The convergence of corporate social responsibility practices

Misani, Nicola (2010): The convergence of corporate social responsibility practices. Published in: Management Research Review , Vol. 33, No. 7 (2010): pp. 734-748.

Abstract

Purpose – This paper tries to explain why many socially-responsible firms appear to converge on a standard set of corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices instead of striving to differentiate themselves from rivals and achieve competitive advantage. Design/methodology/approach – Three explanations of this convergence are presented: herd behaviour, institutional isomorphism, and strategic cooperation. The different empirical predictions of these theories are laid down. The resulting framework is used to analyse a recent self-regulatory scheme launched by the steel industry, in which knowledge-sharing was used to stimulate poor performers to curb carbon dioxide emissions. Findings – Social practices of firms are very often driven by pressures to conform, instead of pressures to perform. Even firms that want to be innovative may be forced by stakeholder requests to adopt passive and imitative behaviour. Practical implications – The paper suggests that there are two types of CSR – convergent and divergent – and that firms need to establish which type of CSR best fits their needs before they address the issues raised by stakeholders. Originality/value – The literature on CSR focuses on the relationship between stakeholders and single firms. The paper tries to add to this literature by analysing the relationship between stakeholders and industries. The paper also contributes to the debate on the financial benefits of CSR by arguing that in industries where the convergent type of CSR is dominant researchers should not expect above-average returns for socially-responsible firms.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: corporate social responsibility; strategy; institutional isomorphism; herd behaviour; cooperative behaviour; private regulation
• Subjects: M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M1 - Business Administration > M14 - Corporate Culture ; Diversity ; Social Responsibility; L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L14 - Transactional Relationships ; Contracts and Reputation ; Networks; L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L21 - Business Objectives of the Firm; L - Industrial Organization > L3 - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise > L31 - Nonprofit Institutions ; NGOs ; Social Entrepreneurship

References

Abrahamson, E. and Rosenkopf, L. (1993), “Institutional and Competitive Bandwagons: Using Mathematical Modeling as a Tool to Explore Innovation Diffusion”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 487-517.

Asia Pacific Partnership for Clean Development and Climate (2008), “The State–of-the-Art Clean Technologies (SOACT)”, available at: asiapacificpartnership.org/SteelTF.aspx (accessed 20 November 2008).

Barnett, M.L. (2007), “Stakeholder Influence Capacity and the Variability of Financial Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 794-816.

Barney, J. (1991), “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage”, Journal of Management, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 99-120.

Barreto, I. and Baden-Fuller, C. (2006), “To Conform or To Perform? Mimetic Behaviour, Legitimacy-Based Groups and Performance Consequences”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 43 No. 7, pp. 1559-1581.

Bartley, T. (2007), “Institutional Emergence in an Era of Globalization: The Rise of Transnational Private Regulation of Labor and Environmental Conditions”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 113 No. 2, pp. 297-351.

Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D. and Welch, I. (1992), “A theory of fads, fashion, custom and cultural change as informational cascades”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 100 No. 5, pp. 992-1026.

Campbell, J.L. (2007), “Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 946-967.

Carroll, A.B. (2008), “A History of Corporate Social Responsibility: Concepts and Practices”, in A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, and D.S. Siegel (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 3-15.

Commission of the European Communities (2001), “Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility”, COM(2001) 366 final, Brussels, Belgium.

Crane, A., McWilliams, A., Matten, D., Moon, J., and Siegel, D.S. (2008), “The Corporate Social Responsibility Agenda”, in A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, and D.S. Siegel (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 3-15.

Deephouse, D.L. (1996), “Does Isomorphism Legitimate?”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39 No. 4, pp. 1024-39.

DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W. (1983), “The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 48 No. 2, pp. 147-60.

Donaldson, T. and Preston, L. (1995), “The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 65-91.

Fombrun, C.J. and Shanley, M. (1990), “What’s in a name? Reputation-building and corporate strategy”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 233-258.

Freeman, R. (1984), Strategic management: A stakeholder perspective, Pitman, Boston, MA.

Hardin, G. (1968), “The Tragedy of the Commons”, Science, Vol. 162 No. 3859, pp. 1243-48.

Kantz, C. (2007), “The Power of Socialization: Engaging the Diamond Industry in the Kimberley Process”, Business and Politics, Vol. 9 No. 3, available at: www.bepress.com/bap/vol9/iss3/art2/ (accessed 20 November 2008).

King, A., Lenox, M.J. and Barnett, M.J. (2002), “Strategic Responses to the Reputation Commons Problem”, in Hoffman, A.J. and Ventresca, M.J. (Eds.), Organizations, Policy, and the Natural Environment, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, pp. 393-406.

King, A. and Lenox, M.J. (2000), “Industry Self-Regulation without Sanctions: the Chemical Industry’s Responsible Care Program”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 43 No. 4, pp. 698-716.

Knight, G. (2007), “Activism, Risk, and Communicational Politics. Nike and the Sweatshop Problem”, in S. May, G. Cheney, and J. Roper (eds.), The Debate over Corporate Social Responsibility, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 305-335.

KPMG (2008), “KPMG International survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2008”, available at: www.kpmg.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/International-corporate-responsibility-survey-2008.pdf (accessed 11 November 2008).

Margolis, J. D. and Walsh, J. P. (2003), “Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 48 No. 2, pp. 268-305.

Marquis, C., Glynn, M.A. and Davis, G.G. (2007), “Community Isomorphism and Corporate Social Action”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 925-945.

Marsh, P. (2007), “Steelmakers are to monitor carbon emissions, setting a precedent”, Financial Times, 25 October, p. 9.

Marsh, P. (2008), “Mittal fatigue”, Financial Times, 31 October, p. 9.

Matten, D. and Moon, J. (2008), “‘Implicit’ and ‘Explicit’ CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 404-424.

Melé, D. (2008), “Corporate Social Responsibility Theories”, in A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, and D.S. Siegel (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 47-82.

Meyer, J.W. and Rowan, B. (1977), “Institutional organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 83 No. 2, pp. 340-63.

Oliver C. (1991), “Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 145-179.

Olson, M. (1965), The Logic of Collective Action, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F.L. and Rynes, S.L. (2003), “Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis”, Organization Studies, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 403-441.

Park, J. (2008), “China, business and sustainability: understanding the strategic convergence”, Management Research News, Vol. 31, No. 12, pp. 951-958.

Porter, M.E. and Kramer, M.R. (2006), “Strategy & Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 84 No. 12, pp. 78-92.

Reinhardt, F.L. (1998), “Environmental Product Differentiation: Implications for Corporate Strategy”, California Management Review, Vol. 40 No. 4, pp. 5-29.

Smith, N.C. (2003), “Corporate Social Responsibility: Whether or How?”, California Management Review, Vol. 45 No. 4, pp. 52-76.

Suchman, M.C. (1995), “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 571-610.

Teerlak, A. (2007), “Order without law? The role of certified management standards in shaping socially desired firm behaviors”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 968-985.

Tempel, A. and Walgenbach, P. (2007), “Global standardization of organisational forms and management practices? When new institutionalism and the business-systems approach can learn from each other”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 44 No. 1, pp. 1-24.

Waddock S. (2008), “Building a New Institutional Infrastructure for Corporate Responsibility”, Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 87-108.

Weigelt, K. and Camerer, C. (1988), “Reputation and corporate strategy: a review of recent theory and applications”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 9 No. 5, pp. 443-454.

World Steel Association (2008a), “2008 Sustainability report of the world steel industry”, available at: www.worldsteel.org/index.php?action=storypages&id=301 (accessed 20 November 2008).

World Steel Association (2008b), “World Steel Association sets target for data collection”, available at: www.worldsteel.org/?action=newsdetail&id=252 (accessed 20 November 2008).

Zucker, L.G. (1987), “Where do institutional patterns come from? Organizations as actors in social systems”, in Zucker, L.G. (Ed.), Institutional patterns of organizations: Culture and environment, Pitman, Boston, MA, pp. 443-464.