Freille, Sebastian and Haque, Mohammad Emranul and Kneller, Richard Anthony (2007): Federalism, decentralisation and corruption.
Download (798kB) | Preview
We investigate the empirical relationship between decentralisation and corruption. Using a newly assembled dataset containing data for up to 174 countries, we revisit the empirical evidence and seek to explain some of the inconsistent results that exist in the literature. We find that not only results differ due to the use of different specifications and data but more importantly because previous research overlooks the relationship between different dimensions of decentralisation. We propose an approach aimed at exploring the aggregate effect of decentralization on corruption. In this context, we analyze the existence of direct and indirect effects of these aspects on corruption. Our results suggest that fiscal (market) decentralisation is associated with lower corruption. However, we also find that constitutional decentralisation (federalism) is associated with higher corruption. Furthermore, we find that certain forms of political decentralisation worsen the positive effect of constitutional centralization on corruption. Finally, other forms of decentralisation such as spatial decentralisation do not appear to have a strong association with corruption. Our results suggest the possibility that previous empirical work may grossly overestimate de aggregate impact of decentralization and corruption.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Federalism, decentralisation and corruption|
|Keywords:||Fiscal decentralisation; Corruption; Federalism; Unitarism; Political Institutions|
|Subjects:||H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations > H70 - General
H - Public Economics > H1 - Structure and Scope of Government > H10 - General
H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H40 - General
O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O10 - General
|Depositing User:||Sebastian Freille|
|Date Deposited:||21. Dec 2010 13:16|
|Last Modified:||14. Feb 2013 17:40|
Ames, B. (1994). The reverse coattails effect: Local party organization in the 1989 brazilian presidential election. American Political Science Review.
Aranson, P. H. (1990). Federalism: The reasons for rules. Cato Journal, 10(1):17– 38.
Bardhan, P. and Mookherjee, D. (2000). Capture and governance at local and national levels. American Economic Review, 90(2):135–139.
Barenstein, M. and de Mello, L. (2001). Fiscal decentralization and governance: 30 A cross-country analysis. IMF Working Papers 01/71, International Monetary Fund.
Bermeo, N. (2002). A new look at federalism: The import of institutions. Journal of Democracy, 13(2):96–110.
Brunetti, A. and Weder, B. (2003). A free press is bad news for corruption. Journal of Public Economics, 87:1801–1824.
Chowdhury, S. K. (2004). The effect of democracy and press freedom on corrup- tion: an empirical test. Economics Letters, 85(1):93–101.
Ebel, R. D. and Yilmaz, S. (2002). On the measurement and impact of fiscal decentralization. Policy Research Working Paper Series 2809, The World Bank.
Elazar, D. (1995). From statism to federalism: A paradigm shift. Publius, 25(2):5– 18.
Enikolopov, R. and Zhuravskaya, E. (2007). Decentralization and political insti- tutions. Journal of Public Economics.
Fisman, R. and Gatti, R. (2002). Decentralization and corruption: evidence across countries. Journal of Public Economics, 83:325–345.
Fjelstad, O.-H. (2004). Decentralisation and corruption: A review. CMI Working Paper 10, Bergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute.
Freille, S., Haque, E., and Kneller, R. (forthcoming). A contribution to the em- pirics of press freedom and corruption. European Journal of Political Economy.
Gelineau, F. and Remmer, K. L. (2006). Political decentralization and electoral accountability: The argentine experience, 1983-2001. British Journal of Political Science.
Gerring, J., Moreno, C., and Thacker, S. C. (2005a). Are unitary systems better than federal systems? Unpublished manuscript.
Gerring, J., Moreno, C., and Thacker, S. C. (2005b). Centripetal democratic governance: A theory and global inquiry. American Political Science Review, 99(4):567–581. 31
Goldsmith, A. A. (1999). Slapping the grasping hand: Correlates of political corruptionin emerging markets. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 58(3):866–883.
Huther, J. and Shah, A. (1998). Applying a simple measure of good governance to the debate on fiscal decentralization. Policy Research Working Paper Series 1894, The World Bank.
Kuncoro, A. (2004). Bribery in indonesia: Some evidence from micro-level data. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 40(3):329–354.
La Porta, R., Lopez-de Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. (1999). The quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 15(1):222–79.
Oates, W. (2005). Toward a second-generation theory of fiscal federalism. Inter- national Tax and Public Finance, 12(4):349–373.
Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Persson, T., Tabellini, G., and Trebbi, F. (2003). Electoral rules and corruption. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4):958–989.
Riker, W. (1964). Federalism: Origins, operation, significance. Little, Brown and Co., Boston, MA.
Rodden, J. (2002). The dilemma of fiscal federalism: Grants and fiscal performance around the world. American Journal of Political Science, 46(3):670–687.
Rondinelli, D. A. (2006). International Development Governance, chapter Decen- tralization and development. CRC Press.
Samuels, D. (2000). The gubernatorial coattails effect: Federalism and congres- sional elections in brazil. Journal of Politics.
Schneider, A. (2003). Decentralization: Conceptualization and measurement. Studies in Comparative International Development, 38(3):32–56.
Serra, D. (2006). Empirical determinants of corruption: A sensitivity analysis. Public Choice, 126(1):225–256.
Tiebout, C. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5):416–424. 32
Treisman, D. (2000). The causes of corruption: A cross-national study. Journal of Public Economics, 76(3):399–457.
Treisman, D. (2002a). Decentralization and the quality of government. Unpub- lished manuscript.
Treisman, D. (2002b). Defining and measuring decentralization: A global perspec- tive. Unpublished manuscript.
Wade, R. (1997). How infrastructure agencies motivate staff: Canal irrigation in india and the republic of korea. In Mody, A., editor, Infrastructure Strategies in East Asia. World Bank.
Wu, X. (2005). Corporate governance and corruption. Governance: An Interna- tional Journal of Policy, 18(2):151–170.