Jain, Varinder (2006): Political Economy of Electricity Subsidy: Evidence from Punjab. Published in: Economic and Political Weekly , Vol. 41, No. 38 (23 September 2006): pp. 4072-4080.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_240.pdf Download (62kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The electricity subsidy distribution pattern needs to be scrutinised to assess whether the policy benefits small producers, a normative argument often made while granting any input subsidy. In Punjab, this policy is found to ignore equity considerations while granting non-discriminatory electricity subsidies to the agricultural sector. This study highlights the existence of disparities in the flow of electricity subsidy between the advanced and backward regions. While the medium and large farmers reap the major benefits of the subsidy, the poor small farmers, especially in the backward areas, remain excluded due to their non-possession of electricity connections. In a nutshell, this paper questions the justification for introducing such a policy and puts forward the case for user charges based on open access to electricity.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Political Economy of Electricity Subsidy: Evidence from Punjab |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Political economy; Electricity Subsidy; Agriculture |
Subjects: | P - Economic Systems > P2 - Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies > P26 - Political Economy ; Property Rights H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H23 - Externalities ; Redistributive Effects ; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies |
Item ID: | 240 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Varinder Jain |
Date Deposited: | 08 Oct 2006 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 15:35 |
References: | Bathla, Seema (1997): ‘Groundwater Sustainability: A Case Study of the Ludhiana District’, Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 52 (3), p 546. Becker, Gary S (1983): ‘A Theory of Competition among Pressure Groups for Political Influence’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98 (3), pp 371-400. Dasgupta, Biplab (1997): ‘The New Political Economy’, Economic and Political Weekly, 32 (4), pp PE-13-26. Dhawan, B D (1993): ‘Groundwater Depletion in Punjab’, Economic and Political Weekly, 28 (44), pp 2397. Dubash, N K and S C Rajan (2001): ‘Power Politics: Process of Power Sector Reforms in India’, Economic and Political Weekly, 36 (35), pp 3367- 90, September 1. Ghosh, Jayati (1995): ‘State Intervention in the Macroeconomy’ in Macro-economics, edited by Prabhat Patnaik, Oxford University Press, New Delhi. Gill, Anita (2004): ‘Interlinked Agrarian Credit Markets: Case Study of Punjab’, Economic and Political Weekly, 39 (33), pp 3741-51. Howes, S and R Murgai (2003): ‘Incidence of Agricultural Power Subsidies: An Estimate’, Economic and Political Weekly, 38 (16), pp 1533-35. Jain, Varinder (2003): Performance of the Punjab State Electricity Board and Distribution of Electricity Subsidy to Agriculture, unpublished M Phil Dissertation, Centre for Development Studies, Thiruvananthapuram. Joshi, P K and N K Tyagi (1991): ‘Sustainability of Existing Farming System in Punjab and Haryana: Some Issues on Groundwater Use’, Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 46 (3), p 412. Kalecki, M (1967): ‘Observations on Social and Economic Aspects of ‘Intermediate Regimes’, Coexistence, 4(1), pp 1-5, Reprinted in Selected Essays on the Economic Growth of the Socialist and the Mixed Economy, Cambridge University Press, 1972. Karnik, Ajit and Mala Lalvani (1996): ‘Interest Groups, Subsidies and Public Goods: Farm Lobby in Indian Agriculture’, Economic and Political Weekly, 31 (13), p 818. Mukherji, Partha Nath (1998): ‘The Farmers’ Movement in Punjab: Politics of Pressure Groups and Pressure of Party Politics’, Economic and Political Weekly, 33 (18), pp 1043-48. Namboodiri, N V (1982): ‘The Rationale of Input Subsidies: The Case of Fertiliser’, Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 37 (3), p 280. Osborne, M and A Silvinski (1996): ‘A Model of Political Competition with Citizen-Candidates’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111 (1), pp 65-96. Reddy, K S (1992): ‘Who Benefits from Agricultural Subsidies? The Case of Andhra Pradesh’, Margin, 25 (1), pp 64-72. Sant, G and S Dixit (1996): ‘Beneficiaries of IPS Subsidy and Impact of Tariff Hike’, Economic and Political Weekly, 31 (51), pp 3315-21, December 21. Singh, Amarjit (1998): ‘Economic and Policy Dimensions of Irrational Use of Electricity in Agriculture in India’, Indian Journal of Economics, 79 (313), October, pp 187-93. Singh, Baldev (1992): ‘Groundwater Resources and Agricultural Development Strategy: Punjab Experience’, Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 47 (1), p 105. Singh, Chottan and Puran Chand (1986): ‘Inequalities in the Use of Agricultural Input Subsidies in India’, Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 41 (4), pp 637-38. Singh, Gurharpal (1998): ‘The Akalis and the BJP in Punjab: From Ayodhya to the 1997 Legislative Assembly Election’ in The BJP and the Compulsions of Politics in India edited by Thomas Blom Hansen and Christophe Jaffrelot, Oxford University Press, Delhi. Singh, Surender (1991): ‘Some Aspects of Groundwater Balance in Punjab’, Economic and Political Weekly, 26 (52), pp A-146. Sreenivasamurthy, D and S Bisaliah (1988): ‘Technical Innovations and Productivity Change in Agriculture’, Margin, 20 (3): pp 51-56. Subbarao, K (1985): ‘Incentive Policies and Indian Agricultural Development: Some Aspects of Regional and Social Equity’, Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 40 (4), pp 494-512. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/240 |