Chaudhry, Pradeep and Tewari, Vindhya P. (2009): Role of Public Parks/Gardens in attracting Domestic Tourists: An Example from City Beautiful from India. Published in: TOURISMOS: An International Multidisciplinary Journal of Tourism , Vol. 5, No. 1 (15. April 2010): pp. 101-109.
Download (75Kb) | Preview
Chandigarh-the ‘City Beautiful’ of India is known for its urban greenery and well planned landscaping in the whole world. More than 0.60 millions of domestic tourists are visiting Chandigarh city each year. In a research study undertaken during 2002-04, an assessment about the annual recreational use value of this city’s urban parks and gardens was made by using Zonal Travel Cost Method (TCM) on the domestic tourists coming to the city for tourism purpose. Though man made greenery can not compensate nature’s green cover, yet it plays a significant role in attracting domestic tourists towards a city of parks/gardens in a developing country like India.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Role of Public Parks/Gardens in attracting Domestic Tourists: An Example from City Beautiful from India|
|Keywords:||Domestic tourists, Parks and Gardens, Chandigarh, India|
|Subjects:||O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development
M - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting > M1 - Business Administration
L - Industrial Organization > L8 - Industry Studies: Services > L83 - Sports; Gambling; Recreation; Tourism
|Depositing User:||Evangelos Christou|
|Date Deposited:||20. Sep 2010 02:42|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 13:41|
Brown, Jr.G. & Henry, W. (1989). The economic value of elephants. The London Environmental Economics Center. London, paper 89-112.
Carreiro, M.M., Song, Y.C. & Wu, J. (2008). Ecology, Planning and Management of urban Forests: an International Perspective. New York, Springer.
Chaudhry, P. & Tewari, V.P. (2006). A comparison between TCM and CVM in assessing recreational use value of urban forestry. International Forestry Review, Vol.8, No.4, pp. 439-448
Chaudhry, P & Tewari, V.P. (2008). WTP Vs WTA for assessing recreational benefits of urban forests: a case from a modern and planned city of a developing country. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods, Vol. 18, No.3, pp.213-231.
FSI. 2005. State of Forest Report. Forest Survey of India, Dehradun.
Huang, S.L., Wong, J.H & Chen, T.C. (1998). A framework of indicator system for measuring Taipei’s urban sustainability. Landscape and Urban Planning Vol.42, pp.15-27. More, T.A., Stevens, T. & Allen, P.G. (1988). Valuation of urban parks. Landscape and urban planning, Vol.15, pp.139-152.
Navrud, S. & Mungatana, E.D. (1994). Environmental valuation in developing countries: The recreational value of wildlife viewing. Ecological Economics, Vol. 11, pp.135-151.
Schauman, S. & Salisburry, S. (1998). Restoring nature in the city: Puget Sound experiences. Landscape and urban planning, Vol.42, pp. 287-295.
SCI. (2002). Supreme Court of India order in I.A no.566 on creation of compensatory afforestation fund and charging net present value of forest land diverted for non-forest use.29/10/2002.
Technopack, K.S.A. (2003). Urge to splurge. India Today (weekly magazine), June 9, 2003.
U.S. Water Resource Council. (1983). Economics, environmental principles and guidelines for water and related land resources implementation studies. US Government Printing office, Washington, DC.