Popov, Vladimir (2010): To devalue or not to devalue? How East European countries responded to the outflow of capital in 1997-99 and in 2008-09.
Download (691kB) | Preview
If there is a negative terms of trade or financial shock leading to the deterioration in the balance of payments, there are two basic options for a country that has limited foreign exchange reserves. First, a country can maintain a fixed exchange rate (or even a currency board) and wait until the reduction of foreign exchange reserves leads to the reduction of money supply: this will drive domestic prices down and stimulate exports, raise interest rates and stimulate the inflow of capital, and finally will correct the balance of payments. Second, the country can allow the devaluation of national currency – flexible exchange rate will automatically bring the balance of payments back into the equilibrium. Because national prices are less flexible than exchange rates, the first type of adjustment is associated with the greater reduction of output. The empirical evidence on East European countries and other transition economies for 1998-99 period (outflow of capital after the 1997 Asian and 1998 Russian currency crises and slowdown of output growth rates) suggests that the second type of policy response (devaluation) was associated with smaller loss of output than the first type (monetary contraction). 2008-09 developments provide additional evidence for this hypothesis.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||To devalue or not to devalue? How East European countries responded to the outflow of capital in 1997-99 and in 2008-09|
|Keywords:||Devaluation, capital account shocks, fixed and flexible exchange rates, macroeconomic response to shocks|
|Subjects:||F - International Economics > F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance > F42 - International Policy Coordination and Transmission
F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance > F32 - Current Account Adjustment; Short-Term Capital Movements
F - International Economics > F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance > F41 - Open Economy Macroeconomics
F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance > F31 - Foreign Exchange
F - International Economics > F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance > F43 - Economic Growth of Open Economies
|Depositing User:||Vladimir Popov|
|Date Deposited:||13. Jan 2011 23:03|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 10:40|
Aghion, Ph., G-M. Angeletos, A. Banerjee, K. Manova (2004). Volatility and Growth: Financial Development and the Cyclical Composition of Investment.
Aslund, A. (2008). Why Latvia Should Not Devalue. – Dec. 9, 2008 (http://www.petersoninstitute.org/realtime/?p=311
Bruno, Michael, and Easterly, William (1995), Inflation Crisis and Long-Run Growth. Unpublished. World Bank.
Bruno, Michael (1995), Does Inflation Really Lower Growth? - Finance & Development, September 1995.
Edwards, Sebastian and Igal Magendzo (2003). A CURRENCY OF ONE’S OWN? AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION ON DOLLARIZATION AND INDEPENDENT CURRENCY UNIONS. NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES Working Paper 9514 (http://www.nber.org/papers/w9514).
Eichengreen, B. (2001). “What Problems Can Dollarization Solve?”, Journal of Policy Modeling 23(3), 267-77.
Barry Eichengreen and Jeffrey Sachs (1985), “Exchange Rates and Economic Recovery in the 1930s,” Journal of Economic History 45, 925-946.
EBRD (2010). Transition Report 2010. EBRD, London.
Eichengreen, B. and R. Haussmann (1999). “Exchange Rates and Financial Fragility”, paper presented at the IDB-OECD forum.
Eichengreen, Barry and Douglas Irwin (2009). The protectionist temptation: Lessons from the Great Depression for today – Ecomonitor, Mar 19, 2009 (http://www.rgemonitor.com/globalmacro-monitor/256063/the_protectionist_temptation_lessons_from_the_great_depression_for_today
Fanelli, J. (2005). International Financial Architecture, Macro Volatility, and Institutions. Background paper for the project. 2004.
Frankel, Jeffrey (2008). The Estimated Effects of the Euro on Trade: Why Are They Below Historical Effects of Monetary Unions Among Smaller Countries?, NBER Working Papers 14542.
Glick, Reuven and Andrew Rose (2002) “Does a Currency Union Affect Trade? The Time Series Evidence”, European Economic Review 46-6, 1125-1151.
Hanke, Steve H., Lars Jonung, and Kurt Schuler, Russian Currency and Finance: A Currency Board Approach to Reform. London: Routledge, 1993, 222 pages.
Hanke, Steve H. (2003). The Argentine Straw Man: A Response to Currency Board Critics. - The Cato Journal, Vol. 23, 2003.
Hanke, Steve H. (2002): On Dollarization and Currency Boards: Error and Deception, Journal of Policy Reform Vol. 5 no. 4, pp203-222.
Johnson, S. (2008). Too Small to Fail. – Europe EconoMonitor, Dec. 26, 2008 (http://www.rgemonitor.com/euro-monitor/254870/too_small_to_fail).
Kamhi, Nadja and Vivek H. Dehejia. An Assessment of the Currency Board Regime in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Carleton Economic Papers 05-01. Second Draft: February 6, 2005 http://www.carleton.ca/economics/cep/cep05-01.pdf
Krugman, P. (2003). Argentina: The Role of Ideology. Typescript, 2003 http://www.pkarchive.org/crises/ArgentinaRoleofIdeology.html
Krugman, P. (2008). “Latvia is the new Argentina (slightly wonkish)”. NYT, December 23, 2008, http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/12/23/latvia-is-the-new-argentina-slightly-wonkish/
Marx, K. 18th Brumaire of Louis Bonapatre, Chapter 1.
Montes M., V. Popov (1999). The Asian Crisis Turns Global. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore, 1999.
Peresetsky, A., V. Popov (2008). Russia. - In: Macroeconomic Volatility, Institutions and Financial Architecture Ed. by J. M. Fanelli, Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
Polterovich, V., V. Popov (2004). Accumulation of Foreign Exchange Reserves and Long Term Economic Growth. – In: Slavic Eurasia’s Integration into the World Economy. Ed. By S. Tabata and A. Iwashita. Slavic Research Center, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 2004.
Polterovich, V. (2006). Lowering Inflation Should Not Be the Main Task of the Government. In Russian. <СНИЖЕНИЕ ИНФЛЯЦИИ НЕ ДОЛЖНО БЫТЬ ГЛАВНОЙ ЦЕЛЬЮ ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКОЙ ПОЛИТИКИ ПРАВИТЕЛЬСТВА РОССИИ. Записка в Правительство РФ, 2 апреля 2006 г.> (http://www.cemi.rssi.ru/rus/publicat/e-pubs/polterov/2006-1.pdf).
Rose, A. K. (2000). “One Money, One Market: Estimating the Effect of Common Currencies on Trade”, Economic Policy 15(30), 7-46.
Rose, A.K. and C. Engel (2002). “Currency Unions and International Integration”, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 34(4).
Rose, A.K. and E. van-Wincoop (2001). “National Money as a Barrier to International Trade: The Real Case for Currency Union”, American Economic Review; 91(2).
Roubini, Nouriel (1998). The Case Against Currency Boards: Debunking 10 Myths about the Benefits of Currency Boards. Stern School of Business, New York University, February 1998.
Schuler, Kurt (2005). Ignorance and Influence: U.S. Economists on Argentina’s Depression of 1998-2002. - Econ Journal Watch, Volume 2, Number 2, August 2005, pp 234-278.
Schuler, Kurt (2008). Sites on currency boards and dollarization maintained by K. Schuller: http://users.erols.com/kurrency/ ; http://www.dollarization.org/ http://www.econjournalwatch.org/pdf/SchulerIntellectualTyrannyAugust2005.pdf
Stiglitz, Joseph (1998). More Instruments and Broader Goals: Moving Toward the Post-Washington Consensus. WIDER Annual Lecture. WIDER/UNU.