Chi, Feng and Yang, Nathan (2010): Twitter Adoption in Congress: Who Tweets First?
Download (221Kb) | Preview
Our general objective is to characterize the recent and well publicized diffusion of Twitter among politicians in the United States 111th House of Representatives. Ultimately, Barrack Obama, Facebook and peers matter when it comes to the propensity and speed of Twitter adoption. A basic analysis of the distribution of first Tweets over time reveals clustering around the President's inauguration; which holds regardless whether the adopter is Democratic or Republican, or an incumbent or newcomer. After we characterize which representatives are most likely to adopt Twitter, we confirm the widespread belief that Facebook and Twitter are indeed complementary technology. Given their perceived desire for accessible government, a surprising result is that Republicans are more likely to adopt Twitter than Democrats. Finally, using the exact dates of each adopter's first Tweet, we demonstrate that the diffusion of Twitter is faster for those representatives with a larger number of peers already using the technology, where peers are defined by two social networks: (1) Politicians representing the same state; and (2) politicians belonging to the same committees; especially so for those in committee networks. This observed behavior can be rationalized by social learning, as the instances in which the peer effects are important correspond to the cases in which social learning is relevant.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Twitter Adoption in Congress: Who Tweets First?|
|Keywords:||Communication, diffusion of technology, political marketing, social interaction, social media, social learning.|
|Subjects:||M - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting > M3 - Marketing and Advertising
D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D83 - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief
D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D85 - Network Formation and Analysis: Theory
|Depositing User:||Nathan Yang|
|Date Deposited:||11. Jun 2010 10:52|
|Last Modified:||27. Feb 2013 13:56|
Ai, C. and Norton, E (2003). Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economic Letters 80.
Brock, W. and Durlauf, S (2005). Identification of Binary Choice Models with Social Interactions. Journal of Econometrics 140.
Buera, Monge-Naranjo and Primiceri (2010). Learning the Wealth of Nations. Working paper.
Caplin, A. and Leahy, J (1998). Miracle on Sixth Avenue: Information Externalities and Search. The Economic Journal 108.
Chamley, C (2004). Rational Herds: Economic Models of Social Learning. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Chamley, C. and Gale, D (1994). Information Revelation and Strategic Delay in a Model of Investment. Econometrica 62.
Cohen, Frazzini, and Malloy (2008). The Small World of Investing: Board Connections and Mutual Fund Returns. Journal of Political Economy 116.
Cohen, Frazzini, and Malloy (2009). Sell Side School Ties. Working paper.
Cohen, L. and Malloy, C (2010). Friends in High Places: Peer Effects and Politics. Working paper.
Comm, J (2010). Twitter Power 2.0. Wiley & Sons: New Jersey.
Conley, T. and Udry, C (2010). Learning About a New Technology: Pineapple in Ghana. American Economic Review (forthcoming).
Felten, E (2009). Government online: Outreach vs. transparency. Retrieved on June 1, 2010 from http://freedom-to-tinker.com/blog/felten/government-online-outreach-vs-transparency.
Gibson et al (2003). Election Campaigning on the WWW in the USA and UK: A Comparative Analysis. Party Politics 9.
Golbeck, Grims, and Rogers (2010). Twitter Use by the U.S. Congress. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61.
Gulati, G (2004). Members of Congress and Presentation of Self on the World Wide Web. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 9.
Davezies, d'Haultfoeuille, and Fougere (2006). Identification of Peer Effects using Group Size Variation. Working paper.
Goldfarb, A. and Prince, J (2008). Internet Adoption and Usage Patterns are Different: Implications for the Digital Divide. Information Economics and Policy 20.
Bikhchandani, Hirshleifer, and Welch (1992). A Theory of Fads, Fashion, Custom and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades. Journal of Political Economy 100.
Honeycutt, C. and Herring, S (2009). Beyond Microblogging: Conversation and Collaboration via Twitter. Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
Jackson, M. Social and Economic Networks. Princeton University Press: New Jersey.
Jansen et. al (2009). Twitter Power: Tweets as Electronic Word of Mouth. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60.
Java et. al (2007). Why We Twitter: Understanding Microblogging Usage and Communities. Proceedings of the Joint 9th WEBKDD.
Krishnamurthy, Gill and Arlitt (2008). A Few Chirps About Twitter. Proceedings of the first workshop on Online social networks.
Lassen, D. and Brown, A (2010). Twitter: The Electoral Connection? Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.
Lipinski, D. and Neddenriep, G (2004). Using "New" Media to Get "Old" Media Coverage: How Members of Congress Utilize their Web Sites to Court Journalists. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 9.
Manski, C (2000). Economic Analysis of Social Interactions. Journal of Economic Perspectives 14.
Manski, C (1993). Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem. The Review of Economic Studies 60.
McFedries, P (2007). Technically speaking: All a-Twitter. IEEE Spectrum 44.
Moretti, E (2010). Social Learning and Peer Effects in Consumption: Evidence from Movie Sales. The Review of Economic Studies (forthcoming).
Oleszek, W (2007). Congress and the Internet: Highlights. CRS Report for Congress.
Smith, A. and Rainie, L (2008). The internet and the 2008 election. PEW Internet and American Life Project.
Williams, C. and Gulati, G (2009). Social Networks in Political Campaigns: Facebook and Congressional Elections 2006, 2008. Working paper.
Williams, C. and Gulati, G (2010). Communicating with Constituents in 140 Characters or Less: Twitter and the Diffusion of Technology Innovation in the United States Congress. Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.
Available Versions of this Item
- Twitter Adoption in Congress: Who Tweets First? (deposited 11. Jun 2010 10:52) [Currently Displayed]