Ale Ebrahim, Nader and Ahmed, Shamsuddin and Taha, Zahari (2008): Concurrent Collaboration in Research and Development. Published in: proceeding of National Conference on Design and Concurrent Engineering (DECON) 2008, Melaka, Malaysia. (28. October 2008): pp. 1-4.
Download (49kB) | Preview
Integration is the essence of current research and development (R&D) activity in many organizations. Integration can be established in various ways depending on the type, size and intricacy in organizational functions and products. Nevertheless, research and development (R&D) has become an inevitable function in most manufacturing companies in order to develop their own product niches for their survival in the prevailing highly completive market environment. Research and development functions are fundamental drivers of value creation in technologybased enterprises. Of creating and maintaining a vibrant R&D environment, organizations individually or collectively need to incorporate virtual R&D team. A virtual R&D team can introduce new product in less lead time than by conventional R&D working. Therefore, how to increase the possibility of having more successful R&D is a critical issue for enterprises. This paper examines the current approach of collaboration in R&D issues from the perspective of their impact on virtual R&D team in enterprises and compares the findings with the other concepts of concurrent collaboration. By reviewing literature and theories, the paper firstly presents the definition and characteristics of virtual R&D teams. A comparison of different types of virtual R&D teams along with the strengths and limitations of the preceding studies in this area are also presented. It is observed that most of the research activities encourage and support virtual R&D teams applicable to enterprises. Distinctive benefits of establishing virtual R&D team have been enumerated and demand future attention has been indicated in the paper.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Concurrent Collaboration in Research and Development|
|English Title:||Concurrent Collaboration in Research and Development|
|Keywords:||Research and Development; Virtual team; Concurrent Collaboration;|
|Subjects:||L - Industrial Organization > L6 - Industry Studies: Manufacturing
O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Technological Change; Research and Development; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance
O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development
M - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting > M1 - Business Administration > M11 - Production Management
M - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting > M1 - Business Administration
P - Economic Systems > P2 - Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies > P23 - Factor and Product Markets; Industry Studies; Population
P - Economic Systems > P4 - Other Economic Systems
O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Technological Change; Research and Development; Intellectual Property Rights
|Depositing User:||Nader Ale Ebrahim|
|Date Deposited:||30. Nov 2010 09:21|
|Last Modified:||20. Feb 2013 21:36|
Rezgui, Y., Exploring virtual team-working effectiveness in the construction sector. Interacting with Computers, 2007. 19: p. 96–112.
Acs, Z.J. and L. Preston, Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises, Technology, and Globalization: Introduction to a Special Issue on Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in the Global Economy. Small Business Economics, 1997. 9: p. 1-6.
Li, J. and D.R. Yue, Managing Global Research and Development in China: Patterns of R&D Configuration and Evolution. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2005. 17(3): p. 317–337.
Hertel, G.T., S. Geister, and U. Konradt, Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research. Human Resource Management Review, 2005. 15: p. 69–95.
Kafouros, M.I., et al., The role of internationalization in explaining innovation performance. Technovation, 2008. 28: p. 63–74.
Munkvold, B.E. and I. Zigurs, Process and technology challenges in swift-starting virtual teams. Information & Management, 2007. 44: p. 287–299.
Hegde, D. and D. Hicks, The maturation of global corporate R&D: Evidence from the activity of U.S. foreign subsidiaries. Research Policy, 2008. 37: p. 90–406.
Walvoord, A.A.G., et al., Empowering followers in virtual teams: Guiding principles from theory and practice”, Computers in Human Behavior (article in press). 2008.
Kratzer, J., R.T.A.J. Leenders, and J.M.L.V. Engelen, Managing creative team performance in virtual environments: an empirical study in 44 R&D teams. Technovation, 2006. 26: p. 42–49.
Criscuolo, P., On the road again: Researcher mobility inside the R&D network. Research Policy, 2005. 34: p. 1350–1365
Bochenek, G. and J. Ragusa, Improving Integrated Project Team Interaction Through Virtual (3D) Collaboration. Engineering Management Journal, 2004. 16(2): p. 3.
Gassmann, O. and M. Von Zedtwitz, Trends and determinants of managing virtual R&D teams. R&D Management 2003. 33(3): p. 243-262.
Chen, H.H., et al., Developing new products with knowledge management methods and process development management in a network. Computers in Industry, 2008b. 59: p. 242–253.
Chen, M., et al., Team Spirit: Design, implementation, and evaluation of a Web-based group decision support system. Decision Support Systems, 2007. 43: p. 1186–1202.
Cascio, W.F. and S. Shurygailo, E-Leadership and Virtual Teams. Organizational Dynamics, 2003. 31(4): p. 362-376.
Anderson, A.H., et al., Virtual team meetings: An analysis of communication and context. Computers in Human Behavior, 2007. 23: p. 2558–2580.
Leenders, R.T.A.J., J.M.L.V. Engelen, and J. Kratzer, Virtuality, communication, and new product team creativity: a social network perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 2003. 20: p. 69–92.
Powell, A., G. Piccoli, and B. Ives, Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions for future research. The Data base for Advances in Information Systems, 2004. 35(1): p. 6–36.
Rice, D.J., et al., Improving the Effectiveness of Virtual Teams by Adapting Team Processes. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2007. 16: p. 567–594.
Sorli, M., et al., Managing product/process knowledge in the concurrent/simultaneous enterprise environment. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2006. 22: p. 399–408.
Sanchez, A.M., M.P. Perez, and P.D.L. Carnicer, Teleworking and new product development. European Journal of Innovation Management, 2006. 9(2): p. 202-214.
Rosen, B., S. Furst, and R. Blackburn, Overcoming Barriers to Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Teams. Organizational Dynamics, 2007. 36(3): p. 259–273.
May, A. and C. Carter, A case study of virtual team working in the European automotive industry. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2001. 27: p. 171-186.
Bergiel, J.B., E.B. Bergiel, and P.W. Balsmeier, Nature of virtual teams: a summary of their advantages and disadvantages. Management Research News, 2008. 31(2): p. 99-110.
Lee-Kelley, L. and T. Sankey, Global virtual teams for value creation and project success: A case study. International Journal of Project Management 2008. 26: p. 51–62.
Gassmann, O. and M. Von Zedtwitz, Innovation Processes in Transnational Corporations. International Handbook of Innovation, ed. L.V. Shavinina. 2003: Elsevier Science Ltd.
Kratzer, J., R. Leenders, and J.V. Engelen, Keeping Virtual R&D Teams Creative. Industrial Research Institute, Inc., 2005. March-April: p. 13-16.
Naveh, E., The effect of integrated product development on efficiency and innovation. International Journal of Production Research, 2005. 43(13): p. 2789–2808.
Yip, G. and A. Dempster, Using the Internet to Enhance Global Strategy. European Management Journal, 2005. 23(1): p. 1–13.
Arranz, N. and J.C.F.D. Arroyabe, The choice of partners in R&D cooperation: An empirical analysis of Spanish firms. Technovation, 2008. 28: p. 88–100.
Cummings, J.L. and B.S. Teng, Transferring R&D knowledge: the key factors affecting knowledge transfer success. Journal of Engineering Technology Management, 2003(20): p. 39–68.