Shah, Khalid (2010): Analyzing the Impact of Leverage and Adjustment Costs on Various Measures of Corporate Performance: Insights from Listed Firms of Pakistan.
Download (327Kb) | Preview
This paper is a first attempt to look into the issue of the effect of leverage and adjustment costs on various measures of corporate performance for 374 non-financial firms listed on Karachi Stock Exchange of Pakistan. The Arellano and Bond dynamic panel data estimation technique (a variant of GMM) is used to capture the role of adjustment costs and the dynamic behavior of corporate performance. A panel data set spanning 1988 to 2008 is used for the purpose. The results, thus obtained, are essentially mixed. The coefficients of the adjustment variable (lagged corporate performance) are positive for ROCE (Return on capital employed) and EPS (Earnings per Share) but ironically negative for ROE (Return on Equity). Similarly the effect of leverage on ROCE is negative but insignificant and positive significant when EPS is used as a measure of corporate performance. Whereas the relationship between leverage and ROE (another measure used in the paper for corporate performance) is negative and significant which implies that high leverage force the managers to perform optimally due to higher interest burden and agency cost. The positive effect of the size of firm on performance is confirmed for all the three measures of corporate performance. Furthermore, the positive and statistically significant impact of short term liabilities implies that high short term liabilities exert pressure on corporate managers to perform efficiently in the competitive market.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Analyzing the Impact of Leverage and Adjustment Costs on Various Measures of Corporate Performance: Insights from Listed Firms of Pakistan|
|Keywords:||Corporate Performance, leverage, adjustment costs, panel data, Pakistan|
|Subjects:||G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance > G30 - General|
|Depositing User:||Shah Khalid|
|Date Deposited:||25. Aug 2010 13:48|
|Last Modified:||15. Feb 2013 21:41|
Arellano, M and Bond, S. (1991). “Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations”, the Review of Economics Studies, 58: 277-297
Balance Sheet of Joint Stock Companies Listed on the Karachi Stock Exchange, Various issues. Hsiao, C. (1995). “Benefits and Limitations of Panel Data”, Econometric Review, 4: 121-174
Jensen, M C (1986): “Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance and Takeovers”, America, Economic Review, 76, May 323-29
Jensen, M C and W Meckling (1976): “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Capital Structure”, Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-60
Majumdar, S, K. (1995): “Public, Joint and Private Sectors in Indian Industry: Evaluating Relative Performance Differences”, Economic and Political Weekly, 30, 7, M25-M32
Majumdar, S, K. (1997). “Debt, Where Is Thy Sting? Leverage and Corporate Performance”, Economic and Political Weekly, 32, M21-M24.
Modigliani, F and M H Miller (1958): “The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance, and the Theory of Investment”, American Economic Review, 48, June, 261-97
Myers, S. (1977). “Determinants of Corporate Borrowing”, Journal of Financial Economics, 5: 147-175
Nickell, S. et al. (1997). “What makes firms Perform Well?”, European Economic Review, 41: 783-796
Pushner, G. (1995). “Equity Ownership Structure, Leverage and Productivity: Empirical Evidence from Japan”. Journal of Pacific-Basin Finance, 3: 241-255.
Weill, L. (2008). “Leverage and Corporate Performance: Does Institutional Environment matter?”, Small Business Economics, 30: 251-265.