Lo, Alex Y. and Spash, Clive L. (2011): Articulation of Plural Values in Deliberative Monetary Valuation: Beyond Preference Economisation and Moralisation.
Download (121kB) | Preview
The use of deliberative methods to assess environmental values in monetary terms has been motivated by the potential for small group discussion to help with preference formation and the inclusion of non-economic values. In this review, two broad approaches are identified: preference economisation and preference moralisation. The former is analytical, concentrates upon issues of poor respondent cognition and produces a narrow conception of value linked to utilitarianism. The latter emphasises political legitimacy, appeals to community values and tends to privilege arguments made in the public interest. Both approaches are shown to embrace forms of value convergence which undermine the prospects for value pluralism. As a result exclusion and predefinition of values dominates current practice. In order to maintain democratic credentials, the importance attributed to monetary value needs to be left as an open question to be addressed as part of a process determining an ‘agreement to pay’. To this end we identify a discourse-based approach as a third way consistent with the democratic and value plural potential of deliberative monetary valuation.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Articulation of Plural Values in Deliberative Monetary Valuation: Beyond Preference Economisation and Moralisation|
|Keywords:||environmental valuation; deliberation; stated preferences; democracy; willingness to pay; value pluralism|
|Subjects:||D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure and Pricing > D46 - Value Theory
D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D03 - Behavioral Economics; Underlying Principles
A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A13 - Relation of Economics to Social Values
D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D02 - Institutions: Design, Formation, and Operations
D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D61 - Allocative Efficiency; Cost-Benefit Analysis
D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D78 - Positive Analysis of Policy-Making and Implementation
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q51 - Valuation of Environmental Effects
|Depositing User:||Clive L. Spash|
|Date Deposited:||04. Apr 2011 07:01|
|Last Modified:||16. Feb 2013 00:29|
Aldred, J. (2005) Consumer valuation and citizen deliberation: Towards a comparison. In M. Getzner, C. L. Spash & S. Stagl (eds.) Alternatives for Environmental Valuation (pp. 225-243). London, New York: Routledge.
Álvarez-Farizo, B., Gil, J. M., and Howard, B. J. (2009) Impacts from restoration strategies: Assessment through valuation workshops. Ecological Economics 68: 787-797.
Álvarez-Farizo, B., and Hanley, N. (2006) Improving the process of valuing non-market benefits: Combining citizens' juries with choice modelling. Land Economics 82(3): 465-478.
Álvarez-Farizoa, B., Hanley, N., Barberán, R., and Lázaro, A. (2007) Choice modeling at the "market stall": Individual versus collective interest in environmental valuation. Ecological Economics 60: 743-751.
Bateman, I.J., Burgess, D., Hutchinson, W.G. and Matthews, D.I. (2008) Learning design contingent valuation (LDCV): NOAA guidelines, preference learning and coherent arbitrariness. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 55: 127-141.
Bohman, J. (1996) Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Bohman, J. and Rehg, W. (eds.) (1997) Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Brown, T. C., Peterson, G. L., and Tonn, B. E. (1995) The values jury to aid natural resource decisions. Land Economics 71(2): 250-260.
Clark, J., Burgess, J. and Harrison, C. M. (2000) "I struggled with this money business": respondents' perspectives on contingent valuation. Ecological Economics 33: 45-62.
Cohen, J. (1989) Deliberative democracy and democratic legitimacy. In A. Hamlin & P. Pettit (eds.) The Good Polity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Dietz, T. (1994) What should we do? Human ecology and collective decision making. Human Ecology Review 1: 301-309.
Dietz, T., Stern, P.C. and Dan, A. (2009) How deliberation affects stated willingness to pay for mitigation of carbon dioxide emissions: An experiment. Land Economics 85(2): 329-347.
Dryzek, J. S. (1990) Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy, and Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dryzek, J. S. (2000) Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Dryzek, J.S. (2011) Foundations and frontiers of deliberative governance Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Dryzek, J. S., and Niemeyer, S. (2008) Discursive Representation. American Political Science Review 102(4): 481-493.
Douai, A. (2009) Value theory in ecological economics: The contribution of a political economy of wealth. Environmental Values 18: 257-284.
Failing, L., Gregory, R., and Harstone, M. (2007) Integrating science and local knowledge in environmental risk management: A decision-focused approach. Ecological Economics 64: 47-60.
Gowdy, J. and Parks, S., (forthcoming) The theoretical, behavioral and neurological arguments for deliberative valuation.
Gregory, R. (2000). Valuing environmental policy options: A case study comparison of multiattribute and contingent valuation survey methods. Land Economics 76(2): 151-173.
Gregory, R., Fischhoff, B., and McDaniels, T. (2005) 'Acceptable inputs: Using decision analysis to guide public policy deliberations'. Decision Analysis 2 (1): 4-16.
Gregory, R., Lichtenstein, S., and Slovic, P. (1993) Valuing environmental resources: A constructive approach. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 7: 177-197.
Gregory, R. and Slovic, P. (1997) A constructive approach to environmental valuation. Ecological Economics 21: 175-181.
Gregory, R. and Wellman, K. (2001) Bringing stakeholder values into environmental policy choices: a community-based estuary case study. Ecological Economics 39(1): 37-52.
Gutmann, A. and Thompson, D. (1996) Democracy and Disagreement Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press.
Gutmann, A. and Thompson, D. (2004) Why deliberative democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Habermas, J., (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action I: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston: Beacon Press.
Hanley, N. and Shogren, J.F. (2005) 'Is cost-benefit analysis anomaly-proof?' Environmental and Resource Economics 32(1): 13-34.
Howarth, R. B., and Wilson, M. A. (2006) A theoretical approach to deliberative valuation: aggregation by mutual consent. Land Economics 82(1): 1-16.
Ito, N., Takeuchi, K., Kuriyama, K., Shoji, Y., Tsuge, T. and Mitani, Y. (2009) The influence of decision-making rules on individual preferences for ecological restoration: Evidence from an experimental survey. Ecological Economics 68: 2426-2431.
Jacobs, M. (1997) Environmental valuation, deliberative democracy and public decision-making institutions. In J. Foster (ed.) Valuing Nature?: Ethics, Economics and the Environment. London: Routledge.
James, R. F., and Blamey, R. K. (2005) Deliberation and economic valuation: national park management. In M. Getzner, C. L. Spash & S. Stagl (eds.) Alternatives for Environmental Valuation (pp. 225-243). London, New York: Routledge.
Jorgensen, B. S., Wilson, M. A., Heberlein, T. A. (2001) Fairness in the contingent valuation of environmental public goods: Attitude toward paying for environmental improvements at two levels of scope. Ecological Economics 36: 133-148.
Jorgensen, B. (2009) Social learning and the economic valuation of environmental impacts: A real contribution or a missed opportunity? In J. Martin, M. Rogers & C. Winter (eds.) Climate Change in Regional Australia: Social Learning and Adaptation. Victoria: VURRN Press.
Kahneman, D. and Knetsch, J. L. (1992) 'Valuing public goods: the purchase of moral satisfaction'. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 22: 57-70.
Kahneman, D., Ritov, I. and Schkade, D. (1999) 'Economic preferences or attitude expressions?: an analysis of dollar responses to public issues'. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 19(1-3): 203-235.
Keeney, R. (1992) Value-focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Knetsch, J. L. (1994) Environmental valuation: Some problems of wrong questions and misleading answers. Environmental Values 3(4): 351-368.
Lienhoop, N., and MacMillan, D. C. (2007) Valuing wilderness in Iceland: estimation of WTA and WTP using the market stall approach to contingent valuation. Land Use Policy 24(11): 289-295.
Lo, A. Y. (forthcoming) Analysis and democracy: The antecedents of the deliberative approach of ecosystems valuation. Environment and Planning C..
Macmillan, D. C., Hanley, N., and Lienhoop, N. (2006) Contingent valuation: environmental polling or preference engine? Ecological Economics 60(1): 299-307.
Macmillan, D. C., Philip, L., Hanley, N., and Alvarez-Farizo, B. (2002) Valuing the non-market benefits of wild goose conservation: a comparison of interview and group-based approaches. Ecological Economics 43(1): 49-59.
McDaniels, T.L., Gregory, R., and Fields, D. (1999) Democratizing risk management: Successful public involvement in local water management decisions. Risk Analysis 19(3): 497-510.
McDaniels, T. L., Gregory, R., Arvai, J., and Chuenpagde, R. (2003) Decision structuring to alleviate embedding in environmental valuation. Ecological Economics 46: 33-46.
Munda, G. (1995) Multicriteria Evaluation in a Fuzzy Environment. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.
Niemeyer, S., and Spash, C. (2001) Environmental valuation analysis, public deliberation, and their pragmatic syntheses: a critical appraisal. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 19: 567-585.
Norgaard, R. B. (2007) Deliberative economics. Ecological Economics 63: 375-382.
O'Hara, S. U. (1996) Discursive ethics in ecosystems valuation and environmental policy. Ecological Economics 16: 95-107.
O'Hara, S.U. (2001) The challenges of valuation: Ecological economics between matter and meaning. In C.J. Cleveland, D.I. Stern & R. Costanza (eds.) The Economics of Nature and the Nature of Economics Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, Mass.: Edward Elgar, 89-110.
O'Neill, J. (2007). Markets, Deliberation and Environment London: Routledge.
Orr, S. W. (2007) Values, preferences, and the citizen–consumer distinction in cost–benefit analysis. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6(1): 107-130.
Peterson, G.L., B.L. Driver and R. Gregory (eds). (1988) Amenity Resource Valuation: Integrating Economics with Other Disciplines. State College, PA: Venture Publishing.
Philip, L. J., and MacMillan, D. C. (2005) Exploring values, context and perceptions in contingent valuation studies: The CV market stall technique and willingness to pay for wildlife conservation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 48(2): 257-274.
Powe, N.A. (2007) Redesigning environmental valuation: Mixing methods within stated preference techniques Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Rawls, J. (1997) The idea of public reason revisited. The University of Chicago Law Review 64(3): 765-807.
Robinson, J. J. (2002). Environmental value transfer: An application for the South East Queensland waterways. Water Science and Technology 45(11): 91-100.
Robinson, J. J., Clouston, B., Suh, J., and Chaloupka, M. (2009) Are citizens' juries a useful tool for assessing environmental value? Environmental Conservation 35(4): 351-360.
Sagoff, M., (1988) The Economy of the Earth: Philosophy, Law, and the Environment Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Sagoff, M. (1998) Aggregation and deliberation in valuing environmental public goods: a look beyond contingent pricing. Ecological Economics 24: 213-230.
Söderbaum, P. And Brown, J. (2010) Democratizing economics: Pluralism as a path toward sustainability. Annals of The New York Academy of Sciences 1185: 179-195.
Spash, C. L. (2000a) Multiple value expression in contingent valuation: Economics and ethics. Environmental Science & Technology 34(8): 1433-1438.
Spash, C. L. (2000b) Ecosystems, contingent valuation and ethics: The case of wetlands re-creation. Ecological Economics 34(2): 195-215.
Spash, C. L. (2006) Non-economic motivation for contingent values: Rights and attitudinal beliefs in the willingness to pay for environmental improvements. Land Economics 82(4): 602-622.
Spash, C. L. (2007) Deliberative monetary valuation (DMV): issues in combining economic and political processes to value environmental change. Ecological Economics 63(4) 690-699.
Spash, C. L. (2008a) Deliberative monetary valuation and the evidence for a new value theory. Land Economics 84(3): 469-488.
Spash, C. L. (2008b) Contingent valuation design and data treatment: If you can't shoot the messenger, change the message. Environment & Planning C: Government & Policy 26(1): 34-53
Spash, C. L., Stagl, S., and Getzner, M. (2005) Exploring alternatives for environmental valuation. In M. Getzner, C. L. Spash & S. Stagl (eds.) Alternatives for Environmental Valuation. London; New York: Routledge.
Spash, C. L., Urama, K., Burton, R., Kenyon, W., Shannon, P., Hill, G. (2009) Motives behind willingness to pay for improving biodiversity in a water ecosystem: Economics, ethics and social psychology. Ecological Economics 68: 955-964.
Spash, C. L., and Vatn, A. (2006) Transferring environmental value estimates: Issues and alternatives. Ecological Economics 60: 379-388.
Stirling, A. (1997) Multi-criteria mapping: Mitigating the problems of environmental valuation? In J. Foster (ed.) Valuing Nature?: Ethics, Economics and the Environment London: Routledge.
Stirling, A. (2006) Analysis, participation and power: Justification and closure in participatory multi-criteria analysis. Land Use Policy 23: 95-107.
Urama, K. C., and Hodge, I. (2006) Participatory environmental education and willingness to pay for river basin management: empirical evidence from Nigeria. Land Economics 82(4): 542-561.
Vatn, A. (2005) Institutions and the Environment. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
Vatn, A. (2009) An institutional analysis of methods for environmental appraisal. Ecological Economics 68: 2207-2215.
Vatn, A. and Bromley, D. W. (1994) Choices without prices without apologies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26: 129-148.
Ward, H. (1999) Citizens' juries and valuing the environment: a proposal. Environmental Politics 8(2): 75-96.
Wilson, M. A., and Howarth, R. B. (2002) Discourse-based valuation of ecosystem services: establishing fair outcomes through group deliberation. Ecological Economics 41: 431-443.
Zografos, C., and Howarth, R. B. (eds.) (2008) Deliberative Ecological Economics. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.