Munich Personal RePEc Archive
Login | Create Account

Administración del conocimiento en instituciones de educación superior. Un análisis conceptual.

Ferrer, Julian and Ríos, Manriquez (2006): Administración del conocimiento en instituciones de educación superior. Un análisis conceptual. Unpublished.

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
141Kb

Abstract

Knowledge management represents a field study with a growing interest in several areas. By this, it is necesary to make a detailed analyss about possible impacts in diferent perspectives. Specially, universities must be considered as knowledge managers in its own nature, under their main functions: research, academics, continue education. This work has a main objetive to determinate the KM organizational impact in universities.

Item Type:MPRA Paper
Institution:Instituto Tecnológico de Celaya
Original Title:Administración del conocimiento en instituciones de educación superior. Un análisis conceptual.
Language:Spanish
Keywords:Knowledge management; higher education; university
Subjects:D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D83 - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief
I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Insititutions > I21 - Analysis of Education
ID Code:2622
Deposited By:Julian Ferrer
Deposited On:09. Apr 2007
Last Modified:07. Nov 2007 02:37
References:

Bixier, C.H. (2000) Creating a dynamic knowledge management maturity continuum for increased enterprise performance and innovation, Sc. D. Thesis, The George Washington University, USA. Bontis, N, Dragonetti, N.C., Jacobsen, K. and Roos, G. (1999) The Knowledge ToolBox: A Review Of The Tools Available To Measure And Manage Intangible Resources, European Management Journal, Vol. 17, No. 4, 391-402. Cheng, Y.C. (2000) A CMI Triplization Paradigm For Reformin Education In The New Millenium, The International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 156-174 Choo, C.W. (1996) The Knowing Organizations: How Organizations Use Information to Construct Meaning, Create Knowledge and Make Decisions, International Journal if Information Management, Vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 329-340. Davenport, T. H. (2001) Some Principles of Knowledge Management [Internet] Graduate School of Business, University of Teas at Austin, Available from: http://www.bus.utexas.edu/kman/kmprin.htm [Accessed 6 February 2001]. Demarest, M. (1997) Undestanding Knowledge Management, Long Range Planning, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp 374-384. Drucker, P. (1993) Post Capitalist Society, Harper Row, New York, N.Y. Gorelick, C.K. (2000) Toward an undestanding of Organizational Learning and Collaborative Technology: A Case Study of Structuration and Sensemaking in a Virtual Project Team, Ed.D. Thesis, The George Washington University, U.S.A. Gumble, H. (1988) Knowledge Management, Work Study, Vol. 47, Vol. 5 Num pp 175-177 Jager, M. (1999) The KMAT: benchmarking knowledge management, Library Management, Vol. 20, No. 7, pp. 367-372. Joia, L.A. (2000) Measuring Intangible Corporate Assets. Linking business strategy with intellectual capital, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 68-84. Jordan, J. Jones, P. (1997) Assessing your Company´s Knowledge Management Style, Long Range Planning, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 392-398. Machlup, F. (1980) Knowledge: Its Creation, Distribution and Economic Significance, Princeton University, NJ. Malhotra, Yogesh. (1996). Organizational Learning and Learning Organizations: An Overview [Internet] Knowledge Management & Organizational Learning. Available in http://www.brint.com/papers/orglrng.htm, [Consultada el 16 de febrero de 2001]. Newman, B. (1996) What Is Knowledge Management, [Internet] The Knowledge management Forum, Available from: http://www.3-cities.com/bonewman/what_is.htm, [Accessed 6 february 20001]. Nonaka, I. (1991) The Knowledge-Creating Company, Hardvard Business Review, november-december. O´Dell, C. Y Grayson, C.J. (1988) If Only We Knew what we Know. The transfer of internal knowledge and best practice. The Free Press, New York, USA. Polanyi, M. “The Tacit Dimension”. Routledge & Kegan Paul. London. 1966. Rowley, J. (2000) Knowledge Organisation for a New Millennium: Principles and Processes, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 217-223. Rowley, J. (2000) Is higher education ready for knowledge management?, The International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 14, No. 7, pp. 325-333. Rugles, R. (1988) The State of Notion: Knowledge Management in Practice, California Management Review, Spring, Vol. 40, No. 3 Seely, J. B. Duguid, P. (1995) University in the Digital Age, [Internet] Work in Progress, Available at http://www.parc.xerox.com/ops/members/brown/papers/university.html, [Accesed February 25, 2001]. Senge, P.M. (1990) The Fifth Discipline: Heart and Practice of the Learning Organization, DoubleDay, New York, N.Y. Shapiro, L. Carrillo, J. y Velásquez, C. (2000) Evolution of collaborative distance work at ITESM: Structure and and process, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 44-45. Smith, L. (2000) Knowledge discovery, capture and creation, Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp 11-12 Stevenson, J.M. (2001) The Modern University Provost, Education, Vol. 121, No. 2. Sveiby, K.E. (1997) Tacit Knowledge, [Internet] The Library, available in http://www.sveiby.com.au/Polanyi.html [consultado el 25 de febrero de 2001] Toffler, A. (1990) Powershift: Knowledge, wealth and violence at the edge of the 21st Century. Bantam Books VanEwick, O. (1998) Preparing for the Knowledge Era [Internet] HCI The Information Development Company, Available from: http://www.hci.com.au/hcisite/articles/prepare.htm, [Accessed 6 february 2001]

All papers reproduced by permission. Reproduction and distribution subject to the approval of the copyright owners.
Repository Staff Only: item control page

LMU-Logo
MPRA is a RePEc service hosted by
the Munich University Library in Germany.