Pfau, Wade Donald (2011): Getting on Track for a Sustainable Retirement: A Reality Check on Savings and Work.
Download (310Kb) | Preview
The aim of traditional retirement planning is to set a wealth accumulation target for your retirement date so that your desired expenditures can be obtained using a “safe” withdrawal rate. But it is quite difficult to know if you are making progress toward this target. Volatility over short periods of time strongly limits the usefulness of using your current wealth accumulation at ten or even five years before retirement to predict your final retirement wealth. Fortunately, it is not necessary to focus on a retirement wealth accumulation target. The accumulation and retirement phases should not be treated separately in this way. This paper outlines a framework for considering if someone in mid-career is on track for a sustainable retirement. It investigates what combinations of savings rates and years of continued work would have allowed someone to have always accumulated enough by retirement to afford one’s desired retirement expenditures in all of the rolling periods from the historical data. A strategy is “safe” if it worked in the worst-case offered thus far by history. I consider a 55 year old as a case study to show what savings rate will be needed to retire 10 years later, or how much longer one should work with a variety of other savings rates. Results are shown for a wide variety of situations. These findings can potentially serve as a reality check about the sustainability of one’s retirement plans.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Getting on Track for a Sustainable Retirement: A Reality Check on Savings and Work|
|Keywords:||retirement planning; lifetime perspective; safe savings rate; safe retirement age; wealth accumulation targets; retirement spending goals; safe withdrawal rates|
|Subjects:||G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G11 - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
N - Economic History > N2 - Financial Markets and Institutions > N22 - U.S.; Canada: 1913-
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C15 - Statistical Simulation Methods: General
N - Economic History > N2 - Financial Markets and Institutions > N21 - U.S.; Canada: Pre-1913
D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D14 - Personal Finance
|Depositing User:||Wade D. Pfau|
|Date Deposited:||29. Jun 2011 07:08|
|Last Modified:||11. Feb 2013 23:27|
Basu, Anup K., and Michael E. Drew. 2009. “Portfolio Size Effect in Retirement Accounts: What Does It Imply for Lifecycle Asset Allocation Funds?” Journal of Portfolio Management 35, 3 (Spring): 61-72.
Kitces, Michael E. 2010. "Is ‘Save For Decades, Then Quickly Double Your Money And Retire’ Your (Unintentional) Retirement Advice!?" (November) Available from http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/76-Is-Save-For-Decades,-Then-Quickly-Double-Your-Money-And-Retire-Your-Unintentional-Retirement-Advice!.html
Pfau, Wade D. 2011a. "The Portfolio Size Effect and Lifecycle Asset Allocation Funds: A Different Perspective." Journal of Portfolio Management 37, 3 (Spring): 44-53.
Pfau, Wade D. 2011b. “Safe Savings Rates: A New Approach to Retirement Planning over the Life Cycle.” Journal of Financial Planning 24, 5 (May): 42-50.
Pfau, Wade D. 2011c. “Getting on Track for Retirement” (June) Available from http://wpfau.blogspot.com/2011/06/getting-on-track-for-retirement.html
Pfau, Wade D. 2011d. “Can We Predict the Sustainable Withdrawal Rate for New Retirees?” Journal of Financial Planning 24, 8 (August): forthcoming.
Shiller, Robert J. 2005. “Life-Cycle Portfolios as Government Policy.” The Economists Voice 2, 1: 1-8.