The Italian Position in the Energy and Climate Change Negotiations

Viviani, Carlo (2010): The Italian Position in the Energy and Climate Change Negotiations. Published in: Review of Economic Conditions in Italy , Vol. 2010, No. 2 (January 2011): pp. 231-278.

Abstract

Climate change, security and cost of energy supplies, and the competitiveness of firms and economies have been focal points of the general political and economic policy debate in recent years.

This article examines the choices in this field made at global level with the Kyoto Protocol and in Europe with the more recent “20-20-20” package from the standpoints of the Italian national interests and the negotiating stance adopted by our Government in European and international forums.

The European negotiations on renewable energy sources, the reduction of emissions in the sectors with and without emissions trading schemes, automobile emissions, the auctioning of emission rights, and the identification of industries exposed to the risk of delocalization (carbon leakage) are described in detail, including background data not previously available, and the reasons for Italy’s positions set forth.

The principle guiding Italian negotiators has been to balance the various policy aims, in an effort to ensure that the necessary action against climate change does not have excessive repercussions on growth and employment. The principle is all the more valid in the global talks on the regime that will succeed the Kyoto Protocol when it expires on 1 January 2013.

Without a credible global agreement entailing an equivalent commitment, or sectoral agreements, instruments will be needed to prevent Europe’s climate commitment from producing an unfair competitive disadvantage, with potentially serious social and economic consequences but no appreciable environmental advantage.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Climate Change; Energy; UNFCCC; ETS; Emissions Trading Scheme; Auctioning; European Union; Italy; Carbon Leakage; Carbon pricing
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H77 - Intergovernmental Relations ; Federalism ; Secession; D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D62 - Externalities; F - International Economics > F2 - International Factor Movements and International Business > F23 - Multinational Firms ; International Business; D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D44 - Auctions; H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H23 - Externalities ; Redistributive Effects ; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies; L - Industrial Organization > L6 - Industry Studies: Manufacturing > L60 - General; F - International Economics > F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance > F42 - International Policy Coordination and Transmission; K - Law and Economics > K3 - Other Substantive Areas of Law > K32 - Environmental, Health, and Safety Law; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F18 - Trade and Environment; F - International Economics > F5 - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy > F53 - International Agreements and Observance ; International Organizations; F - International Economics > F2 - International Factor Movements and International Business > F21 - International Investment ; Long-Term Capital Movements; D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D78 - Positive Analysis of Policy Formulation and Implementation; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O52 - Europe

References

World Commission on Environment and Development (1987), Our Common Future (Brundtland Report), Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. On-line at http://www.un-documents.net/wced-ocf.htm

IPCC (1998), “Principles Governing IPCC Work.” Vienna, 1-3 October. On-line at: http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/ipcc-principles/ipcc-principles.pdf

IPCC (1990), “First Assessment Report.” On-line at: http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ publications_and_data_reports.htm

R. Baron, B. Buchner and J. Ellis (2009), “Sectoral Approaches and the Carbon Market” (IEA/OECD)

G.J.M.Phylipsen, J.W. Bode, K. Blok, H. Merkus and B. Metz (1998), “A Triptych sectoral approach to burden differentiation: GHG emissions in the European bubble – Negotiating Targets”, Energy Policy 26/12

BMWi (2010), “Energieszenarien für ein Energiekonzept der Bundesregierung,” at http://www.bmwi.de/BMWi/Navigation/Service/publikationen,did=356294.html

Institute for European Environmental Policy (2007), “Possible regulatory approaches to reducing CO2 emissions from cars – Final Report and Technical notes,”

European Commission (2007), “Proposal from the Commission to the European Parliament and Council for a Regulation to reduce CO2 emissions from passenger cars – Impact Assessment.”

Noriko Fujiwara (2010) “The merit of sectoral approaches in transitioning towards a global carbon market”, CEPS Special Report

Gwin Prins et al. (2010), The Hartwell Paper, LSE. Available online at http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/mackinderProgramme/theHartwellPaper/Default.htm