Berg, Nathan (2010): Behavioral Economics. Published in: 21st Century Economics: A Reference Handbook , Vol. 2, (2010): pp. 861-872.
Download (325kB) | Preview
This article describes the emerging subfield known as behavioral economics, which borrows from psychology, empirically tests assumptions used elsewhere in economics, and provides theories that aim to be more realistic and closely tied to experimental and field data. Highlights from the experimental findings of behavioral economics are discussed. The article remarks critically on the role of empirical realism and continued use of as-if methodology in behavioral economics. Problems in normative behavioral economics are given special attention as debates arise concerning how to interpret empirical findings that contradict standard definitions of axiomatic rationality. Ecological rationality, methodological pluralism, and Simon's notion of bounded rationality are considered.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Behavioral Economics|
|Keywords:||bounded rationality, ecological rationality, Herbert Simon, as-if, survey|
|Subjects:||D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D03 - Behavioral Economics; Underlying Principles|
|Depositing User:||Nathan Berg|
|Date Deposited:||02. Dec 2010 09:59|
|Last Modified:||11. Feb 2013 20:22|
Ariely, D. (2008). Predictably irrational. NewYork: HarperCollins.
Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. (2004). Save more tomorrow: Using behavioral economics to increase employee saving. Journal of Political Economy, 112, 164–187.
Berg, N. (2003). Normative behavioral economics. Journal of Socio-Economics, 32, 411–427.
Berg, N., Eckel, C., & Johnson, C. (2009). Inconsistency pays? Time-inconsistent subjects and EU violators earn more (Working paper). Dallas: University of Texas–Dallas.
Berg, N., & Gigerenzer, G. (2007). Psychology implies paternalism? Bounded rationality may reduce the rationale to regulate risk-taking. Social Choice and Welfare, 28, 337–359.
Berg, N., & Gigerenzer, G. (In press). “As-if ” behavioral economics: Neoclassical economics in disguise?History of Economic Ideas.
Binmore, K., & Shaked, A. (2007). Experimental economics: Science or what? (ELSE Working Paper 263). London: ESRC Centre for Economic Learning and Social Evolution.
Brandstätter, E., Gigerenzer, G., & Hertwig, R. (2006). The priority heuristic: Making choices without trade-offs. Psychological Review, 113, 409–432.
Bruni, L., & Sugden, R. (2007). The road not taken: How psychology was removed from economics, and how it might be brought back. Economic Journal, 117(516), 146–173.
Camerer, C. (1999). Behavioral economics: Reunifying psychology and economics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96, 10575–10577.
Camerer, C. (2003). Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Camerer, C., & Hogarth, R. (1999). The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-laborproduction framework. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19(1–3), 7–42.
Camerer, C., & Loewenstein, G. (2004). Behavioral economics: Past, present and future. In C. Camerer, G. Loewenstein, & M. Rabin (Eds.), Advances in behavioral economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G.,&Prelec, D. (2005). Neuroeconomics: How neuroscience can inform economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 43, 9–64.
Carmon, Z., & Ariely, D. (2000). Focusing on the forgone: How value can appear so different to buyers and sellers. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(3), 360–370.
Carpenter, J., & Seki, E. (2006). Competitive work environments and social preferences: Field experimental evidence from a Japanese fishing community. Contributions to Economic Analysis & Policy Berkeley Electronic Press, 5(2), Article 2.
Charness, G., & Grosskopf, B. (2001). Relative payoffs and happiness: An experimental study. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 45, 301–328.
Dave, C., Eckel, C., Johnson, C., & Rojas, C. (2007). Eliciting risk preferences: When is simple better? (Working paper). Dallas: University of Texas–Dallas.
Eckel, C., & Grossman, P. (2002). Sex differences and statistical stereotyping in attitudes toward financial risk. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 281–295.
Eckel, C., & Grossman, P. (2008). Forecasting risk attitudes: An experimental study using actual and forecast gamble choices. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 8(1), 1–17.
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 817–868.
Friedman, M. (1953). Essays in positive economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gigerenzer, G. (2008). Rationality for mortals. NewYork: Oxford University Press.
Gigerenzer, G., & Selten, R. (2001). Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., & ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
Glimcher, P.W. (2003). Decisions, uncertainty and the brain: The science of neuroeconomics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Güth, W. (2008). (Non-) behavioral economics: A programmatic assessment. Journal of Psychology, 216, 244–253. Hammond, K. R. (1996). Human judgment and social policy: Irreducible uncertainty, inevitable error, unavoidable injustice. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hands, D. W. (2007). Economics, psychology, and the history of consumer choice theory. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract988125
Hanemann, W. M. (1991). Willingness to pay and willingness to accept: How much can they differ? American Economic Review, 81, 635–647.
Hastie, R., & Rasinski, K. A. (1988). The concept of accuracy in social judgment. In D. Bar-Tal &A.W. Kruglanski (Eds.), The social psychology of knowledge (pp. 193–208). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Heukelom, F. (2007). Kahneman and Tversky and the origin of behavioral economics (Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 07–003/1). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Tinbergen Institute.
Holt, C., & Laury, S. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review, 92, 1644–1655.
Johnson, E. J., & Goldstein, D. G. (2003). Do defaults save lives? Science, 302, 1338–1339.
Jolls, C., & Sunstein, C. R. (2006). Debiasing through law. Journal of Legal Studies, 35, 199–241.
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J., & Thaler, R. (1991). The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 193–206.
Katona, G. (1951). Psychological analysis of economic behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill. Lichtenstein, S., & Slovic, P. (1971). Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 46–55.
Loewenstein, G., & Thaler, R. (1989). Intertemporal choice. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3(4), 181–193.
Plott, C., & Zeiler, K. (2007). Exchange asymmetries incorrectly interpreted as evidence of endowment effect theory and prospect theory? American Economic Review, 97, 1449–1466.
Rabin, M. (1998). Psychology and economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 11–46.
Shang, J., & Croson, R. (2009). Field experiments in charitable contribution: The impact of social influence on the voluntary provision of public goods. Economic Journal, 119, 1–17.
Shiller, R. (2000). Irrational exuberance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Shogren, J. F., Shin, S.Y., Hayes, D. J., & Kliebenstein, J. B. (1994). Resolving differences in willingness to pay and willingness to accept. American Economic Review, 84(1), 255–270.
Simon, H. (1986). Rationality in psychology and economics. Journal of Business, 59, S209–S224.
Slutsky, E. E. (1952). Sulla Teoria del Bilancio del Consonatore. In G. J. Stigler & K. E. Boulding (Eds.), Readings in price theory (pp. 27–56). Homewood, IL: Irwin. (Original work published 1915)
Starmer, C. (2004). Friedman’s risky methodology (Working paper). Nottingham, UK: University of Nottingham.
Starmer, C. (2005). Normative notions in descriptive dialogues. Journal of Economic Methodology, 12, 277–289.
Surowiecki, J. (2009, January 26). A smarter stimulus. The New Yorker. Available at http://www.newyorker.com
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2003). Libertarian paternalism. American Economic Review, 93, 175–179.
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Thaler, R., & Tversky,A. (1990). Preference reversals. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4(2), 201–211.
Veblen, T. (1994). The theory of the leisure class. New York: Dover. (Original work published 1899)
Wansink, B. (2006). Mindless eating: Why we eat more than we think. New York: Bantam.