An appraisal of the wealth effect in the US: evidence from pseudo-panel data

Salotti, Simone (2010): An appraisal of the wealth effect in the US: evidence from pseudo-panel data.

Abstract

How does household wealth influence consumption? The empirical evidence brought so far by the literature is unclear, mostly because of the low quality of the data more readily available: aggregate data, cross sections and panel datasets lacking important variables all present major shortcomings for a proper analysis of the wealth effect. The aim of our paper is to contribute to the appraisal of the wealth effect performing a pseudo-panel analysis for the USA (1989-2007), combining information from the Consumer Expenditure Survey and the Survey of Consumer Finances. We distinguish between total and non durables consumption, and we also investigate the roles of the different components of household wealth, both gross and net. Our estimates indicate that there is a significant tangible wealth effect (between 2 and 4 cents per dollar), with an overwhelming importance of the value of the house of residence. On the contrary, financial wealth seems to positively affect consumption of the older households only. In general, it seems that older households experience higher wealth effects, i.e., extract more liquidity from their assets, than younger ones, which rely more on income effects.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Consumption; household wealth; wealth effect; pseudo-panel.
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D12 - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E21 - Consumption ; Saving ; Wealth

References

Ando, A., and F. Modigliani. 1963. The “life cycle” hypothesis of saving: aggregate implications and tests. The American Economic Review 53(1): 55-84.

Attanasio, O., and J. Banks. 2001. The assessment: household saving - issues in theory and policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 17(1): 1-19.

Belski, E., and J. Prakken. 2004. Housing wealth effects: housing’s impact on wealth accumulation, wealth distribution and consumer spending. Harvard University, Joint Center for Housing Studies, W04-13, 2004.

Benjamin, J.D., P. Chinloy, and G.D. Jud. 2004. Real estate versus financial wealth in consumption. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 29(3): 341-354.

Bernanke, B. 2005. The global saving glut and the U.S. current account deficit, Remarks at the Sandridge Lecture. Virginia Association of Economics, Richmond, Virginia, Federal Reserve Board.

Bertaut, C.C. 2002. Equity prices, household wealth, and consumption growth in foreign industrial countries: wealth effects in the 1990s. International Finance Discussion Papers 724, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

Bostic, R., S. Gabriel, and G. Painter. 2009. Housing wealth, financial wealth, and consumption: new evidence from micro data. Regional Science and Urban Economics 39: 79-89.

Browning, M.J., A.S. Deaton, and M. Irish. 1985. A profitable approach to labor supply and commodity demands over the life-cycle. Econometrica 53: 503-544.

Campbell, J.Y., and J.F. Cocco. 2006. How do house prices affect consumption? Evidence from micro data. Journal of Monetary Economics 54: 591-621.

Carroll, C., M. Otsuka, and J. Slacalek. 2006. How large is the houseing wealth effect? A new approach. NBER Working Paper 12476.

Case, K., and J. Quigley. 2008. How housing booms unwind: income effects, wealth effects, and feedbacks through financial markets. Journal of Housing Policy 8(2): 161-180.

Case, K., J. Quigley, and R. Shiller. 2005. Comparing wealth effects: the stock market versus the housing market. Advances in Macroeconomics, Vol. 5(1): Article 1.

Catte, P., N. Girouard, R. Price, and C. André. 2004. Housing markets, wealth and the business cycle, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 394.

Cynamon, B., and S. Fazzari. 2008. Household debt in the consumer age: source of growth—risk of collapse. Capitalism and Society 3(2): Article 3.

Davis, M., and M. Palumbo. 2001. A primer on the economics and time series econometrics of wealth effects. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Finance and Economics Discussion Paper Series No. 2001-09, Washington, DC.

Deaton, A. 1985. Panel data from times series of cross-sections. Journal of Econometrics 30: 109–126.

Del Boca, D., M. Locatelli, and D. Vuri. 2005. Child care choices of Italian households. Review of the Economics of the Household 3: 453-477.

D'Orazio, M., M. Di Zio, and M. Scanu. 2006. Statistical matching: theory and practice. Chichester, England: Wiley.

Disney, R., A. Henley, and D. Jevons. 2002. House price shocks, negative equity and household consumption in the UK in the 1990s. Mimeo.

Dvornak, N., and M. Kohler. 2007. Housing wealth, stock market wealth and consumption: a panel analysis for Australia. Economic Record 83(261): 117-130.

Dynan, K., and D. Maki. 2001. Does stock market wealth matter for consumption? Finance and Economics Discussion Series, No. 2001.23, Washington: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

Edison, H., and T. Sløk. 2002. Stock market wealth effects and the new economy: a cross-country study. International Finance 5(1): 1-22.

Engelhardt, G.V. 1996. Consumption, down payments, and liquidity constraints. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 28(2): 255-271.

Fernandez-Villaverde, J., and D. Krueger. 2007. Consumption over the life-cycle: facts from Consumer Expenditure Survey. The Review of Economics and Statistics 89(3): 552-565.

Fienberg, S.E., and W.M. Mason. 1985. Specification and implementation of age, period, and cohort models. In W.M. Mason & S.E. Fienberg (Eds.), Cohort analysis in social research: Beyond the identification problem. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Garner, T., G. Janini, W. Passero, L. Paszkiewicz, and M. Vendemia. 2006. The CE and the PCE: a comparison. Monthly Labor Review September: 20-46.

Girouard, N., and S. Blöndal. 2001. House prices and economic activity. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 279.

Greenspan, A. 2003. Remarks at the annual convention of the Independent Community Bankers of America, Orlando, Florida,” March 4th.

Hüfner, F., and I. Koske. 2010. Explaining household saving rates in G7 countries: implications for Germany. OECD Economics Department Working papers no. 754.

Juster, T., J. Lupton, J. Smith, and F. Stafford. 2005. The decline in household saving and the wealth effect. The Review of Economics and Statistics 87(4): 20-27.

Kennickell, A. 1988. Multiple imputation in the Survey of Consumer Finances. http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/oss/oss2/method.html.

Lehnert, A. 2003. Housing, consumption and credit constraints. Federal Reserve Board Working Paper.

Lettau, M., and S. Ludvigson. 2004. Understanding trend and cycle in asset values: reevaluating the wealth effect on consumption. The American Economic Review 94(1): 279-299.

Levin, L. 1998. Are assets fungible? Testing the behavioral theory of life-cycle savings. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 36: 59-83.

Liu, X., and C. Shu. 2004. Consumption and stock markets in Asian economies. International Review of Applied Economics 18(4): 483-496.

Ludvigson, S., and C. Steindel. 1999. How important is the stock market effect on consumption? Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review, July.

Ludwig, A., and T. Sløk. 2002. The impact of stock prices and house prices on consumption in OECD countries. IMF working paper, no. 01.

Maki, D.M., and M.G. Palumbo. 2001. Disentangling the wealth effect: a cohort analysis of household saving in the 1990s. Finance and Economics Discussion Series, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

Mehra, Y.P. 2001. The wealth effect in empirical life-cycle aggregate consumption equations. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Quarterly, Vol. 87/2.

Miniaci, R., C. Monfardini, and G. Weber. 2010. How does consumption change upon retirement? Empirical Economics 38: 257-280.

Montalto, C., and J. Sung. 1996. Multiple imputation in the 1992 Survey of Consumer Finances. Financial Counseling and Planning 7.

Morris, E.D. 2006. Examining the wealth effect from home price appreciation. University of Michigan, mimeo.

Paiella, M. 2007a. The stock market, housing and consumer spending: a survey of the evidence on wealth effect. Bank of Italy conference: Household Wealth in Italy, Perugia, October.

Paiella, M. 2007b. Does wealth affect consumption? Evidence for Italy. Journal of Macroeconomics 29: 189-205. Parker, J.A. 1999. Spendthrift in America? On two decades of decline in the US saving rate. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 14: 317-370.

Petersen, M.A. 2009. Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Review of Financial Studies 22(1): 435-480.

Poterba, J.M. 2000. Stock market wealth and consumption. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 14(2): 99-118.

Ridder, G., and R. Moffitt. 2007. The econometrics of data combination. Handbook of Econometrics 6: 5469-5547.

Rosati, N. 1998. Matching statistico tra dati ISTAT sui consumi e dati Bankitalia sui redditi per il 1995. Padova Economics Department Discussion Paper, Vol. 7.

Rubin, D.B. 1987. Estimation of imputation uncertainty. In: R.J.A. Little and D.B. Rubin, Statistical analysis with missing data. Wiley-Interscience.

Russell, J.E. and J.W. Fraas. 2005. An application of panel regression to pseudo panel data. Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints 31(1): 1-15.

Ryder, N.B. 1965. The cohort as a concept in the study of social change. American Sociological Review 30: 843-861.

Shirvani, H., and B. Wilbratte. 2000. Does consumption respond more strongly to stock market declines than to increases? International Economic Journal 14(3): 41-49.

Skinner, J.S. 1996. Is housing wealth a sideshow? In Advances in the Economics of Aging, University of Chicago Press.

Sousa, R.M. 2003. Property of stocks and wealth effects on consumption. NIPE – University of Minho working paper.

Tuttle, M.H., and J. Gauger. 2003. Wealth effects and consumption: a multivariate evaluation. Mimeo.