Parrinello, Sergio (2000): The "institutional factor" in the theory of international trade: new vs. old trade theories. Published in: Edward Elgar Publ. (2002): pp. 256-272.
Download (102kB) | Preview
Abstract The New Trade Theory presents novel perspectives compared to the Old Theories of international trade. Increasing returns and different institutional arrangements can explain the international specialization and trade flows even between countries which are identical in terms of factor endowments, technology and preferences for private goods. In this context the pattern of trade cannot be determined by a price/cost comparison of isolated countries. Comparative advantages can be affected by historical accidents and become a solution to a general political-economic equilibrium system. As a consequence, the institutional factor appears as a crucial element in a non purely verbal distinction between theories of interregional trade and theories of international trade. This distinction is acknowledged in the non analytical discourse of the Old Trade Theories, but it is seldom revealed in the formal models by which such theories are formulated. The New Trade Theory has the merit of dealing with this hidden factor explicitly. This paper presents 1) a reappraisal of some ideas of Smith, Ricardo and Ohlin which anticipate the role assigned to the institutional factor in the New Theory; 2) a critical assessment of how this factor is modeled in the New Trade Theory 3) an evaluation of the progress brought about by the New Trade Theory; 4) an indication of how the same factor can be treated in the light of the Old Trade Theories.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||The "institutional factor" in the theory of international trade: new vs. old trade theories|
|Keywords:||Trade theories; National competitiveness; Cambridge Economists;|
|Subjects:||F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F15 - Economic Integration
F - International Economics > F0 - General > F01 - Global Outlook
B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B50 - General
|Depositing User:||Sergio Parrinello|
|Date Deposited:||12. Jun 2011 20:53|
|Last Modified:||25. May 2015 21:43|
Akerlof, G. (1976), ‘The Economics of Caste and the Rat Race and Other Woeful Tales’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90, 599-617.
Basu, K., E. Jones and E. Schlicht (1987), ‘The Growth and Decay of Custom: the Role of the New Institutional Economics in Economic History’, Explorations in Economic History, 24, 1-21.
Bhagwati, Jagdish and Robert E. Hudec (eds.) (1996), Fair Trade and Harmonization, Prerequisites for Free Trade, Vol. I, Cambridge, Mass..
Blaug, Mark (1992), The Methodology of Economics: or How Economists Explain, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brecher, R. (1974), ‘Minimum Wage Rates and the Pure Theory of International Trade’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 88 (1), 98-116.
Casella, Alessandra (1996) ‘Free Trade and Evolving Standards’ in Jagdish Bhagwati and Robert E. Hudec (eds.), Fair Trade and Harmonization, Prerequisites for Free Trade, Vol. I, Cambridge, Mass.
Casella Alessandra and Jonathan S. Feinstein (1990), Public Goods in Trade: on the Formation of Markets and Political Jurisditions, NBER working paper n. 3554.
Clarida Richard H. and Ronald Findlay (1991), Endogenous Comparative Advantage, Government, and the Pattern of Trade, NBER working paper n.3813.
Deardorff, A. (1980),‘The General Validity of the Law of Comparative Advantage’, Journal of Political Economy, (88), 5, 941-957.
Emmanuel, A. (1969), L'Echange Inégal, Librairie François Maspero, Paris; English edition (1972), Unequal Exchange, B. Pearce, Monthly Review Press.
Field, A.J. (1981), ‘The Problem with Neoclassical Institutional Economics: a Critique with Special Reference to the North/Thomas Model of Pre-1500 Europe’, Explorations in Economic History, 18, 174-198.
Field, A. J. (1991), ‘ Do Legal Systems Matter ?’ , Explorations in Economic History, 28, 1-35. Grossman, Gene and Elhanan Helpman (1991), Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, Cambridge, Mass..
Krugman, Paul (1995), ‘Increasing Returns, Imperfect Competition and the Positive Theory of International Trade’ in Gene M. Grossman and Kenneth Rogoff (eds), Handbook of International Economics, vol. III.
Helpman, Elhanan and Paul R. Krugman (1986), Market Strucure and Foreign Trade (Increasing returns, imperfect competition, and the international economy), Cambridge, Mass.. Jones, Ronald (1971) ‘A Three Factor Model in Theory, Trade and History’ in J. Bhagwati et al. (eds.), Trade, Balance of Payments, and Growth: Essays in Honor of Charles Kindleberger, North Holland.
Jones, R. W. and J. Scheinkman (1977), ‘The Relevance of the Two-Sector Production Model in Trade Theory’, Journal of Political Economy, (85), 5, 909-935.
Ethier, Wilfred (1984), ‘Higher Dimensional Issues in Trade Theory’, in Ronald Jones and Peter Kenen (eds), Handbook of International Economics, vol. I , Elsevier Sc. Publ.
Kindleberger, Charles P.(1978), ‘Government and International Trade’, Essays in International Finance, n.129, July.
Kindleberger, Charles P. (1983), ‘Standards as Public, Collective and Private Goods’, Kyklos, (36), 3, 377-396.
Krugman, Paul R. (ed.) (1986), Strategic Trade Policy and the New International Economics, Cambridge, MIT Press.
Krugman, Paul R. (1990), Rethinking International Trade, Cambridge, Mass..
Krugman, Paul R. (1991), Geography and Trade, Leuven University Press and Cambridge Mass.. Lancaster, K. (1980), ‘Intra-industry Trade under Perfect Monopolistic Competition’, Journal of International Economics, (10) 2, 151-75.
Lindbeck, A. (1976), ‘Stabilization Policy in Open Economies with Endogenous Politicians’, American Economic Review, 66, May, 1-19.
Lovasy, G. (1941),‘International Trade under Imperfect Competition’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 55, August: 346-56.
Meardon, Stephen (2000), On the Progress of the New Economic Geography, paper delivered at the European Society for the History of Economic Thought, Graz, February 24-27.
Metcalfe, Stan and Ian Steedman (1981), ‘On the Transformation of Theorems’, Journal of International Economics, 11: 267-271.
Myrdal, Gunnar (1957), Economic Theory and Underdeveloped Regions , London, Duckworth.
Negishi, Takashi (1985), Economic Theories in a non-Walrasian Tradition, Cambridge University Press. Negishi, Takashi (1989), History of Economic Theory, North Holland.
North, Douglas and R.O. Thomas (1973), The Rise of the Western World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
North, Douglas (1979), ‘A Framework for Analyzing the State in Economic History’, Explorations in Economic History, 16, 249-259. Ohlin, Bertil (1933), Interregional and International Trade, Cambridge, MA: Harvard, revised edtion (1968), Harvard University.
Ohlin, B. (1979), ‘ Some Insufficiencies in the Theories of International Economic Relations, Essays in International Finance, n. 134. Princeton: Princeton University, Department of Economics.
Parrinello, S. (1970), ‘Introduzione ad una Teoria Neoricardiana del Comercio Internazionale’, Studi Economici, 267-321.
Parrinello, S. (1988a), ‘'On Foreign Trade' and the Ricardian Model of Trade’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, (10) 4, 585-601.
Parrinello, S.( 1988b), Costi Comparati e Norme Sociali, mimeo, Società Italiana degli Economisti, Rome, 28 October 1988.
Parrinello, S. (1999), ‘Explaining and Understanding Economic Events by Contrasting Alternatives’, Metroeconomica, 50, 325-350.
Posner, R. A. (1972), Economic Analysis of Law, Boston: Little Brown.
Schumpeter, J. (1961), Theory of Economic Development.
Smith, Alasdair (1984), ‘Capital Theory and Trade Theory’, in Ronald Jones and Peter Kenen (eds), Handbook of International Economics, vol. I , Elsevier Sc. Publ..
Steedman I. and J.S. Metcalfe (1972), 'Reswitching and Primary Input Use', Economic Journal, 82, 140-157.
Steedman, Ian (ed.) (1979), Fundamental Issues in Trade Theory, London: MacMillan.