Abdul Karim, Zulkefly and Jusoh, Mansor and Khalid, Norlin (2008): Halaju wang di Malaysia : bukti empirik. Published in: International Journal of Management Studies (IJMS) , Vol. 17, No. 1 (June 2010): 149--170.
Download (277Kb) | Preview
This paper aims to examine the volatility of money velocity and also to estimate the velocity of money function in Malaysia by using the quarterly time series data. This study employed the recent econometric techniques such as volatility model in ARCH and GARCH framework, Johansen co integration test and Vector Error Correction Model (VECM). The results show that the velocity of money for M1 (V1) and M2 (V2) are volatile and persistence rather than M3 (V3). The Johansen co integration test result indicates that the existence of long run relationship between velocity of money V1, V2 and V3 on the dependent variables, such as bond interest rate, deposit rate and income. Furthermore, the VECM result showed that the changes in dependent variables such as bond interest rate, deposit rate and income are significantly to influence the changes in velocity of money for V2 and V3 in the long run. Conversely, in the short run, a change in the national income has only significantly to cause the changes in the velocity of money V2 and V3, while the interest rate has significant effect to cause the velocity of money V3.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Halaju wang di Malaysia : bukti empirik|
|English Title:||The velocity of money in Malaysia : empirical evidence|
|Keywords:||Velocity of money, volatility, time series techniques|
|Subjects:||C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables > C32 - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models
E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E51 - Money Supply; Credit; Money Multipliers
E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates > E40 - General
|Depositing User:||Zulkefly Abdul Karim|
|Date Deposited:||25. Nov 2010 04:11|
|Last Modified:||14. Feb 2013 10:19|
Akaike, H. (1977). On entropy maximasitation principle. In. P.R. Krishniah (eds.). Application of Statistics. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
Azali, M. (1996). Velocity and the variability of anticipated and unanticipated money growth in Malaysia. Applied Economics Letters, 3, 697-700.
Bordo, M. D., & Jonung, L. (1981). The long-run behaviour of the income velocity of money in five advanced countries: An institutional approach. Economic Inquiry, 19, 96-116.
Bordo, M. D., & Jonung, L. (1987). The long-run behaviour of the velocity of circulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cagan, P. (1982). The choice among monetary aggregates as target and guides for monetary policy. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 14(4), 661-686.
Dickey, D. A. and Fuller, W. A. (1981), Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica, 49, 1057-1071. Engle, R. F., & Granger. C. W. J. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55, 251–276.
Fisher, I. 1930. The theory of interest. New York: MacMillan.
Friedman, M. (1983). Monetary variability: The United States and Japan. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 15, 339-343.
Friedman, M. (1984). Lesson from the 1979-1982 monetary policy experiment. American Economic Review, 74, 397-400.
Gonzalo, J. (1994). Five alternative methods of estimating long-run equilibrium relationships. Journal of Econometrics, 60, 203-233. Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometrics models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 55, 251-276.
Granger, C. W. J. (1988). Some recent development in a concept of causality. Journal of Econometrics, 39, 199-211. Granger, C.W.J., & Newbold, P. (1974). Spurious regressions in econometrics. Journal of Econometrics, 2, 111-120.
Hall, T.E., & Noble, N. R. (1987). Velocity and the variability of money growth: evidence from granger causality tests. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 19, 112-116.
Johansen, S. & Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inferences on cointegration with application to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52, 169-210
Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamic Control, 12, 231-254.
Lucas, Jr. R.E. (1988). Money demand in the United States : A quantitative review. In: Brunner, K., Meltzer, A.H (Eds.), Money, Cycles and Exchange Rates: Essays in honor of Allan H. Meltzer, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series, vol. 29. North-Holland, Amsterdam: 137-168.
McGrattan, E.R. (1998). Trends in velocity and policy expectations : a comment. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, vol (49), 305-316.
Mehra, Y. P. (1989). Velocity and the variability of money growth: Evidence from granger-causality tests. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 21(2), 262 – 266.
Osterwald-Lenum, M. (1992). A note with quantiles of the asymptotic distributrion of the maximum likelihood cointegration rank test statistics. Oxford Buletin of Economics and Statistics, 54, 461-471.
Serletis, A. & Shahmoradi, A. (2005). Velocity and the variability of money growth: evidence from a VARMA, GARCH-M model. Discussion Paper 2005-18, Department of Economics, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Setapa, A. (1991). The conduct and the effectiveness of monetary policy in Malaysia. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Exeter.
Toda, H. Y., & Phillips, P. C. B. (1993). Vectors auto regressions and causality. Econometrica, 1367–1393.