Munich Personal RePEc Archive
Login | Create Account

Neo-liberalism, consequences on the prospect of democratization in Latin America

Dobra, Alexandra (2010): Neo-liberalism, consequences on the prospect of democratization in Latin America. Published in: A Different View : The IAPSS Monthly News Magazine , Vol. 6, No. 36 (October 2010): pp. 28-38.

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
182Kb

Abstract

The present paper aims to analyze the consequences of neo-liberalism on the prospect of democratization in Latin America, by concentrating on two case-studies, Brazil and Chile. The analysis is done on a double level. In a first part it considers the consequences of neo-liberalism on the first dimension of the infra-State level, the State itself and the government. In a second part it moves to the analysis of the second dimension of the infra-State level, the society. This double level of evaluation highlights the deficiency of an efficacious political democratization at the level of the State and the lack of the application of civil rights at the level of society. The neo-liberal context has accentuated democratic lacunas, because it has been ineffective in providing monitoring capacities in the field of democratic norms and institutional implementation.

Item Type:MPRA Paper
Language:English
Keywords:Neo-liberalism; Latin America; Democratization; Democratic deconsolidation; Depolitization; Public sphere
Subjects:J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J0 - General > J08 - Labor Economics Policies
A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A13 - Relation of Economics to Social Values
I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare and Poverty > I38 - Government Policy; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs
A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A11 - Role of Economics; Role of Economists; Market for Economists
ID Code:32442
Deposited By:Alexandra Dobra
Deposited On:27. Jul 2011 18:58
Last Modified:27. Jul 2011 18:58
References:

Bulmer-Thomas, V., (1996). The New Economic Model in Latin America and its Impact on Income Distribution and Poverty. Basingstoke, Macmillan.

Diamond, L., (1994). Rethinking civil society: toward democratic consolidation. Journal of Democracy 5.

Dominguez, J., I. (1997). Technopols : freeing politics and markets in Latin America. Journal of Democracy 9 (4)

Economic Commission for Latin America and the Carribean, (2004). Social panorama of Latin America.

International Labour Organization, (2004). Panorama Laborae 2004: America Latina y el Caribe.

Haagh, L., (2002). Citizenship, labour markets and democratization: Chile and the modern sequence. London: Palgrave.

Hayek, F. (1982). Los principios del orden social liberal, Revista Estudios Públicos 6 (1).

Huntington, S., P.; Crozier, M.; Watanuki, J. (1975). The Crisis of Democracy: Report on the Governability of Democracies to the Trilateral Commission. New York: New York University Press.

Loveman, B., (1991). Mision cumplida ? Civil-military relations and the Chilean political transition. Journal of lnteramerican Studies and World Affairs 33 (3).74.

Mann, M., (1986). The sources of social power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nef, G., (2003). The Chilean Model: Fact and Fiction. Latin American Perspectives 30 (5).

Nietzsche, F., (1985). Ainsi parlait Zarahustra. Paris: Gallimard, Folio.

O'Donnell, G., (1994). Delegative Democracy, Journal of Democracy.

Oxhorn, P., D. (1998). What kind of democracy? What kind of market? Latin America in the age of neoliberalism. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

Power, T., J., (1991). Politicized democracy, competition, institutions, and 'civic fatigue' in Brazil. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 33 (3).

Schneider, D. J. (1991). Social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 42.

Smith, W., C. (1990). Democracy, distributional conflicts and macroeconomic policymaking in Argentina, Journal of lnteramerican Studies and World Affairs 32 (2).

Smith, W., C. (1991). State, market and neoliberalism in post-transition Argentina. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 33 (4).

Stokes, C., (2007).Political Clientelism. Handbook of Comparative Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sylva, P. (2004). Doing politics in a depoliticized society: social change and political deactivation in Chile. Bulletin of Latin American Research 23 (1).

Weffort, F., C., (1992). New Democracies, Which Democracies ?, Washington, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, The Latin American Program, 198.

Weyland, K., (2004). Democracy and the new market model in Latin America. Latin American Politics & Society 46 (1).

All papers reproduced by permission. Reproduction and distribution subject to the approval of the copyright owners.
Repository Staff Only: item control page

LMU-Logo
MPRA is a RePEc service hosted by
the Munich University Library in Germany.