Turel, Asli (2010): Timeliness of financial reporting in emerging capital markets:Evidence from Turkey. Published in: Istanbul University Journal of the School of Business Administration , Vol. 2, No. 39 (November 2010): pp. 227-240.
Download (670Kb) | Preview
Timely financial reporting is an essential ingredient for a well-functioning capital market. This study has two objectives. The first one is to measure the extend of timeliness of financial reporting in a developing country, Turkey. The second one is to establish the impact of both company specific and audit related factors on timeliness of financial reporting in Turkey. This study reports on the results of an empirical investigation of the timeliness of financial reports by 211 non-financial companies listed on the Istanbul Stock Exchange. The descriptive analysis indicates that 59% of the companies that prepares separate financial statements and 66% of the companies that prepares consolidated financial statements release their financial statements less than the maximum time allowed after the financial year-end. 28% of the companies that prepares separate financial statements and 16% of the companies that prepares consolidated financial statements exceeded the regulatory deadline. The multivariate regression analysis indicates that both sign of income, audit opinion, auditor firm and industry affect timeliness. The findings indicate that the companies, which report net income, have standard audit opinion, and operate in manufacturing industry release their financial statements earlier while the companies are audited by the big four audit firms report their financial statements later.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Timeliness of financial reporting in emerging capital markets:Evidence from Turkey|
|Keywords:||Timeliness, financial reporting, accounting, Turkey|
|Subjects:||M - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting > M4 - Accounting and Auditing > M41 - Accounting
M - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting > M4 - Accounting and Auditing
|Depositing User:||ASLI TUREL|
|Date Deposited:||29. Mar 2011 19:06|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 07:42|
 Türk Ticaret Kanunu, Resmi Gazete, 09.07.1956 No: 9353.
 Sermaye Piyasası Kurulu, Seri: XI No:1 “Sermaye Piyasasında Mali Tablo ve Raporlara liskin lke ve Kurallar Hakkında Tebligi”, Resmi Gazete, 29.1.1989, No:20064.
 Sermaye Piyasası Kurulu, Seri: XI No:25 “Sermaye Piyasasında Muhasebe Standartları Hakkında Tebligi”, Resmi Gazete, 15.11.2003, No: 25290.
 Sermaye Piyasası Kurulu, Seri: XI No: 29 “Sermaye Piyasasında Finansal Raporlamaya liskin Esaslar Tebligi”, Resmi Gazete, 9.4.2008, No: 26842.
 M.A. Hossain, P. Taylor, An Examination of Audit Delay: Evidence from Pakistan. Working Paper, University of Manchester (1998).
 E. Bonson-Ponte, et al., Empirical Analysis of Delays in the Signing of Audit Reports in Spain. International Journal of Auditing. 12, 129-140 (2008).
 S.O. Ansah, S. Leventis, Timeliness of Corporate Annual Financial Reporting in Greece. European Accounting Review. 15, 2, 273-287 (2006).
 R.A.R. Ahmad, K.A. Kamarudin, Audit Delay and the Timeliness of Corporate Reporting: Malaysian Evidence. Communication Hawaii International Conference on Business. June, University of Hawaii-West Oahu (2003).
 S.O. Ansah, Timeliness of Corporate Financial Reporting in Emerging Capital Markets: Empirical Evidence From the Zimbabwe Stock Exchange. Accounting and Business Research. 30, 3, 241-254 (2000).
 I. Haw, D. Qi, W. Wu, Timeliness of Annual Report Releases and Market Reaction to Earnings Announcements in an Emerging Capital Market: The Case of China. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting. 11, 2, 108-131 (2000).
 C. Carslaw, S.E. Kaplan, An Examination of Audit Delay: Further Evidence from New Zealand. Accounting and Business Research. 22, 85, 21-32 (1991).
 R.H. Ashton, et al., Audit Delay and The Timeliness of Corporate Reporting. Contemporary Accounting Research. 5, 2, 657-673 (1989).
 R.H. Ashton, et al., An Emprical Analysis of Audit Delay. Journal of Accounting Research. Autumn, 275-292 (1987).
 J.K. Courtis, Relationships Between Timeliness in Corporate Repoting and Corporate Attributes. Accounting and Business Research. Winter, 204-219 (1976).
 B. Davies, G.P. Whittred, The Association Between Selected Corporate Attributes and Timeliness in Corporate Reporting: Further Analysis. Abacus. 16, 1, 48-60 (1980).
 D.M. Gilling, Timeliness in Corporate Reporting: Some Further Comment. Accounting and Business Research. 8, 35-50 (1977).
 J.D. Newton, R.H. Ashton, The Association Between Audit Technology and Audit Delay. Auditing: A Journal of Practice&Theory. 22-37 (1989).
 J.Y.A., Abdulla, The Timeliness of Bahraini Annual Reports. Advances in International Accounting. 9, 73-88 (1996).
 E.M. Bamber, et al., Audit Structure and Other Determinants of Audit Report Lag: An Emprical Analysis. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory. 12, 1, 1-23 (1993).
 D. Givoly, D. Palmon, Timeliness of Annual Earnings Announcements: Some Empirical Evidence. Accounting Review. 57, 3, 485-508 (1982).
 D.D. Williams, M.W. Dirsmith, The Effects of Audit Technology on Auditor Efficiency: Auditing and the Timeliness of Client Earnings Announcements. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 13, 5, 487-508 (1988).
 P.P. Ng, B.Y.K. Tai, An Empirical Examination of the Determinants of Audit Delay in Hong Kong. British Accounting Review. 26, 1, 43-59 (1994).