Munich Personal RePEc Archive
Login | Create Account

Policy Rule Coefficients Driven by Latent Factors: Monetary and Fiscal Policy Interactions in an Endowment Economy

Gonzalez-Astudillo, Manuel (2011): Policy Rule Coefficients Driven by Latent Factors: Monetary and Fiscal Policy Interactions in an Endowment Economy. Unpublished.

This is the latest version of this item.

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
471Kb

Abstract

In this paper I formulate, solve and estimate an endowment version of a macroeconomic dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model with monetary and fiscal policy rules whose coefficients are time-varying and contemporaneously correlated. The aim of the paper is to identify from data the interactions between monetary and fiscal policies that have prevailed in the U.S. economy. The monetary authority uses a Taylor rule and the fiscal authority uses a rule in which taxes respond to lagged debt deviations. Policy rule coefficients are modeled as logistic functions of stationary correlated latent factors, introducing long-run interactions between monetary and fiscal policies. There are three main findings of the paper: First, monetary policy has reacted strongly to inflation deviations along, almost, the entire analyzed period, with a loose policy only during the periods 1979:1-1981:3 and 2008:4-2009:2. Second, regimes under which a determinacy condition is in place occur 54.25% of the time, while regimes with exploding local dynamics occur 45.34% of the time, and there is an association between the duration of these unstable regimes and the volatility of inflation. Third, tightening monetary policy in terms of increasing the reaction of the central bank with respect to inflation deviations, given the situation of the economy in the third quarter of 2010, implies an increase in inflation of the order of 3%.

Item Type:MPRA Paper
Language:English
Keywords:Time-varying policy rules, Monetary and fiscal policy interactions, Nonlinear state-space models.
Subjects:C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Econometric Methods: Multiple; Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables; Endogenous Regressors > C32 - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions
E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy Formation, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, Macroeconomic Policy, and General Outlook > E63 - Comparative or Joint Analysis of Fiscal and Monetary Policy; Stabilization
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods: General > C11 - Bayesian Analysis
ID Code:30119
Deposited By:Manuel González-Astudillo
Deposited On:07. Apr 2011 00:27
Last Modified:07. Apr 2011 00:27
References:

Ali, Mir M., N. N. Mikhail, and M. Safiul Haq (1978) ‘A class of bivariate distributions including the bivariate logistic.’ Journal of Multivariate Analysis 8(3), 405–412

Bernanke, Ben S. (2007) ‘Housing, housing finance, and monetary policy: a speech at the federal reserve bank of kansas city’s economic symposium, jackson hole, wyoming, august 31, 2007.’ Speech

Boivin, Jean (2006) ‘Has u.s. monetary policy changed? evidence from drifting coefficients and real-time data.’ Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 38(5), 1149–1173

Buti, Marco, Werner Roeger, and Jan In’t Veld (2001) ‘Stabilizing output and inflation: Policy conflicts and co-operation under a stability pact.’ Journal of Common Market Studies 39(5), 801–828

Chung, Hess, Troy Davig, and Eric Leeper (2007) ‘Monetary and fiscal policy switching.’ Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 39(4), 809–842

Clarida, Richard H., Jordi Gali, and Mark Gertler (2000) ‘Monetary policy rules and macroeconomic stability: Evidence and some theory.’ The Quarterly Journal of Economics 115(1), 147–180

Cochrane, John H. (2011) ‘Understanding policy in the great recession: Some unpleasant fiscal arithmetic.’ European Economic Review 55(1), 2–30

Cogley, Timothy, and Thomas Sargent (2002) ‘Evolving post-world war ii u.s. inflation dy- namics.’ In ‘NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2001, Volume 16’ (National Bureau of Eco- nomic Research, Inc) pp. 331–388

Conte, C., A.R. Karr, G. Clack, K.E. Hug, and United States. Department of State. Office of International Information Programs (Washington). (2001) Outline of the U.S. Economy (U.S. Department of State, Office of International Information Programs)

Davig, Troy, and Eric Leeper (2006) ‘Fluctuating macro policies and the fiscal theory.’ In ‘NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2006, Volume 21’ (National Bureau of Economic Re- search, Inc) pp. 247–316

-- (2007) ‘Generalizing the taylor principle.’ American Economic Review 97(3), 607–635

-- (2008) ‘Endogenous monetary policy regime change.’ In ‘NBER International Seminar on Macroeconomics 2006’ (National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc) pp. 345–391

Davig, Troy, and Taeyoung Doh (2009) ‘Monetary policy regime shifts and inflation persis- tence.’ Research Working Paper RWP 08-16, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City

Davig, Troy, Eric M. Leeper, and Todd B. Walker (2011) ‘Inflation and the fiscal limit.’ European Economic Review 55(1), 31–47. Special Issue on Monetary and Fiscal Interactions in Times of Economic Stress

Dixit, Avinash Kamalakar, and Luisa Lambertini (2003) ‘Interactions of commitment and discretion in monetary and fiscal policies.’ American Economic Review 93(5), 1522–1542

Dolado, Juan J., Ramn Maria-Dolores, and Manuel Naveira (2005) ‘Are monetary-policy reaction functions asymmetric?: The role of nonlinearity in the phillips curve.’ European Economic Review 49(2), 485–503

Farmer, Roger E. A., Daniel F. Waggoner, and Tao Zha (2009) ‘Understanding markov- switching rational expectations models.’ Journal of Economic Theory 144(5), 1849–1867

Favero, Carlo, and Tommaso Monacelli (2003) ‘Monetary-fiscal mix and inflation performance: Evidence from the u.s.’ Working Papers 234, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Insti- tute for Economic Research), Bocconi University

Fernandez-Villaverde, Jesus, and Juan F Rubio-Ramirez (2010) ‘Macroeconomics and volatility: Data, models, and estimation.’ NBER Working Papers 16618, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc

Fernandez-Villaverde, Jesus, Pablo A. Guerron, and Juan F Rubio-Ramirez (2010) ‘Fortune or virtue: Time-variant volatilities versus parameter drifting in u.s. data.’ NBER Working Papers 15928, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc

Geweke, John (1991) ‘Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to the calculation of posterior moments.’ Staff Report 148, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis

Geweke, John, and Hisashi Tanizaki (2001) ‘Bayesian estimation of state-space models using the metropolis-hastings algorithm within gibbs sampling.’ Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 37(2), 151–170

Hanson, Michael Steven (2004) ‘The ”price puzzle” reconsidered.’ Journal of Monetary Economics 51(7), 1385–1413

Kim, Chang-Jin, and Charles R. Nelson (2006) ‘Estimation of a forward-looking monetary policy rule: A time-varying parameter model using ex post data.’ Journal of Monetary Economics 53(8), 1949–1966

Leeper, Eric (1991) ‘Equilibria under ’active’ and ’passive’ monetary and fiscal policies.’ Journal of Monetary Economics 27(1), 129–147

-- (2010) ‘Monetary science, fiscal alchemy.’ NBER Working Papers 16510, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc

Leith, Campbell, and Simon Wren-Lewis (2000) ‘Interactions between monetary and fiscal policy rules.’ Economic Journal 110(462), C93–108

Lubik, Thomas, and Frank Schorfheide (2004) ‘Testing for indeterminacy: An Application to US Monetary Policy.’ The American Economic Review 94(1), 190–217

Maragakis, P., F. Ritort, C. Bustamante, M. Karplus, and G.E. Crooks (2008) ‘Bayesian estimates of free energies from nonequilibrium work data in the presence of instrument noise.’ The Journal of chemical physics 129, 1–8

May, Ann Mari (1990) ‘President eisenhower, economic policy, and the 1960 presidential election.’ The Journal of Economic History 50(02), 417–427

McCallum, Bennett (1983) ‘On non-uniqueness in rational expectations models: An attempt at perspective.’ Journal of Monetary Economics 11(2), 139–168

Muscatelli, Vito Antonio, Patrizio Tirelli, and Carmine Trecroci (2004) ‘Fiscal and monetary policy interactions: Empirical evidence and optimal policy using a structural new- keynesian model.’ Journal of Macroeconomics 26(2), 257–280

Nelson, E. (2007) ‘Milton Friedman and US Monetary History.’ Federal Reserve Bank of Sf. Louis Review 89(3), 153–82

Nordhaus, William D. (1994) ‘Policy games: Coordination and independece in monetary and fiscal policies.’ Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 25(1994-2), 139–216

Park, J.Y. (2002) ‘Nonstationary nonlinear heteroskedasticity.’ Journal of econometrics 110(2), 383–415

Primiceri, Giorgio (2005) ‘Time varying structural vector autoregressions and monetary policy.’ Review of Economic Studies 72(3), 821–852

Reis, Ricardo (2010) ‘Interpreting the unconventional u.s. monetary policy of 2007-09.’ NBER Working Papers 15662, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc

Romer, Christina Duckworth, and David Romer (2002) ‘A rehabilitation of monetary policy in the 1950’s.’ American Economic Review 92(2), 121–127

Sims, Christopher (1992) ‘Interpreting the macroeconomic time series facts: The effects of monetary policy.’ European Economic Review 36(5), 975–1000

-- (1994) ‘A simple model for study of the determination of the price level and the interaction of monetary and fiscal policy.’ Economic Theory 4(3), 381–99

Svensson, Lars E.O., and Noah Williams (2007) ‘Monetary policy with model uncertainty: Distribution forecast targeting.’ CEPR Discussion Papers 6331, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers

Taylor, John B. (1993) ‘Discretion versus policy rules in practice.’ Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 39(1), 195–214

Woodford, Michael (1995) ‘Price level determinacy without control of a monetary aggregate.’ NBER Working Papers 5204, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc

Available Versions of this Item

Repository Staff Only: item control page

LMU-Logo
MPRA is a RePEc service hosted by
the Munich University Library in Germany.