The eclectic paradigm of international production: A restatement and some possible extensions, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 19, 1-31.

DUNNING, J. H. (2001). The eclectic (OLI) paradigm of international production: Past, present and future, International Journal of the Economics of Business, Vol. 8, No. 2, 44 173-90.

DUNNING, J. H. (2003). The contribution of Edith Penrose to international business scholarship, Management International Review, Vol. 43, No. 1, 3–19.

DUNNING, J. H. (2005). ‘Towards a New Paradigm of Development: Implications for the Determinants of International Business Activity’, Universities of Reading and Rutgers, mimeo.

DUNNING, J. H. and LUNDAN, S. M. (2008). The MNE as a creator, fashioner and respondent to institutional change, in The Multinational Firm, edited by S.COLLINSON and G. MORGAN. Oxford, Blackwell.

DUNNING, J. H. and PITELIS, C. N. (2008). Stephen Hymer's contribution to international business scholarship: An assessment and extension, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 39, No. 1, 167-76.

FOSS, N. J. (1999). Edith Penrose, economics and strategic management, Contributions of Political Economy, Vol. 18, 87-104.

FOSS, N., KLEIN, P., KOR, Y. and MAHONEY, J. (2008). Entrepreneurship, subjectivism, and the resource-based view: Toward a new synthesis, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, Vol. 2, 73-94.

FRANSMAN, M. (1994) Information, knowledge, vision and theories of the firm, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 3, No. 3, 713-57.

GANDER, J. P. (1991). Managerial intensity, firm size, and growth, Managerial and Decision Economics, Vol. 12, No. 3, 261–6.

GEORGIADIS, A. and PITELIS, C.N. ‘Strategic Human Resource Practices and Value Creation Through Innovation: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment’, London School of Economics and University of Cambridge, mimeo.

GRANOVETTER, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 91, No. 3, 481-510.

GROSS, R. D. (1990). Key Studies in Psychology. London, Hodder & Stoughton, pp. 126-9.

GROSSMAN, S. and HART, O. (1986). The costs and benefits of ownership: a theory of vertical and lateral integration, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 94, No. 4, 691–718.

HART, O. (1988). Incomplete contracts and the theory of the firm, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Vol. 8, 561-81. 45

HART, O. (1995). Firms, Contracts, and Financial Structure, Oxford, Clarendon.

HART, O. and MOORE, J. (1990). Property rights and the nature of the firm, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 98, 1119-1158.

HAYEK, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society, American Economic Review, Vol. 35, No. 4, 519-30.

HELFAT, C. FINKELSTEIN, S. MITCHELL, W. PETERAF, M. SINGH, H. TEECE, D. and WINTER, S.G. (2007). Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations, Oxford, Blackwell.

HOLMSTROM, B. 1999. The firm as a subeconomy, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, Vol. 15, 74-102.

HUNT, S. D. (2000). A General Theory of Competition: Resources, Competences, Productivity, Economic Growth, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications.

HYMER, S. H. (1960/1976). The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Foreign Direct Investment, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

HYMER, S. H. (1970). The efficiency (contradictions) of multinational corporations, The American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, Vol. 60, No. 2, 441-8.

JENSEN, M. C. and MECKLING, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, 304-60. Journal of Management Studies, (2004). Vol. 41, No. 1.

KAY, N. and PITELIS, C. N. (2009). ‘On the Nature of Forms of Economic Organization and “Clusters”: Some Potential for Cross-Fertilization’, Nottingham University Business School and University of Cambridge, mimeo.

KOGUT, B. and ZANDER, U. (1993). Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation, Journal of International Business Studies, Fourth Quarter, 625-45.

KOR Y. Y. and MAHONEY, J. T. (2000). Penrose’s resource-based approach: The process and product of research creativity, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 37, No. 1, 99-139.

KOR, Y. Y. and MAHONEY, J. T. (2004). Edith Penrose's (1959) contributions to the resource-based view of strategic management, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 41, No. 1, 183-91.

KREPS, D. (1990). A Course in Microeconomic Theory. Essex, Harvester Wheatsheaf. 46

KRUGMAN, P., ed. (1986). Strategic Trade Policy and the New International Economics, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

KRUGMAN, P. (1990). Rethinking International Trade, Cambridge, MA,

LANGLOIS, R. N. and ROBERTSON, P. L. (1995). Firms, Markets and Economic Change, London, Routledge.

LOASBY, B.J. (1999). The significance of Penrose’s theory for the development of economics, Contributions to Political Economy, Vol. 19, 31-46

LUCAS, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development, Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 22, No. 1, 3-42.

MACHLUP, F. (1951). Foreword, The Economics of the International Patent System, Baltimore, MD, John Hopkins Press, pp. vii-ix

MACHLUP, F. (1962). The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.

MACHLUP, F. and PENROSE, E. T. (1950). The patent controversy in the nineteenth century, Journal of Economic History, Vol. 10, No. 1, 1-29.

MAHONEY, T. J. (2005). Economic Foundations of Strategy, Thousand Oaks, CA, SAGE Publications Inc.

MAHONEY, J. T. 2006. ‘Towards a Stakeholder Theory of Strategic Management’ University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, mimeo.

MALMGREN, H. B. (1960). How long is the long run?, The Economic Journal, Vol. 70, No. 287, 412-15.

Management International Review. (2007) Vol. 47 Issue 2. Special issue on Edith Penrose and the Future of the Multinational Enterprise.

Managerial and Decision Economics. (2005), Vol. 26, No. 2. Special Issue on Edith Penrose's Contribution to Economics and Strategy.

MARGLIN, S. (1974). What do bosses do? The origins and functions of hierarchy in capitalist production, Review of Radical Political Economics, Vol. 6, 60-112.

MARRIS, R. L. (1961). Review of The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Economic Journal, Vol. 71,144–8 47

MARRIS, R. (1964). The Economic Theory of ‘Managerial’ Capitalism, London, Macmillan.

MARRIS, R. (1987). Penrose, Edith Tilton, in the New Palgrave, A Dictionary of Economics, London, Macmillan, 831.

MARRIS, R. (1999) Edith Penrose and economics, Contributions to Political Economy, Vol. 18, 47-65.

MARRIS, R. (2002) Edith Penrose and economics, in The Growth of the Firm, edited by C. N. PITELIS, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 61-81. MASTEN, S. E. (1996). Empirical research in transaction cost economics, in Transaction Costs Economics and Beyond, edited by J. GROENEWEGEN, Dordrecht, Kluwer, 43-64.

McGAHAN, A. M. and PORTER, M. E. (1997). How much does industry matter, really?, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 1, No. 18,15-30.

MILGRAM, S. (1963). Behavioural study of obedience, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, Vol. 67, 371-8. (in R. D. Gross ed. Key Studies in Psychology. Hodder & Stoughton, London, 116-129).

MILGROM, P. and ROBERTS, J. (1992). Economics, Organization and Management, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall.

NAIR, A. TRENDOWSKI, J. and JUDGE, W. (2008). The theory of the growth of the firm by Edith T. Penrose, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 33, No. 4, 13-16.

NELSON, R. and WINTER, S. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.

NORTH, D. C. (1981). Structure and Change in Economic History, London & New York, Norton. Organization Science. (1996). Vol. 7 Issue 5, Sep/Oct96. Organization Science. (2003). Vol. 14. Issue 1, Jan/Feb03, Special Issue on Trust in an Organizational Context.

Organization Science. (2007). Vol 18. Issue 3. May/Jun07. Special Issue on Behavioral Theory of the Firm.

Organization Studies. (2008). Vol. 29 Issue 8&9. Special Issue on The Metamorphosis of (the Theory of) the Firm. 48

PANAGOPOULOS, A. and PITELIS, C. N. (2009). Innovation governance for value capture – The problem and a simple model-based solution, International Journal of Strategic Change Management, forthcoming.

PARKIN, M. and KING, D. (1992). Economics, Wokingham, Addison Wesley.

PENROSE, E.T. (1950). The patent controversy in the nineteenth century, Journal of Economic History, Vol. 10, 1-29.

PENROSE E. T. (1951). The Economics of the International Patent System, Baltimore, MD, John Hopkins Press.

PENROSE, E. T. (1955). Research on the business firms: Limits to growth and size of firms, American Economic Review, Vol. 45, No. 2, 531-43.

PENROSE, E. T. (1956). Foreign investment and the growth of the firm, Economic Journal, Vol. 66, 220-35.

PENROSE, E.T. (1959/1995). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, 3rd edn, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

PENROSE, E. T. (1960). The growth of the firm: A case study: The Hercules Powder Company, Business History Review, Vol. 34, No. 1, 1–23.

PENROSE, E. T. (1962). Some problems of policy towards direct private foreign investment in developing countries, Middle East Economic Papers, Lebanon, American Research Bureau, American University of Beirut, 121-39.

PENROSE, E. T. (1964). Monopoly and competition in the international petroleum industry, in The Yearbook of World Affairs, Vol. 18, London, Stevens.

PENROSE E. T. (1973). International patenting and the less developed countries, Economic Journal, Vol. 83, 768–86.

PENROSE E. T. (1985). The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years later, Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis: Studia Oeconomicae Negotiorum (Uppsala Lectures in Business), vol. 20, 1-16.

PENROSE, E. T. (1987). Multinational corporations, in The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, London, Macmillan, 562–4.

PENROSE, E. T. (1989). History, the social sciences and economic theory with special reference to multinational enterprise, in Multinational Enterprise in Historical Perspective, edited by A. Teichova, M. Levy-Leboyer and H. Nussbaum, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 49

PENROSE, E. T. (1990). Dumping, ‘unfair’ competition and multinational corporations, Japan and the World Economy, Vol. 1, 181-7.

PENROSE, E. T. (1996). Growth of the firm and networking, in International Encyclopaedia of Business and Management, London, Routledge.

PENROSE, E. (2008). Strategy/Organization and the metamorphosis of the large firm, Organization Studies, Vol. 29, 1117-24.

PENROSE, P. and PITELIS, C.N. (1999). ‘Edith Elura Tilton Penrose: Life, contribution and influence, Contributions to Political Economy, Vol. 18, 3-22.

PERROW, C. (1986). Complex organizations: A critical essay, 3rd edn, New York, McGraw Hill.

PITELIS, C. N. (1991). Market and Non-Market Hierarchies, Oxford, Basil Blackwell.

PITELIS, C. N. (2002). The Growth of the Firm: The Legacy of Edith Penrose, edited by C. N. PITELIS,, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

PITELIS, C. N. (2005). Edith Penrose, organizational economics and (business) strategy: An assessment and extension, Managerial and Decision Economics, Vol. 26, No. 2, 67- 82.

PITELIS, C. N. (2004). Edith Penrose and the resource-based view of (international) business strategy, International Business Review, Vol. 13, No. 4, 523–32.

PITELIS, C. (2007A). Edith Penrose and a learning-based perspective on the MNE and OLI, Management International Review, Vol. 47, No. 2, 207-19.

PITELIS, C. (2007B). A behavioral resource-based view of the firm: the synergy of Cyert and March (1963) and Penrose (1959), Organization Science, Vol. 18, No. 3, 478-90.

PITELIS, C. N. and PSEIRIDIS, A. (1999). Transaction costs versus resource value?, Journal of Economic Studies, Vol. 26, No. 3, 221-40.

PITELIS, C. N. and SUGDEN, R. (2002). Preface, Contributions to Political Economy, Vol. 21, No. 1, 1-4.

PITELIS, C. N. and WAHL, M. (1998). Edith Penrose: Pioneer of stakeholder theory, Long Range Planning, Vol. 31, No. 2, 252-61.

PITELIS, C. N. (2000). A theory of (the growth of) the transnational firm, Contributions to Political Economy, Vol. 19, No. 1, 71-89. 50

PITELIS, C. N. (2009A). The sustainable competitive advantage and catching-up of nations: Fdi, clusters, and the liability (asset) of smallness?, Management International Review, forthcoming.

PITELIS, C. N. (2009B). ‘The Co-Genesis, Co-Determination and Co-Evolution of Value Capture and Value Creation’, University of Cambridge, mimeo.

PITELIS, C. N. and TEECE, D. J (2009). The nature and essence of the firm, European Management Review, Spring.

PORTER, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy, London, Macmillan.

PORTER, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, New York, The Free Press.

PORTER, M. E. (1987). From competitive advantage to corporate strategy, Harvard Business Review, May/June, 43-59.

PORTER, M. E. (1999). Michael Porter on competition, The Antitrust Bulletin, Winter, 841-80.

POWELL, W. W. and DIMAGGIO, P. J. (1991). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

PRENDERGAST, C. (1999). The provision of incentives in firms, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 37, No.1, 7–63.

PRIEM, L. R. and BUTLER, J. E. (2001A). Is the resource-based ‘view’ a useful perspective for strategic management research?, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26, No. 1, 22-40.

PRIEM, L. R. and BUTLER, J. E. (2001B). Tautology in the resource-based view and the implications of externally determined resource value: Further comments, Academy of Management Review Vol. 26, No. 1, 57-66.

RICHARDSON, G. (1972). The Organisation of Industry, Economic Journal, Vol. 82, 883-896.

RICHARDSON, G. B. (1999). Mrs Penrose and neoclassical theory, Contributions to Political Economy, Vol. 18, 23-30.

ROMER, P. M. (1986). Increasing Returns and Long-run Growth, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 94, No. 5, 1002-37.

ROMER, P. M. (1990). Endogenous Technological Change, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 98, 71-101. 51

RUGMAN, A. M. and VERBEKE, A. (2002). Edith Penrose’s Contribution to the Resource-Based View of Strategic Management, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 23, 769-80.

SCHUMPETER, E. ed. (1940). The Industrialisation of Japan and Manchukuo: 1930- 1940, New York, MacMillan.

SCHUMPETER, J. (1942/1987). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, 5th edn, London, Unwin Hyman.

SELZNICK, P. (1957). Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation, Berkley, CA, University of California Press.

SEN, A. K. (1999). Development As Freedom, New York, Alfred Knopf.

SHEN, T. Y. (1970). Economies of scale, Penrose effect, growth of plants and their size distribution, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 78, Part 1, July/August, 702-16.

SIMON, H. A. 1995. Organisations and markets, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 5, No. 3, 273-95.

SLATER, M. (1980A). Foreword, in E. PENROSE, The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, New York, Sharpe, pp. vii-xxx.

SLATER, M. (1980B). The managerial limitations to a firm’s rate of growth, Economic Journal, Vol. 90, 520-8.

SMITH, A. (1976, CAMPBELL, R.H. and A.S. SKINNER (eds.); first pub. 1776) An Enquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Oxford, Clarendon Press. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, No.10, Winter special issue.

TEECE, D. J. (1977). Technology Transfer by Multinational Firms: The Resource Cost of Transferring Technological Know-how, The Economic Journal, Vol. 87, 242-61.

TEECE, D. J. (1982). Towards an Economic Theory of the Multiproduct Firm, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 3, No. 1, 39-63.

TEECE, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 28, No.13, 1319-1350.

TEECE, D. J. (2008). ‘Human capital and the firm of the future: Literati, numerati, and entrepreneurs in the 21st century business enterprise’, University of California, Berkeley, mimeo. 52

TEECE, D. J. (2006). Reflections on the Hymer Thesis and the Multinational Enterprise, International Business Review, Vol. 15, No. 2, 124-39.

TEECE, D. J. and PISANO, G. (1994). The dynamic capabilities of firms, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 3, 537–56.

TEECE, D. J. PISANO, G. and SHUEN, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, 509–33.

TEECE, D. J. and PITELIS, C. N. (2009). ‘Dynamic capabilities and the nature and essence of the multinational enterprise’, Universities of California, Berkeley and Cambridge, mimeo.

TIROLE, J. (1988). The Theory of Industrial Organization, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

UZAWA, H. (1969). Time preference and the Penrose effect in a two-class model of economic growth, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 77, Part 2, September-October, 628-52.

VERBEKE, A. (2003). The Evolutionary view of the MNE and the future of internalization theory, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 34, No. 6, 498– 504.

VERBEKE, A. and YUAN, W. (2007). Entrepreneurship in multinational enterprises: A Penrosean perspective, Management International Review, Vol. 47, No. 2, 241-58

VISCUSI, W. K. VERNON, J. M. HARRINGTON, J. E. (2001). Economics of Regulation and Antitrust, 3rd edn, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

VOLPE, L. and BIFERALI, D. (2008). Edith Tilton Penrose: The theory of the growth of the firm, Journal of Management Governance, Vol. 12, 119-25.

WILLIAMSON, O. E. (1964). Economics of Discretionary Behaviour: Managerial Objectives in the Theory of the Firm, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall.

WILLIAMSON, O. E. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies: Antitrust Analysis and Implications, New York, The Free Press.

WILLIAMSON, O. E. (1981). The modern corporation: Origins, evolution, attributes, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 19, No. 4, 1537–69.

WILLIAMSON, O. E. (1996). Efficiency, power, authority and economic organization, in Transaction Costs Economics and Beyond, edited by J. GROENEWEGEN, Dordrecht, Kluwer. 53

WILLIAMSON, O. E. (1999). Strategy research: Governance and competence perspectives, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 20, 1087-108.

YOUNG, A. (1928). Increasing returns and economic progress, The Economic Journal, Vol. 28, No. 152, 527-42.