Halkos, George and Tzeremes, Nickolaos (2011): Population density and regional welfare efficiency.
Download (1MB) | Preview
This paper demonstrates an evaluation of welfare policies and regional allocation of public investment using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Specifically, the efficiency of the welfare policies of the Greek prefectures for the census years of 1980, 1990 and 2000 are compared and analyzed. The paper using bootstrap techniques on unconditional and conditional full frontier applications determines whether the government investments have been used efficiently by the local authorities in order to stimulate regional welfare among the Greek prefectures. Our empirical results indicate that there are major welfare inefficiencies among the prefectures over the three census years. The analysis reveals that the population density among the Greek prefectures hasn’t been taken into account in regional welfare planning over the years. In addition, the paper demonstrates empirically how the new advances in DEA analysis can be incorporated into different stages of regional planning investment and evaluation. In addition, the impact of external factors can be directly measured and evaluated accordingly.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Population density and regional welfare efficiency|
|Keywords:||Regional development; Welfare policies; Conditional DEA; Bootstrap techniques; Kernel density estimation|
|Subjects:||O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O18 - Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis ; Housing ; Infrastructure
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C0 - General > C02 - Mathematical Methods
P - Economic Systems > P2 - Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies > P25 - Urban, Rural, and Regional Economics
|Depositing User:||Nickolaos Tzeremes|
|Date Deposited:||11. Apr 2011 15:30|
|Last Modified:||17. May 2015 17:58|
 Caminal R. Personal redistribution and the regional allocation of public investment. Reg Sci Urban Econ 2004; 34: 55-69.
 Beer A, Forster C. 2002. Global restructuring, the welfare state and urban programmes: Federal policies and inequality within Australian cities. Eur Plan Stud 2002; 10: 7-25.
 Melachroinos KA, Spence N. Constructing a Manufacturing Fixed Capital Stock Series for the Regions of Greece. Eur Plan Stud 2000; 8: 43-67.
 Aschauer D. Is public expenditure productive? J Monetary Econ 1989; 23: 177–200.
 Karkazis J, Thanassoulis Emm. Assessing the effectiveness of regional development policies in Northern Greece using Data Envelopment Analysis. Soc Econ Plann Sci 1998; 32:123-137.
 Halkos GE, Tzeremes NG. Measuring regional economic efficiency: the case of Greek prefectures. Ann Reg Sci 2009; Doi: 10.1007/s00168-009-0287-6. (article in press).
 Carrera JA, Freire-Seren MJ, Manzano B. Macroeconomic effects of the regional allocation of public capital formation. Reg Sci Urban Econ 2009; 39: 563-574.
 Macmillan WD. The estimation and application of multi-regional economic planning models using Data Envelopment Analysis. Pap Reg Sci Assoc 1986; 60: 41–57.
 Zhu J. Multidimensional quality-of-life measure with an application to Fortune’s best cities. Soc Econ Plann Sci 2001; 35:263-284.
 Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes EL. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 1978; 2: 429-444.
 Siriopoulos C, Asteriou D. Testing for Convergence Across the Greek Regions. Reg Stud 1998; 32:537 – 546.  Tsionas EG. Another Look at Regional Convergence in Greece. Reg Stud 2002; 36: 603-609.
 Maudos J, Pastor JM, Serrano L. Efficiency and Productive Specialization: An Application to the Spanish Regions. Reg Stud 2000; 34: 829 – 842.
 Afonso A, Fernandes SP. Measuring local government spending efficiency: Evidence for the Lisbon region. Reg Stud 2006; 40: 39 – 53.
 Athanassopoulos AD, Karkazis J. The efficiency of social and economic image projection in spatial configurations. J Regional Sci 1997; 37:75-97.
 De Borger B, Kerstens K, Moesen W, Vanneste J. Explaining differences in productive efficiency: An application to Belgian municipalities. Public Choice 1994; 80: 339-358.
 All Media Database. Profile of Greek Regions. Available from: http://www.economics.gr. 2007, Accessed 13 Sept 2008.
 Boussofiane A, Dyson RG, Thanassoulis E. Applied Data Envelopment Analysis. Eur J Oper Res 1991; 52:1-15.  Ayres RU. Limits to the growth paradigm. Ecol Econ 1996; 19: 117-134.
 Friedly PH. Welfare indicators for public facility investments in urban renewal areas. Soc Econ Plann Sci 1969; 3: 291-314.
 Dyson RG, Allen R, Camanho AS, Podinovski VV, Sarrico CS, Shale E. Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. Eur J Oper Res 2001; 132: 245-259.
 Vogel BW, Coward RT. The Influence of Health and Health Care on Rural Economic Development. In: Beaulieu LJ, Mulkey D, editors. Investing in People: The Human Capital Needs of Rural America, Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 1995.
 Bryden J, Hart K. Dynamics of Rural Areas (DORA): The International Comparison. Arkleton Centre for Rural Development Research. Aberdeen: University of Aberdeen; 2001.
 Cloke P, Phillips M, Thrift N. The new middle classes and the social constructs of rural living. In: Butler T, Savage M, editors. Social change and the middle classes, London: UCL Press; 1995.
 Bramley G, Smart G. Rural Incomes and Housing Affordability, Salisbury, Wilts: Rural Development Commission; 1995.
 Perroux F. Economic space: Theory and application. Q J Econ 1950; 64:89-104.  Portnov BA, Erell E. Interregional inequalities in Israel, 1948–1995: divergence or convergence? Soc Econ Plann Sci 2004; 38: 255-289.
 Maeda H, Murakami S. Population’s urban environment evaluation model and its application. J Reg Sci 1985; 25: 273-290.
 Shephard RW. Theory of Cost and Production Function. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1970.
 Coelli T, Prasada J, Rao DS, Battese GE. An introduction to efficiency and production analysis. New York: Springer Science; 2005.
 Daraio C, Simar L. Advanced robust and nonparametric methods in efficiency analysis. New York: Springer Science; 2007.
 Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW. Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Manage Sci 1984; 30:1078– 1092.
 Adler N, Yazhemsky E, Tarverdyan R. A framework to measure the relative socio-economic performance of developing countries. Soc Econ Plann Sci 2010; 44: 73–88.
 Simar L, Wilson PW. Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: how to bootstrap in non parametric frontier models. Manage Sci 1998; 44: 49-61.
 Simar L, Wilson PW. A general methodology for bootstrapping in non-parametric frontier models. J Appl Stat 2000; 27:779 -802.
 Simar L, Wilson PW. Non parametric tests of return to scale. Eur J Oper Res 2002; 139:115-132.
 Daraio C, Simar L. Introducing environmental variables in nonparametric frontier models: A probabilistic approach. J Prod Anal 2005; 24: 93–121.
 Simar L, Wilson P. Statistical interference in nonparametric frontier models: recent developments and perspectives. In: Fried H, Lovell CAK, Schmidt S, editors. The measurement of productive efficiency and productivity change, New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.
 Silverman BW. Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. London: Chapman and Hall; 1986.
 Nadaraya EA. On estimating regression. Theor Probab Appl 1964; 9:141-142.
 Watson GS. Smooth regression analysis. Sankhya Ser A 1964; 26:359-372.
 Haveman RH. Evaluating the impact of public policies on regional welfare. Reg Stud 1976; 10: 449 – 463.
 Takahashi T. Spatial competition of governments in the investment on public facilities. Reg Sci Urban Econ 2004; 34: 455-488.
 Crihfield JB, McGuire TJ. Infrastructure, economic development and public policy. Reg Sci Urban Econ 1997; 27: 113-116.