Spada, Paolo and Vreeland, James (2010): Participatory Decision Making: A Field Experiment on Manipulating the Votes.
This is the latest version of this item.
Download (465Kb) | Preview
Many believe that deliberative democracy, where individuals discuss alternatives before voting on them, should result in collectively superior outcomes because voters become better informed and decisions are justified using reason. These deliberations typically involve a moderator, however, whose role has been under-examined. We conduct a field experiment to test the effects moderators may have. Participants in a class of 107 students voted on options over their writing and exam requirements. Before voting, they participated in group discussions of about five people each with one moderator. Some (randomly assigned) moderators remained neutral throughout, while others made limited interventions, supporting a specific option. We find a substantial moderator effect. Our experiment is structured like deliberations used world-wide to make community decisions and thus should have some external validity. The results indicate that if organized interest groups had influence over moderators, they might be able to hijack a deliberative decision-making process.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Participatory Decision Making: A Field Experiment on Manipulating the Votes|
|English Title:||Participatory Decision Making: A Field Experiment on Manipulating the Votes|
|Keywords:||deliberative democracy, participatory decision making, interest group, manipulation, moderators, facilitators|
|Subjects:||D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D70 - General
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C93 - Field Experiments
|Depositing User:||Paolo Spada|
|Date Deposited:||03. Sep 2010 07:50|
|Last Modified:||16. Feb 2013 02:35|
Abers, R. 1998. From Clientelism to Cooperation: Local Government, Participatory Policy, and Civic Organizing in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Politics and Society 26:511-37.
Asch, S. E. 1948. The doctrine of suggestion, prestige, and imitation in social psychology. Psychological Review 41:258-290.
Ackerman B. 1991. We the People: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
Ackerman B., and J. Fishkin. 2004. Righting the Ship of Democracy. Legal Affairs (Jan-Feb):34-39.
Avritzer L. 2002. New Public Spheres in Brazil. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Baierle, S. G. 2007. Lutas Urbanas em Porto Alegre: entre a revolução política e o transformismo. Porto Alegre: Cidade – Centro de Assessoria e Estudos Urbanos.
Barber, B. R. 1984. Strong Democracy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Benhabib Sheila. 1992. Situating the Self. New York: Routledge.
Chambers S. 1996. Reasonable Democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.
Chambers, S. 2003. Deliberative Democratic Theory. Annual Review of Political Science 6:307-26.
Cohen, J. 1997. Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In J. F. Bohman & W. Rehg (Eds.), Deliberative democracy. Pp. 67-91. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dryzek, J. K. 2000. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dickson, Eric, Catherine Hafer, and Dimitri Landa. 2008a. Cognition and Strategy: A Deliberation Experiment. Journal of Politics 70(4): 974–89.
Dickson, Eric, Catherine Hafer, and Dimitri Landa. 2008b. Rules of Debate: Theory and Experiment. Typescript. New York University.
Farrar, Cynthia, Donald P. Green, Jennifer E. Green, David Nickerson, and Steven Shewfelt. 2006. Does Discussion Group Composition Affect Policy Preferences? Ms. Yale University.
Farrar, Cynthia, James S. Fishkin, Donald P. Green, Christian List, Robert C. Luskin, and Elizabeth Levy Paluck. 2007. Disaggregating Deliberation’s Effects. Ms. Yale University.
Fearon, James, Macartan Humphreys, and Jeremy M. Weinstein. 2009. Can Development Aid Contribute to Social Cohesion After Civil War? Evidence from a Field Experiment in Post-Conflict Liberia. American Economic Association Annual Meetings, January, San Francisco.
Fishkin, J. and Robert C. Luskin. 2005. Experimenting with a Democratic Ideal: Deliberative Polling and Public Opinion. Acta Politica 40: 284-298.
Freedman, David A.. 2008a. Randomization Does Not Justify Logistic Regression. Statistical Science 23: 237–49.
––– 2008b. On regression adjustments in experiments with several treatments. Annals of Applied Statistics 2: 176–96.
Fulwider, J. 2005. Do Moderators Matter? Answering a Jury Deliberation Challenge to Deliberative Democracy. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC.
Fung, Archon. 2004. Empowered Participation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Gaventa, J. 2006. Deepening the Deepening Democracy Debate. IDS Working Papers – 264.
Gerber, Alan S., and Donald P. Green. 2008. Field Experiments and Natural Experiments. In Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier, Henry E. Brady, and David Collier (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. New York: Oxford
Green, Donald P. 2009. Regression Adjustments to Experimental Data: Do David Freedman’s Concerns Apply to Political Science? Paper presented at the 26th annual meeting of the Society for Political Methodology, Yale University, July 23-25.
Gutmann A, and D. Thompson. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Habermas, J. 1984. Theory of Communicative Action, vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. (translated by Thomas McCarthy). Boston: Beacon Press.
Hafer, Catherine, and Dimitri Landa. 2005. Deliberation and Social Polarization. Ms. New York University.
Hafer, Catherine, and Dimitri Landa. 2007. Deliberation as Self-Discovery. Journal of Theoretical Politics 19(3): 329–60.
Humphreys, Macartan, William Masters, and Martin Sandbu. 2006. The Role of Leaders in Democratic Deliberations: Results from a Field Experiment in São Tomé and Príncipe. World Politics 58: 583-622.
Imai, K., and T. Yamamoto. 2008. Causal Inference with Differential Measurement Error: Nonparametric Identification and Sensitivity Analyses of a Field Experiment on Democratic Deliberations. Working Paper, Princeton University.
Landa, Dimitri. 2005. The Moral Economy of Deliberative Participation. Ms. New York University.
Landa, Dimitri and Adam Meirowitz. 2009. Game Theory, Information, and Deliberative Democracy. American Journal of Political Science 53 (2):427–444.
List, Christian, Robert C. Luskin, James S. Fishkin, and Iain McLean. 2006. Deliberation, Single-Peakedness, and the Possibility of Meaningful Democracy: Evidence from Deliberative Polls. PSPE Working Paper No. 1.
Luskin, Robert C., James S. Fishkin, and Kyu S. Hahn. 2007. Deliberation and Net Attitude Change. Paper presented at the ECPR General Conference, Pisa, Italy.
Mansuri, Ghazala and Vijayendra Rao. 2004. Community-Based and -Driven Development: A Critical Review. The World Bank Research Observer 19 (1):1-39.
Marquetti, A. 2003. Participação e redistribuição: o orçamento participativo em Porto Alegre. In: Avritzer, L.; Navarro, Z. (Org.). A inovação democrática no Brasil. Pp. 129-156. São Paulo, Cortez Editora.
Marquetti, Adalmir A., and Duilio de Avila Bêrni. 2006. Democracia Participativa, Performance Fiscal e Distribuição: a evidência dos municípios gaúchos. In: Terceiro Encontro de Economia Gaúcha. Porto Alegre.
Meirowitz, Adam. 2007. In Defense of Exclusionary Deliberation: Communication and Voting with Private Beliefs and Values. Journal of Theoretical Politics 19(3): 301–27.
Mendelberg, Tali. 2002. The deliberative citizen: Theory and evidence. Political Decision Making, Deliberation and Participation 6: 151–193.
Morrison, K. and Singer, M. 2007. Inequality and Deliberative Development: Revisiting Bolivia Experience with the PRSP. Development Policy Review 25 (6): 721-740.
Muhlberger, P. 2007 Strategic and Communicative Rationality in a Deliberative Field Experiment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Palmer House Hotel, Chicago, IL.
Mutz, Diana C. 2008. Is Deliberative Democracy a Falsifiable Theory? Annual Review of Political Science 11:521–38.
Myers, C. D. 2010. Information Sharing in Small Group Deliberation. Ms. Princeton University.
Nino, C. S. 1996. The Constitution of Deliberative Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
O’Brennan, J. 2004. Ireland’s National Forum on Europe: Elite Deliberation Meets Popular Participation. Journal of European Integration 26 (2): 171-189.
Pateman, C. 1970. Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Platteau, Jean-Philippe and Frédéric Gaspart. 2003. The Risk of Resource Misappropriation in Community-Driven Development. World Development 31 (10):1687-1703.
Risse, Thomas. 2000. “Let’s Argue!”: Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization 54 (1):1–39. Shapiro, I. 2003. The State of Democratic Theory. Princeton University Press.
Sanders, L. M. 1997. Against deliberation. Political Theory 25, 3, 347–376.
Sunstein, Cass R. 2000. Why Groups Go to Extremes. The Yale Law Journal 110 (1):71-119.
Wampler, B. 2007. Participatory Budgeting in Brazil: Contestation, Cooperation, and Accountability. Pennsylvania State University Press.
Winters, Matthew S. 2007. Explaining Selection into Indonesia’s Kecamatan Development Program. Paper Prepared for Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.
World Bank. 2008. Toward a More Inclusive and Effective Participatory Budget in Porto Alegre Vol I. Report No. 40144-BR. Washington DC: World Bank.
Young, I. M. 2002. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Available Versions of this Item
Participatory Decision Making: A Field Experiment on Manipulating the Votes. (deposited 23. Jul 2010 03:06)
- Participatory Decision Making: A Field Experiment on Manipulating the Votes. (deposited 03. Sep 2010 07:50) [Currently Displayed]