Asproudis, Elias and Weyman-Jones, Tom (2011): Third parties �participation in tradable permits market. Do we need them?
Download (142kB) | Preview
This paper analyses the behaviour, influence and role of third parties in tradable permits markets. Following the literature, it focuses on a framework in order to understand how society and third parties react against the firms' emissions due to their participation in the tradable permits' market. Therefore the paper reveals the tradable permits mechanism as a new way for public direct action and highlights the possible benefits for the regulator. An important part of the third parties consists of the very active participation of the Environmental Non Governmental Organisations. Therefore, this paper argues that the third party's participation and specifically the environmental groups' participation in tradable permits' market could drive the market to the optimum equilibrium. In order to examine this "proposition" we use some data from the first phase of the permits' market in European Union and some available data for the environmental groups' income. We conclude that the environmental groups could purchase the exceeded, overallocated permits and could drive the market in the equilibrium point. Finally, for the regulator the environmental groups' participation could be desirable given that they could improve the efficiency of the tradable permits market.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Third parties �participation in tradable permits market. Do we need them?|
|Keywords:||emissions; permits; overallocation; third parties; environmental groups; equilibrium|
|Subjects:||Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q50 - General
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q53 - Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling
L - Industrial Organization > L3 - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise > L31 - Nonprofit Institutions; NGOs
|Depositing User:||Elias Asproudis|
|Date Deposited:||04. Oct 2011 13:10|
|Last Modified:||11. Feb 2013 11:51|
Ahlheim, M., Schneider, F., 2002. Allowing for household preferences in emission trading. Environmental and Resource Economics 21, 317--342.
Anderson, B., Di Maria, C., 2011. Abatement and allocation in the pilot phase of the EU ETS. Environmental and Resource Economics 48, 83--103.
Baumol, W.J., Oates, W.E., 1988. The theory of environmental policy, second ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Boyd, J., Conley, J., 1997. Fundamental nonconvexities in Arrovian markets and a Coasian solution to the problem of externalities. Journal of Economic Theory 72, 388--407.
Carman, C.J., 2002. Brokering interests: the use of market-based policies by interest groups. Social Science Quarterly 83, 137--155.
Coase, R., 1960. The Problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics 3, 1--44.
Conley, J., Smith, S., 2005. Coasian equilibrium. Journal of Mathematical Economics 41, 687--704.
Convery, F.J., 2009. Origins and development of the EU ETS. Environmental and Resource Economics 43, 391--412.
Crocker, T.D., 1966. The Structuring of Atmospheric Pollution Control Systems, in: Wolozin, H., (Eds.), The Economics of Air Pollution. W.W. Norton and Co, New York, pp. 61-86.
Dales, J.H., 1968. Pollution, property and prices, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
English, D., Yates, A., 2007. Citizens' demand for permits and Kwerel's incentive compatible mechanism for pollution control. Economics Bulletin 17, 1--9.
Eshel, D.M.D., Sexton, J.R., 2009. Allowing communities to trade in imperfectly competitive pollution-permit markets. Journal of Regulatory Economics 36, 60--82.
European Commission., 2001. Proposal for a directive of the european parliament and of the council establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the community and amending council directive 96/61/E.C. COM (2001) 581 Final.
European Commission., 2003. Directive 2003/87/E.C. of the european parliament and of the council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the community and amending council directive 96/61/E.C.
Frank, R.H., 2001. The economist as public intellectual: a case for selling Pareto improvements. Eastern Economic Journal 27, 221--225.
Gorman, H.S., Solomon, B.D., 2002. The origins and practice of emissions trading. Journal of Policy History 14, 293--320.
Hahn, R.W., Stavins, R.N., 1991. Incentive-based environmental regulation: a new era from an old idea? Ecology Law Quarterly 18, 23--25.
Heyes, A., Liston C., 2006. Economics of environmental regulation: instruments and cases, in: Crew, M. A., Parker, D., (Eds.), International Handbook on Economic Regulation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 255--277.
Hintermann, B., 2010. Allowance price drivers in the first phase of the EU ETS. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 59, 43--56.
Israel, D., 2007. Environmental participation in the U.S. sulphur allowance auctions. Environmental and Resource Economics 38, 373--390.
Joskow, P.L., Schmalensee, R., Bailey, E.M., 1998. The market for sulfur dioxide emissions. American Economic Review 88, 669--685.
Kneese, A.V., Schultze, C.L., 1975. Pollution, prices and public policy, Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C.
Kruger, J., Dean, M., 1997. Looking back on SO₂ trading: what's good for the environment is good for the market. Public Utilities Fortnightly 135, 30--37.
Krupnick, A.J., Oates, W.E., Van de Verg, E., 1983. On marketable air-pollution permits: the case for a system of pollution offsets. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 10, 233--247.
Kwerel, E., 1977. To Tell the truth: imperfect information and optimal pollution control. Review of Economic Studies 44, 595--601.
Malueg, D.A., Yates, A.J., 2006. Citizen participation in pollution permit markets. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 51, 205--217.
McKibbin, W.J., Wilcoxen, P.J., 2002. The role of economics in climate change policy. Journal of Economic Perspectives 16, 107--129.
Mackintosh, D.R., 1973. The economics of airborne emissions: the case for an air rights market, Praeger Publishers, New York.
Montgomery, W.D., 1972. Markets in licenses and efficient pollution control program. Journal of Economic Theory 5, 395--418.
Newbery, D.M., 2008. Climate change policy and its effect on market power in the gas market. Journal of the European Economic Association 6, 727--751.
Pearce, D.W., 2002. An intellectual history of environmental economics. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 27, 57--81.
Rousse, O., 2008. Environmental and economic benefits resulting from citizens' participation in CO₂ emissions trading: an efficient alternative solution to the voluntary compensation of CO₂ emissions. Energy Policy 36, 388--397.
Schwarze, R., Zapfel, P., 2000. Sulfur allowance trading and the regional clean air incentives market: a comparative design analysis of two major cap-and-trade permit programs? Environmental and Resource Economics 17, 279--298.
Shrestha, R., 1998. Uncertainty and the choice of policy instruments: a note on Baumol and Oates propositions. Environmental and Resource Economics 12, 497--505.
Smith, C.S., Yates, J.A., 2003a. Optimal pollution permit endowments in markets with endogenous emissions. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 46, 425--445.
Smith, C.S., Yates, J.A., 2003b. Should consumers be priced out of pollution-permit markets? Journal of Economic Education 34, 181--189.
Stavins, R.N., 1998. What can we learn from the grand policy experiment? Lessons from SO₂ allowance trading. Journal of Economic Perspectives 12, 69--88.
Svendsen, G.T., 1999. U.S. interest groups prefer emission trading: a new perspective. Public Choice 101, 109--128.
Tietenberg, T.H., 1990. Economic instruments for environmental regulation. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 9, 17--33.
Tietenberg, T.H., 2003. The tradable-permits approach to protecting the commons: lessons for climate change. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 19, 400--419.
UNFCCC., 2001. Review of the implementation of commitments and of other provisions of the convention. Preparations for the first session of the conference of the parties serving as the meeting of the parties to the Kyoto protocol (decision 8/cp.4). Decisions concerning guidelines under articles 5, 7 and 8 of the Kyoto protocol. FCCC/CP/2001/2/Add.4.
Wapner, P., 1995. Politics beyond the state: environmental activism and world civic politics. World Politics 47, 311--340.
Wood, P.J., Jotzo, F., 2011. Price floors for emissions trading. Energy Policy, 39, 1746--1753.