HYE, Qazi Muhammad Adnan and M Anwar, Jalil (2010): Revenue and Expenditure Nexus: A Case Study of Romania. Published in: Romanian Journal of Fiscal Policy , Vol. Volume, No. Issue 1 : pp. 22-28.
Download (133kB) | Preview
This study determines the causal relationship between the expenditure and revenue of government in the case of Romania by using the autoregressive distributive lag approach to cointegration, variance decomposition and rolling regression method. The results indicate that bidirectional long run relationship exist between expenditure and revenue of government. The variance decomposition method suggests government revenue shock has more sharply impact on the government expenditure as compared to the shock in government expenditure and response of government revenue collection.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Revenue and Expenditure Nexus: A Case Study of Romania|
|Keywords:||Government revenue, government expenditure, cointegration|
|Subjects:||C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models; Single Variables > C22 - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models|
|Depositing User:||M Anwar Jalil|
|Date Deposited:||10. Jul 2011 16:38|
|Last Modified:||13. Feb 2013 04:16|
Chen, S.W., 2008.Untangling the web of causalities among four disaggregate government expenditures, government revenue and output in Taiwan. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, Vol.6, No.1, pp: 99–107.
Eita, J. H; Mbazima, D., 2008. The Causal Relationship Between Government Revenue and Expenditure in Namibia. MPRA Paper No. 9154, posted 16, 26 May 2008.
Gil-Alana, L.A ., 2009. Government Expenditures and Revenues: Evidence of Fractional Cointegration in an Asymmetric Modeling. Int Adv Econ Res, Vol.15, pp:143–155.
Gaiha, R., 2002. Government Expenditures and Revenues: Evidence of Fractional Cointegration in an Asymmetric Modeling. Economics of Planning, Vol.35, pp: 221–252, 2002.
Jao, C.C ., 2000. The Impact Of Tax Revenue And Social Welfare Expenditure On Income Distribution Taiwan”. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Vol.5, No.1, pp: 73 — 90.
Xiaoming, Li., 2001. Government revenue, government expenditure, and temporal causality: evidence from China. Applied Economics, Vol.33, pp: 485-497.
Narayan, P.K; Narayan, S., 2006. Government revenue and government expenditure nexus: evidence from developing countries, Applied Economics, Vol. 38, pp: 285–291.
Pesaran, M. H.; Shin, Y.; Smith, R.J., 2001. Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships”. Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol, 16, No.3, pp-289-326.
Payne, J. E; Mohammadi, H.; Cak, M., 2008. Turkish budget deficit sustainability and the revenue-expenditure nexus. Applied Economics, Vol.40, pp: 823–830.
Stallmanna, J.I.; Deller, S ., 2010. Impacts of local and state tax and expenditure limits on economic growth. Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 17, pp: 645–648.
Stoian, A., 2008. Analyzing Causality between Romania’s Public Budget Expenditures and Revenues. Theoretical and Applied Economics. Vol. 11, No.528.
Yan, C.; Gong, L., 2009. Government expenditure, taxation and long-run growth, Front. Econ. Vol.4, No.4, pp: 505–525.
Zapf, M. ; Payne, J. E., 2009. Asymmetric modeling of the revenue-expenditure nexus: evidence from aggregate state and local government in the US. Applied Economics Letters, Vol.16, pp: 871–876.