José Carlos R., Alcantud and Rocío, de Andrés and José Manuel, Cascón (2011): Measurement of consensus with a reference.
Download (325kB) | Preview
In this work we contribute to the formal analysis of the measurement of consensus in a society. Instead of approaching the topic from an absolute perspective we are concerned with a practical application: the proposal of a decision mechanism with respect to which consensus is measured. Surprisingly this produces a powerful unifying model, a restriction of which is deeply analysed. We also study the axiomatic properties of particular expressions for consensus with various salient social rules as a reference.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Measurement of consensus with a reference|
|Keywords:||Consensus; coherence; measurement; Borda rule; Copeland rule|
|Subjects:||D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D71 - Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations|
|Depositing User:||Jose Carlos R. Alcantud|
|Date Deposited:||11. Jul 2011 15:55|
|Last Modified:||21. Feb 2013 01:54|
J. Alcalde and M. Vorsatz. On the measurement of consensus. Mimeo, 2008.
J. Alcalde and M. Vorsatz. Do we agree? measuring the cohesiveness of preferences. Mimeo, 2010.
P. Allison. Measures of inequality. American Sociological Review, 43:865–880, 1978.
R. Bosch. Characterizations of Voting Rules and Consensus Measures. PhD thesis, Tilburg University, 2005.
T. Meskanen and H.Nurmi. Mathematics and Democracy, chapter Distance from consensus: A theme and variations, pages 117–132. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg, 2006.
G. Pritchard and Mark C. Wilson. Exact results on manipulability of positional voting rules. Social Choice and Welfare, 29:487–513, 2007.
D. G. Saari. Susceptibility to manipulation. Public Choice, 64:21–41, 1990.
D. G. Saari and V. R. Merlin. The Copeland method I: Relationships and the dictionary. Economic Theory, 8:51–76, 1996.
K. Suzumura. Rational Choice, Collective Decisions and Social Welfare. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983.