Pivato, Marcus (2011): Variablepopulation voting rules.

PDF
MPRA_paper_31896.pdf Download (582kB)  Preview 
Abstract
Let X be a set of social alternatives, and let V be a set of `votes' or `signals'. (We do not assume any structure on X or V). A `variable population voting rule' F takes any number of anonymous votes drawn from V as input, and produces a nonempty subset of X as output. The rule F satisfies `reinforcement' if, whenever two disjoint sets of voters independently select some subset Y of X, the union of these two sets will also select Y. We show that F satisfies reinforcement if and only if F is a `balance rule'. If F satisfies a form of neutrality, then F is satisfies reinforcement if and only if F is a scoring rule (with scores taking values in an abstract linearly ordered abelian group R); this generalizes a result of Myerson (1995). We also discuss the sense in which the balance or scoring representation of F is unique. Finally, we provide a characterization of two scoring rules: `formally utilitarian' voting and `range voting'. a
Item Type:  MPRA Paper 

Original Title:  Variablepopulation voting rules 
Language:  English 
Keywords:  reinforcement; scoring rule; balance rule; linearly ordered abelian group; formal utilitarian; range voting 
Subjects:  D  Microeconomics > D7  Analysis of Collective DecisionMaking > D71  Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations 
Item ID:  31896 
Depositing User:  Marcus Pivato 
Date Deposited:  29. Jun 2011 03:09 
Last Modified:  15. Feb 2013 14:45 
References:  AlosFerrer, C., 2006. A simple characterization of approval voting. Soc. Choice Welf. 27 (3), 621625. Brams, S. J., Fishburn, P. C., 1983. Approval voting. Birkhauser Boston, Mass. Ching, S., 1996. A simple characterization of plurality rule. J. Econom. Theory 71 (1), 298302. Dhillon, A., 1998. Extended Pareto rules and relative utilitarianism. Soc. Choice Welf. 15 (4), 521542. Dhillon, A., Mertens, J.F., 1999. Relative utilitarianism. Econometrica 67 (3), 471498. Dummit, D. S., Foote, R. M., 2004. Abstract algebra, 3rd Edition. John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken, NJ. Fishburn, P. C., 1978. Axioms for approval voting: direct proof. J. Econom. Theory 19 (1), 180185. Gaertner, W., Xu, Y., 2011. A general scoring rule. (preprint). Hausner, M., Wendel, J. G., 1952. Ordered vector spaces. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 3, 977982. Morkelyunas, A., 1981. On the choice from collections of sets. Mat. Metody v Sotsial. Nauk.Trudy Sem. Protsessy Optimal. Upravleniya (14), 3349, 93. Morkelyunas, A., 1982. Two choice rules similar to the plurality and Borda's rule. Mat. Metody v Sotsial. Nauk. (15), 2736. Myerson, R. B., 1995. Axiomatic derivation of scoring rules without the ordering assumption. Soc. Choice Welf. 12 (1), 5974. Nitzan, S., Rubinstein, A., 1981. A further characterization of Borda ranking method. Public Choice 36, 153158. Pivato, M., 2011. Additive representation of separable preferences over infinite products. (preprint). Richelson, J. T., 1978. A characterization result for the plurality rule. J. Econom. Theory 19 (2), 548550. Smith, J. H., 1973. Aggregation of preferences with variable electorate. Econometrica 41, 10271041. Smith,W. D., November 2000. Range voting, http://www.math.temple.edu/~wds/homepage/rangevote.pdf. Yeh, C.H., 2008. An efficiency characterization of plurality rule in collective choice problems. Econom. Theory 34 (3), 575583. Young, H. P., 1974a. An axiomatization of Borda’s rule. J. Econom. Theory 9 (1), 4352. Young, H. P., 1974b. A note on preference aggregation. Econometrica 42, 11291131. Young, H. P., 1975. Social choice scoring functions. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 28, 824838. Young, H. P., Levenglick, A., 1978. A consistent extension of Condorcet's election principle. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 35 (2), 285300. Zwicker, W. S., 2008. Consistency without neutrality in voting rules: When is a vote an average? Math. Comput. Modelling 48 (910), 13571373. 
URI:  http://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/id/eprint/31896 