Gomes, Orlando (2006): The dynamics of television advertising with boundedly rational consumers.
Download (249kB) | Preview
The paper adapts a static model of television advertising into a dynamic scenario. In its original form, the model consists on a profit maximization problem of a television network working in a competitive environment. The network sells commercial time to advertisers and tries to minimize the effects of viewers’ aversion to ads. Viewers are assumed heterogeneous with regard to the preferences over the types of products companies sell through ad time. Into this framework we introduce an intertemporal rule reflecting the possible preference changes of consumers (these are boundedly rational and their utility for different types of products varies over time). The introduction of the intertemporal rule originates interesting dynamic results, namely in what concerns the evolution over time of crucial variables like the total time of broadcasting that networks allocate to advertising or the amount of revenues that satisfies the profit maximization condition. As in the original model, attention will be given to the possibility, that cable television allows, of ad addressability.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Institution:||Escola Superior de Comunicação Social - Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa|
|Original Title:||The dynamics of television advertising with boundedly rational consumers|
|Keywords:||Television advertising; Networks’ profit maximization; Heterogeneous viewers; Ad addressability; Bounded rationality; Nonlinear dynamics|
|Subjects:||L - Industrial Organization > L8 - Industry Studies: Services > L82 - Entertainment; Media
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C61 - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis
M - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting > M3 - Marketing and Advertising > M37 - Advertising
|Depositing User:||Orlando Gomes|
|Date Deposited:||20. Apr 2007|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 19:34|
Anderson, S.; A. de Palma and J. Thisse (1993). Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Anderson, S. P. and J. J. Gabszewicz (2005). “The Media and Advertising: A Tale of Two-Sided Markets.” CEPR discussion paper nº 5223. Benhabib, J. and A. Bisin (2002). “Advertising, Mass Consumption and Capitalism.” New York University working paper. Brock, W. A. and C. H. Hommes (1998). “Heterogeneous Beliefs and Routes to Chaos in a Simple Asset Pricing Model.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, vol. 22, pp. 1235-1274. Branch, W. and B. McGough (2006). “Monetary Policy and Heterogeneous Expectations in a New Keynesian Model.” University of California and Oregon State University. Byzalov, D. and R. Shachar (2004). “The Risk Reduction Role of Advertising.” Quantitative Marketing and Economics, vol. 2, pp. 283-320. Esteban, L.; A. Gil and J. M. Hernandez (2001). “Informative Advertising and Optimal Targeting in a Monopoly.” Journal of Industrial Economics, vol. 49, pp. 161-180. Fare, R.; S. Grosskopf; B. J. Seldon and V. J. Tremblay (2004). “Advertising Efficiency and the Choice of Media Mix: a Case of Beer.” International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol. 22, pp. 503-522. Gabszewicz, J. J.; D. Laussel and N. Sonnac (2004). “Programming and Advertising Competition in the Broadcasting Industry.” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, vol. 13, pp. 657-669. Gaunersdorfer, A. (2000). “Endogenous Fluctuations in a Simple Asset Pricing Model with Heterogeneous Agents.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, vol. 24, pp. 799-831. Goettler, R. (1999). “Advertising Rates, Audience Composition, and Competition in the Network Television Industry.” GSIA working paper nº 1999-28, Carnegie-Mellon University, Tepper School of Business. Gomes, O. (2006). “Optimal Monetary Policy under Heterogeneous Expectations.” The ICFAI Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. IV, pp. 32-51. Gomes, O.; V. M. Mendes; D. A. Mendes and J. Sousa Ramos. “Heterogeneous Inflation Expectations and the Stability of Monetary Policy.” ISCTE Business School working paper. Hirshleifer, D. (2001). “Investor Psychology and Asset Pricing.” Journal of Finance, vol. 56, pp. 1533-1597. Kieshnick, R.; B. McCullough and S. Wildman (2001). “The Market for Television Advertising: Model and Evidence.” Review of Marketing Science, working paper series, Berkeley Electronic Press, nº 1-2-1015. Kim, E. M. and S. S. Wildman (2006). “A Deeper Look at the Economics of Advertiser Support for Television: the Implications of Consumption-Differentiated Viewers and Ad Addressability.” Journal of Media Economics, vol. 19, pp. 55-79. Manski, C. and D. McFadden (1981). Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. McDowell, W. and S. Sunderland (2000). “Choice versus Chance: Using Brand Equity Theory to Explore TV Audience Lead-in Effects, a Case Study.” Journal of Media Economics, vol. 13, pp. 233-247. McFadden, D. (1973). “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior.” In P. Zarembka (ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics. New York: Academic Press, pp.105-142. Medio, A. and M. Lines (2001). Nonlinear Dynamics: a Primer. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Peitz, M. and T. Valletti (2004). “Content and Advertising in the Media: Pay-TV versus Free-to-Air.” CEPR discussion paper nº 4771. Reid, L. N.; K. W. King; H. J. Martin and H. Soh (2005). “Local Advertising Decision Makers’ Perceptions of Media Effectiveness and Substitutability.” Journal of Media Economics, vol. 18, pp. 35-53. Smith, K. (1999). “Preprints versus Display Advertising: Which is More Profitable for Nondaily Newspapers?” Journal of Media Economics, vol. 12, pp. 233-245. Sonnac, N. (2000). “Readers’ Attitudes Toward Press Advertising: Are They Ad-Lovers or Ad-Averse?” Journal of Media Economics, vol. 13, pp. 249-259. Steiner, P. O. (1952). “Program Patterns and Preferences, and the Workability of Competition in Radio Broadcasting.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 66, pp. 194-223.