Mostafavi, Moeen and Shakouri G., Hamed and Fatehi, Ali-Reza (2010): Why the determinacy condition is a weak criterion in rational expectations models. Published in: Proceeding of 2010 International Conference on Information and Finance ( ICIF 2010) (26. November 2010): pp. 208-212.
Download (129kB) | Preview
This paper disputes what Blanchard and Kahn have reported as the solution of linear rational expectation(RE) systems many years ago. Their method leads to traditional determinacy condition which is used very much nowadays. In this paper we have a new look to the mathematical procedure of this solution method and the main problem in their solution will be shown. We introduce a new methodology for modeling the systems with expectation, while in future this way of modeling can be used to replace traditional RE models.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Why the determinacy condition is a weak criterion in rational expectations models|
|Keywords:||Rational expectation; Determinacy condition; Stability; Uniqueness; Predictive control|
|Subjects:||C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C53 - Forecasting and Prediction Methods; Simulation Methods
D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D84 - Expectations; Speculations
E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E52 - Monetary Policy
H - Public Economics > H3 - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents > H30 - General
|Depositing User:||Moeen Mostafavi|
|Date Deposited:||24. Jan 2011 08:33|
|Last Modified:||15. Feb 2013 22:48|
Blanchard, O. and C. Kahn, The solution of linear difference models under rational expectations. Econometrica, 1980. 48(5): p. 1305-1311.
Uhlig, H., A toolkit for analyzing nonlinear dynamic stochastic models easily. Computational methods for the study of dynamic economies, 1999:p. 30–61.
Evans, G. and S. Honkapohja, Learning and Macroeconomics. 2008.
Bullard, J. and K. Mitra, Determinacy, learnability, and monetary policy inertia. Journal of money credit and banking, 2007. 39(5): p. 1177.
Tetlow, R. and P. Von zur Muehlen, Robustifying learnability. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2009. 33(2): p. 296-316.
A. Onatski, "Winding number criterion for existence and uniqueness of equilibrium in linear rational expectations models," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, vol. 30, pp. 323-345, 2006
Cho, S. and B. McCallum, Another weakness of “determinacy” as a selection criterion for rational expectations models. Economics Letters, 2009. 104(1): p. 17-19.
Bullard, J. and K. Mitra, Learning about monetary policy rules. Journal of monetary economics, 2002. 49(6): p. 1105-1129.
Sims, C., On the generalicity of the winding number criterion for linear rational expectations models. 2007.
Blanchard, O. and S. Fischer, Lectures on macroeconomics. 1989: The MIT press.
Muth, J., Rational expectations and the theory of price movements.Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1961. 29(3): p. 315-33