Kox, Henk L.M. and Rojas Romasgosa, Hugo (2010): Exports and productivity selection effects for Dutch firms.
Download (260kB) | Preview
The paper investigates whether the self-selection hypothesis and other predictions from the heterogeneous-firms trade models can explain the export participation patterns for Dutch firms in manufacturing and services. The results provide strong support for the self-selection hypothesis, according to which firms need higher productivity performance to compensate for sunk entry costs in export markets. After controlling for many firm and market characteristics we robustly find higher productivity levels for exporters. The paper also tests for the reverse causality (learning-by-exporting), but finds no empirical support for it, not even after controlling for the firm's distance to a constructed international productivity frontier. This latter result may be important for the motivation of future export promotion policies. The empirical estimates are achieved by probit regressions at the plant level and at the firm level. As a robustness test we also applied the more standard OLS panel regression estimates, which provided similar results. The paper also tested whether the productivity-export link is conditional on the sectoral market structure and multinational affiliation. Services sectors with high competition and a lower degree of product differentiation have significantly higher export productivity premia than services firms in less competitive sectors. Such differences are not found in the manufacturing sector.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Exports and productivity selection effects for Dutch firms|
|English Title:||Exports and productivity selection effects for Dutch firms|
|Keywords:||Export participation, productivity, self selection, market structure|
|Subjects:||F - International Economics > F2 - International Factor Movements and International Business > F23 - Multinational Firms; International Business
F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F12 - Models of Trade with Imperfect Competition and Scale Economies
L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance
|Depositing User:||Henk L.M. Kox|
|Date Deposited:||12. Aug 2010 21:05|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 16:23|
Albornoz, F., Calvo Pardo, H. F., Corcos, G. and Ornelas, E. (2009). Sequential Exporting, Working Paper, NHH Department of Economics.
Baldwin, R. (2005). Heterogeneous Firms and Trade: Testable and Untestable Properties of the Melitz Model, NBER Working Paper 11471, National Bureau of Economic Researh.
Bernard, A. B. and Jensen, J. B. (1995). Exporters, Jobs, and Wages in US Manufacturing: 1976-87, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics pp. 67-119.
Bernard, A. B. and Jensen, J. B. (1999). Exceptional exporter performance: cause, e¤ect, or both?, Journal of International Economics 47: 1-25.
Bernard, A. B., Jensen, J. B., Redding, S. J. and Schott, P. K. (2007), Firms in International Trade, Journal of Economic Perspectives 21(3): 105-130.
Bernard, A. B., Jensen, J. B. and Schott, P. K. (2003). Falling Trade Costs, Heterogeneous Firms, and Industry Dynamics, NBER Working Paper 9639, National Bureau of Economic Research.
Besedes, T. and Prusa, T. J. (2006). Ins, Outs, and the Duration of Trade, Canadian Journal of Economics 39(1): 266-295.
Chaney, T. (2008). Distorted Gravity: The Intensive and Extensive Margins of International Trade, American Economic Review 98(4): 1707-1721.
De Loecker, J. (2007). Do exports generate higher productivity? Evidence from Slovenia, Journal of International Economics 73(1): 69-98.
Evenson, R. E. and Westphal, L. E. (1995). Technological Change and Technology Strategy, in: J. Behrman and T. N. Srinivasan (eds.), Handbook of Development Economics, Vol. 3, North-Holland, Amsterdam, chapter 37, pp. 2209-2299.
Grossman, G. M. and Helpman, E. (1991). Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, MIT Press,Cambridge MA.
Helpman, E., Melitz, M. J. and Yeaple, S. R. (2004). Export Versus FDI with Heterogenous Firms, American Economic Review 94(1): 300-316.
International Study Group on Exports and Productivity (2008).Understanding Cross-Country Differ- ences in Exporter Premia: Comparable Evidence for 14 Countries, Review of World Economics 144(4): 596-635.
Kneller, R. and Pisu, M. (2007). The returns to exporting: evidence from UK firms, GEP Research Paper 2007/04, University of Nottingham.
Kox, H. and Rojas-Romagosa, H. (2010). Selection Effects in Exports: Heterogeneous Firms, Exports and Productivity, CPB Document, forthcoming, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, The Hague.
Mayer, T. and Ottaviano, G. I. (2007). The Happy Few: The Internationalisation of European Firms, Vol. III of Bruegel Blueprint Series, Bruegel, Brussels.
Melitz, M. J. (2003). The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity, Econometrica 71(6): 1695-1725.
Melitz, M. J. and Ottaviano, G. I. P. (2008). Market Size, Trade, and Productivity, Review of Economic Studies 75(1): 295-316.
Pisu, M. (2008). Export Destinations and Learning-by-exporting: Evidence from Belgium, Working Paper Research 140, National Bank of Belgium.
Rojas-Romagosa, H. (2010). Firm-level Exports and Productivity in The Netherlands: Report on the SFGO database, CPB Memorandum, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
Verbeek, M. (2004). A Guide to Modern Econometrics, 2nd revised edn, John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, England.
Wagner, J. (2007). Exports and Productivity: A Survey of the Evidence from Firm-level Data, World Economy 30(1): 60-82.
World Bank (1993). The East Asian Miracle, Oxford University Press, New York. World Bank (1997). World Development Report 1997, Oxford University Press, New York.
Yeaple, S. R. (2005). �A Simple Model of Firm Heterogeneity, International Trade, andWages�, Journal of International Economics 65(1): 1-20.