Stachtiaris, Spiros and Drichoutis, Andreas and Klonaris, Stathis (2011): Preference reversals in contingent and inferred valuation methods.
This is the latest version of this item.
Download (157kB) | Preview
We examine inconsistencies in preference orderings (Alevy et al. 2011) using the Contingent valuation (CV) as well as the Inferred valuation (IV) method (Lusk and Norwood 2009a,b). We find that when moving in the context of a food market we only observe weak effects of inconsistencies. In addition, we find that the IV method is more susceptible to inconsistent preference orderings than the CV method. We also find that the IV method generates higher valuations than CV in case of consumers with high commitment costs but successfully mitigates social desirability bias in case of low commitment costs and high normative motivations.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Preference reversals in contingent and inferred valuation methods|
|Keywords:||willingness-to-pay (WTP), Contingent Valuation (CV), Inferred Valuation(IV), preference reversals|
|Subjects:||D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D12 - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C90 - General
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q51 - Valuation of Environmental Effects
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C93 - Field Experiments
|Depositing User:||Andreas Drichoutis|
|Date Deposited:||15. Aug 2011 03:34|
|Last Modified:||11. Mar 2015 17:00|
Alevy, J.E.; J. List and W. Adamowicz. 2011. "How Can Behavioral Economics Inform Non-Market Valuation;an Example from the Preference Reversal Literature." Land Economics, 87(3), 365-381.
Blaine, T.W.; F.R. Lichtkoppler; K.R. Jones and R.H. Zondag. 2005. "An Assessment of Household Willingness to Pay for Curbside Recycling: A Comparison of Payment Card and Referendum Approaches." Journal of Environmental Management, 76(1), 15-22.
Caswell, Julie A. and E. M. Modjuzska. 1996. "Using Informational Labeling to Influence the Market for Quality in Food Products." American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78 1248-1253.
Crowne, D. P. and D Marlowe. 1960. "A New Scale of Social Desirability Independent of Psychopathalogy." Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24(4), 349-50.
Darby, M. and E. Karni. 1973. "Free Competition and Optimal Amount of Fraud." Journal of Law and Economics, 16, 67-88.
Drichoutis, Andreas C.; Panagiotis Lazaridis and Rodolfo M. Nayga, Jr. 2009. "On Consumers' Valuation of Nutrition Information." Bulletin of Economic Research, 61(3), 223-247.
Fisher, R. J. . 1993. "Social Desirability Bias and the Validity of Indirect Questioning." Journal of Consumer Research, 20(2), 303-15.
Grether, D. M. and C. R. Plott. 1979. "Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon." American Economic Review, 69(4), 623-38.
Hsee, C. K.; G. F. Loewenstein; Sally Blount and Max H. Bazerman. 1999. "Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Options: A Review and Theoretical Analysis." Psychological Bulletin, 125, 576-591.
Hsee, C.K. 1996. "The Evaluability Hypothesis: An Explanation for Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Alternatives." Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46, 247-57.
Johnson, Eric J.; Mary Steffel and Daniel G. Goldstein. 2005. "Making Better Decisions: From Measuring to Constructing Preferences." Health Psychology, 24(4), S17–S22.
Leggett, C. G.; N. S. Kleckner; K. J. Boyle; J. W. Duffield and R. C. Mitchell. 2003. "Social Desirability Bias in Contingent Valuation Surveys Administered through in-Person Interviews." Land Economics, 79(4), 561-75.
Lichtenstein, S. and P. Slovic. 2006. The Construction of Preference. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. List, J.; R. Berrens; A. Bohara and J. Kerkvliet. 2004. "Examining the Role of Social Isolation on Stated Preferences." American Economic Review, 94(3), 741-752.
List, J.A. 2002. "Preference Reversals of a Different Kind: The “More Is Less” Phenomenon." American Economic Review, 92(5), 1636-1643.
List, J.A. 2002. "Preference Reversals of a Different Kind:The “More Is Less” Phenomenon." The American Economic Review, 92(5), 1636-1643.
Lusk, J. and F. B. Norwood. 2009b. "An Inferred Valuation Method." Land Economics, 85(3), 500-514.
Lusk, JaysonL. and F. Bailey Norwood. 2009a. "Bridging the Gap between Laboratory Experiments and Naturally Occurring Markets:An Inferred Valuation Method." Journal of Environmental Economic and Management, 58, 236-50.
Payne, John W.; James R. Bettman and David A. Schkade. 1999. "Measuring Constructed Preferences: Towards a Building Code." Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19(1), 243-270.
Plant, E. A.; P. G. Devine and P. C Brazy. 2003. "The Bogus Pipeline and Motivations to Respond without Prejudice: Revisiting the Fading and Faking of Racial Prejudice." Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6 (2), 187-200.
Reaves, D.W.; R.A. Kramer and T.P. Holmes. 1999. "Does Question Format Matter? Valuing an Endangered Species." Environmental and Resource Economics 14(3), 365-83.
Rowe, R.D.; W.D. Schulze and Breffle. 1996. "A Test for Payment Card Biases." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 31, 178-85.
Seidl, Christian. 2002. "Preference Reversal." Journal of Economic Surveys, 16(5), 621-655.
Slovic, P. and S. Lichtenstein. 1968. "Preference-Reversals: A Broader Perspective." American Economic Review, 73(4), 596-605.
Slovic, Paul. 1995. "The Construction of Preference." American Psychologist, 50(5), 364-371.
Slovic, Paul and Sarah Lichtenstein. 1983. "Preference-Reversals: A Broader Perspective." American Economic Review, 73(4), 596-605.
Zhongmin, X.; J. Loomis; Z. Zhiqiang and K. Hamamura. 2006. "Evaluating the Performance of Different Willingness to Pay Question Formats for Valuing Environmental Restoration in Rural China." Environment and Development Economics, 11, 585-601.
Available Versions of this Item
The “more is less” phenomenon in Contingent and Inferred valuation. (deposited 11. Mar 2011 00:18)
- Preference reversals in contingent and inferred valuation methods. (deposited 15. Aug 2011 03:34) [Currently Displayed]