Thams, Andreas (2007): Fiscal policy rules in practice.
Download (283Kb) | Preview
This paper analyzes German and Spanish fiscal policy using simple policy rules. We choose Germany and Spain, as both are Member States in the European Monetary Union (EMU) and underwent considerable increases in public debt in the early 1990s. We focus on the question, how fiscal policy behaves under rising public debt ratios. It is found that both Germany and Spain generally exhibit a positive relationship between government revenues and debt. Using Markov-switching techniques, we show that both countries underwent a change in policy behavior in the light of rising debt/output ratios at the end of the 1990s. Interestingly, this change in policy behavior differs in its characteristics across the two countries and seems to be non-permanent in the case of Germany.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Institution:||Free University Berlin|
|Original Title:||Fiscal policy rules in practice|
|Keywords:||Fiscal policy; policy rule; policy interaction; sustainability of fiscal policy; regime switches|
|Subjects:||E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, Macroeconomic Policy, and General Outlook > E61 - Policy Objectives; Policy Designs and Consistency; Policy Coordination
E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, Macroeconomic Policy, and General Outlook > E62 - Fiscal Policy
E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, Macroeconomic Policy, and General Outlook > E65 - Studies of Particular Policy Episodes
|Depositing User:||Andreas Thams|
|Date Deposited:||03. Apr 2007|
|Last Modified:||19. Feb 2013 04:04|
Afonso, Antonio (2002): “Disturbing the Fiscal Theory of the Price Level: Can it Fit the EU-15?,” Working Paper No. 1/2002/DE/CISEP, Department of Economics, Technical University of Lisbon.
Bohn, H. (1998): “The Behaviour of U.S. Public Debt and Deficits,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(3), 949-63.
Davig, Troy and Eric M. Leeper (2005): “Fluctuating Macro Policies and the Fiscal Theory,” NBER Working Paper No. 11212, National Bureau of Economic Research.
Fatas, Antonio and Ilian Mihov (2001): “Government Size and Automatic Stabilizers: International and Intranational Evidence,” Journal of International Economics, 55(1), 3-28.
Gali, Jordi and Roberto Perotti (2003): “Fiscal policy and monetary integration in Europe,” Economic Policy, 18(37), 533-72.
Hamilton, James D. (1989): “A new Approach to the Economic Analysis of Nonstationary Time Series and the Business Cycle,” Econometrica, 57(2), 357-384.
Harris, Glen R. (1999): “Markov Chain Monte Carlo Estimation of Regime Switching Vector Autoregressions,” ASTIN Bulletin, 29(1), 47-80.
Koop, Gary (2003): “Bayesian Econometrics,” Wiley & Sons.
Krolzig, Hans-Martin (1997): “Markov-Switching Vector Autoregressions ,” Springer-Verlag.
Liu, Jun S., Wing H. Wong and Augustine Kong (1994): “Covariance Structure of the Gibbs Sampler with Applications to the Comparison of Estimators and Augmentation Schemes,” Biometrika, 81, 27-40.
McCulloch, Robert E. and Ruey S. Tsay (1994): “Statistical Analysis of Economic Time Series via Markov Switching Models,” Journal of Time Series Analysis, 15, 521-539.
Svensson, Lars E.O. (2001): “Independent Review of the Operation of Monetary Policy in New Zealand: Report to the Minister of Finance,” mimeo.
Taylor, John B. (1993): “Discretion versus Policy Rules in Practice,” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 39, 195-214.
Taylor, John B. (2000): “Reassessing Discretionary Fiscal Policy,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 21-36.
Thams, Andreas (2007): “The Relevance of the Fiscal Theory of the Price Level Revisited,” mimeo.