On Smith's ambiguities on value and wealth

Meacci, Ferdinando (2010): On Smith's ambiguities on value and wealth. Forthcoming in:

Abstract

Ricardo’s criticisms of Adam Smith on value and wealth have been sometimes rejected and sometimes accepted in the period following the publication of his Principles. By contrast, they have been mostly ignored in the recent revivals of Ricardian economics both in the branch concerned with value and distribution and in the branch devoted to wealth and equilibrium growth. This paper intends to fill the gap between these two branches by revisiting Smith’s link between value and wealth in the light of Ricardo’s criticisms. This is done in two steps. The first step is provided in Part I and deals with Ricardo’s criticisms i) of Say’s and Lauderdale’s criticisms of Smith on this issue, and ii) of Smith’s and Malthus’ arguments on the related issues of rent and of the “annual produce of the land and labour of a country”. The second step is provided in Part II. The aim of this Part is to dissolve Smith’s terminological inaccuracies or contradictions by disentangling them from the analytical foundations of his system of thought. This is done by re-examining Smith’s arguments on value and wealth in the light of two distinctions. One runs between the two points of view –of an individual and of society– which underlie the whole of his system of thought. The other is put forward by Smith himself in a neglected passage of the Wealth and runs between the notions of “work done” and “work to be done”. Both distinctions are then utilized to revisit the principle of exchangeable value as command of labour in the economy as a whole and in the sense of work to be done. The paper is closed by arguing that this principle is needed for supporting the idea of a permanent increase in the natural price of labour (in Smith’s rather than in Ricardo’s sense) in economies exposed to a continuous process of accumulation.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Smith, Ricardo, value, wealth, labour
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925 > B12 - Classical (includes Adam Smith); B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B0 - General

References

Bailey, S. (1825 [1967]), A critical dissertation on the nature, measures and causes of value, New York: A. M. Kelley

Bladen, V.W. (1975), “Command over labour: A study in misinterpretation”, Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol. 8, pp. 504-519

Blaug, M. (1959), “Welfare Indices in "The Wealth of Nations", Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 26, pp. 150-153

Blaug, M. (1997), Economic theory in retrospect, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Cannan, E. (1924 [1967]), A history of the theories of production & distribution in English political economy from 1776 to 1848, New York: Kelley

Cassels, J. M. (1935), “A Re-Interpretation of Ricardo on Value”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 49, pp. 518-532

De Quincey, T. (1844 [1970]), The logic of political economy, New York: A. M. Kelley

Dobb, M. (1975), “Ricardo and Adam Smith”, in Skinner and Wilson (eds) (1975, pp.324-35)

Gehrke, C. and Kurz, H. D. (2001), “Say and Ricardo on value and distribution”, European Journal for the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 8, pp.449-486

Hollander, J. H. (1904), “The Development of Ricardo’s Theory of Value”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 18, pp. 455-491

Hollander, S. (1973), The economics of Adam Smith, Toronto: University of Toronto Press

Hollander, S. (1977), “The Reception of Ricardian Economics”, Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 29, pp. 221-257

Hollander, S. (1979), The economics of David Ricardo, London: Heinemann

Hollander, S. (1997), The economics of Thomas Robert Malthus, Toronto: University of Toronto Press

Hollander, S. (2005), Jean-Baptiste Say and the classic canon in economics, London and New York: Routledge

Hueckel, G. (2000), “On the ‘Insurmountable Difficulties, Obscurity, and Embarassment’ of Smith’s Fifth Chapter”, History of Political Economy, Vol. 32, pp.317-345

Kaushil, S. (1973), “The Case of Adam Smith's Value Analysis”, Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 25, pp. 60-71

Lauderdale, J. M. (1804 [1962]), An inquiry into the nature and origin of public wealth and into the means and causes of its increase, New York: A. M. Kelley, 1962

MacDonald, R. A. (1912), Ricardo's Criticisms of Adam Smith, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 26, pp. 549-592

Malthus, T. R. (1827 [1986]), Definitions in political economy, London: W. Pickering, Vol. 8

Malthus, T. R. (1836 [1986]), Principles of political economy, London: W. Pickering, 1986, Vols 5-6

Meacci, F. (2006), “The competition-of-capitals doctrine and the wage-profit relationship”, in Salvadori N. (ed.), Economic growth and distribution: on the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, Aldershot: E. Elgar, pp.58-74.

Meek, R. L. (1973), Studies in the labour theory of value, London: Lawrence & Wishart

Myint, H. (1962), Theories of welfare economics, New York: A. M. Kelley

O’Brien, D. P. (2004), The classical economists revisited, Princeton: Princeton University Press

O’Donnel, R. (1990), Adam Smith’s theory of value and distribution: A reappraisal, London: Macmillan

Peach, T. (1993), Interpreting Ricardo, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Peach, T. (2008), “A Note of Dissent on the "Index Number" Interpretation of Adam Smith's Real Measure of Exchangeable Value”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 32, pp. 821-826.

Peach, T. (2009), “Adam Smith and the Labor Theory of (Real) Value: A Reconsideration”, History of Political Economy, Vol. 41, pp.383-406

Ricardo, D. (1821), On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, in Sraffa P. (ed.), (1951-1973), Vol.I

Ricardo, D. (1823), “Absolute Value and Exchangeable Value”, in Sraffa P. (ed.) (1951-1973), Vol. IV, pp.357-412

Robertson, H. M. (1976), “Euge! Belle! Dear Mr. Smith: The Wealth of Nations, 1776–1976”, South African Journal of Economics, Vol. 44, 378-411

Robertson, H. M. and Taylor, W. L. (1957), “Adam Smith's Approach to the Theory of Value”, The Economic Journal, Vol. 67, pp. 181-198

Samuelson, P. A. (1977), “A Modern Theorist's Vindication of Adam Smith”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 67, pp. 42-49

Say, J.-B. (1814-1819 [1996]), Traité d'economie politique, Paris: Flammarion

Schumpeter, J. (1954), History of economic analysis, New York: Oxford Economic Press

Senior, N. W. (1836 [1965]), An outline of the science of political economy, New York: A. M. Kelley

Skinner, A. S. and Wilson, T. (1975), Essays on Adam Smith, Oxford: Clarendon Press

Smith, A. (1776 [1976]), An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Oxford: Oxford University Press

Sraffa, P. (ed.) (1951-1973), The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 11 Vols