Polishchuk, Leonid and Borisova, Ekaterina (2010): Performance assessment of Russian homeowners associations : The importance of being social. Published in:
Download (768kB) | Preview
Performance of Russian homeowners associations – non-profits established to manage common property in residential housing – is assessed using the stochastic frontier technique, which is a powerful tool of productivity analysis. Performance variations are explained by physical and social factors, prominent among them is the availability of social capital among tenants, required to resolve collective action problems and ensure accountability of managing bodies and outside contractors. Lack of civic capacity could be an obstacle to implementing community-governance solutions in residential housing, making homeowners associations dysfunctional or prone to capture by vested interests.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Performance assessment of Russian homeowners associations : The importance of being social|
|English Title:||Performance assessment of Russian homeowners associations : The importance of being social|
|Keywords:||homeowners associations; non-profit organizations; common property; stochastic frontier; social capital|
|Subjects:||P - Economic Systems > P2 - Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies > P25 - Urban, Rural, and Regional Economics
L - Industrial Organization > L3 - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise > L31 - Nonprofit Institutions; NGOs
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C0 - General > C01 - Econometrics
|Depositing User:||Ekaterina Borisova|
|Date Deposited:||28. Mar 2011 10:20|
|Last Modified:||19. Feb 2013 11:47|
Aghion, Ph., Algan, Y., Cahuc, P., and A. Shleifer Regulation and Distrust. NBER Working Paper No. w14648, 2009.
Araral, E. What Explains Collective Action in the Commons? Theory and Evidence from the Philippines. World Development, 37(3), 2009, 687–697.
Bengtsson, Bo. Tenants’ Dilemma – On Collective Action in Housing. Housing Studies, 13(1), 1998, 99–120.
Borisova, E., and L. Polishchuk Efficiency Analysis in the Non-profit Sector: Issues and Solutions (In Russian). Economic Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 13(1), 80–100.
Borisova, E., A. Peresetsky, and L. Polishchuk. Production Possibility Frontier is Non-Profits’ Performance Assessment: The Case of Homeowners’ Associations. (In Russian). Forthcoming in Prikladnaya Ekonometrika, 2010.
Chen, S., and C. Webster. Homeowners Associations, Collective Actions, and the Costs of Private Governance. Housing Studies, 20(2), 2005, 205–220.
DiPasquale, D., and E. Glaeser. Incentives and Social Capital: Are Homeowners Better Citizens? Journal of Urban Economics, 45(2), 1999, 354–384.
Fukuyama, F. Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: Free Press, 1995
Grossman, S., and O. Hart. The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration. Journal of Political Economy, 94(4), 1986, 691–719.
Halpern, D. Social Capital. Polity Press, 2005.
Katz, Y., Neuman, S. Agricultural Land Transactions in Palestine, 1900–1914: A Quantitative Analysis. Explorations in Economic History, 27(1), 1990, 29–45.
Keefer, Ph., and S. Knack. Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff? A Cross-Country Investigation, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1997, 251–88.
Lovell, C. Production Frontiers and Productive Efficiency, in H. Fried, C. Lovell and S.Schmidt (Eds.), The Measurement of Productive Efficiency, Oxford University Press, 1994, 3–67.
Ostrom, E. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, 1990.
Ostrom, E. Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 2000, 137–158.
Olson, M. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Harvard University Press, 1965.
Putnam, R. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1993.
Roland, G. Understanding Institutional Change: Fast-Moving and Slow-Moving Institutions. Studies in Comparative International Development, 38(4), 2004, 109–131.
Rose, R. Uses of Social Capital in Russia: Modern, Pre-Modern, and Anti-Modern. Post-Soviet Affairs, 16(1), 2000, 33–56.
Saegert, S., and G. Winkel Social Capital and the Revitalization of New York City’s Distressed Inner-City Housing. Housing Policy Debate, 9(1), 1998, 17–60.
Sivaev, S. 2003–2008 Residential Housing Reform: A Winding Path to the Market. (in Russian). Institute for Urban Economics, 2009.
Tabellini, G. The Scope of Cooperation: Values and Incentives. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2008a.
Tabellini, G. Institutions and Culture. Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(2–3), 2008b, 255–294.
Vihavainen, R. Homeowners’ Associations in Russia. After the 2005 Housing Reform. Kikimora Publications, 2009.
Yermishsina, A. Institutionalization of an ‘effective owner’ in an apartment building. (In Russian). Mimeo, 2009.
Yasin, E. Political Economy of Residential Housing Reform. (In Russian). Liberal Mission Foundation, 2006.