Shingal, ANIRUDH (2011): Foreign market access in government procurement.
Download (282Kb) | Preview
Governments are known to prefer domestic over foreign suppliers in the award of procurement contracts despite cost and quality considerations. Literature exploring this “home-bias” in public purchases has exclusively focused on the microeconomic interplay between the tendering entity and the bidding firms. There are, however, other factors that influence governments’ buying decisions. Using self-assembled and hitherto unexplored data on government procurement submitted by Japan and Switzerland to the WTO, we study the determinants of foreign public procurement over the period 1990-2003. In doing so, we make a threefold contribution to this literature. One, we examine the effect of macroeconomic, political economy, procurement-specific and domestic policy factors that influence governments’ sourcing decisions. Two, we provide for an empirical test of Baldwin's (1970, 1984) "neutrality proposition" after controlling for other factors. Three, we test empirically whether the WTO's Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA) has been successful in increasing foreign market access. Our results suggest the importance of the magnitude of procurement demand and of the average contract size awarded to foreign suppliers in these governments' purchases from abroad. While the impacts of domestic firm competitiveness attributes, political budget cycles and Keynesian macroeconomic compulsions depend on the econometric specification used, we find that Baldwin's "neutrality proposition" does not hold for the public purchase pattern of either country. Moreover, membership of the GPA is not found to increase the value of foreign procurement in either country, though it seems to increase the import demand for contracts.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Foreign market access in government procurement|
|Keywords:||Government procurement, home-bias, GPA, Japan, Switzerland|
|Subjects:||H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H57 - Procurement
F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F13 - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F14 - Empirical Studies of Trade
|Depositing User:||Anirudh Shingal|
|Date Deposited:||15. Aug 2011 17:52|
|Last Modified:||01. Mar 2013 18:53|
Alesina, A., N. Roubini & G. Cohen (1997). Political Cycles and the Macroeconomy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bacchetta, P. & E. van Wincoop (2000). 'Does Exchange-Rate Stability Increase Trade and Welfare?' The American Economic Review 90(5): 1093-1109.
Baldwin, R.E. (1970). Non-tariff Distortions of International Trade, Washington, DC: Brookings.
Baldwin, R.E. (1984). 'Trade policies in developed countries,' in Jones, R., Kenen, P. (Eds.), Handbook of International Economics, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
Baldwin, R. & J. Harrigan (2008). ‘Zeroes, Quality and Space: Trade Theory and Trade Evidence,’ NBER Working Paper 13214, March.
Blanchard, O. & J. Wolfers (2000). 'The Role of Shocks and Institutions in the Rise of European Unemployment: The Aggregate Evidence, 1999 Harry Johnson Lecture,' Economic Journal 100, C1-33.
Branco, F. (1994). ‘Favouring Domestic Firms in Procurement Contracts,’ Journal of International Economics 37: 65-80.
Brenton, P. (2001). ‘What are the limits to economic integration?’ Centre for European Policy Studies, Working Document No. 177, November.
Breton, A. & P. Salmon (1995). ‘Are Discriminatory Procurement Policies Motivated by Protectionism?’ Kyklos 49: 47-68.
Burguet, R. & Y. Che (2004). 'Competitive Procurement with Corruption,' The RAND Journal of Economics 35(1): 50-68. Burguet, R. & M. Perry (2000). ‘Bribery and Favouritism by Auctioneers in Sealed Bid Auctions,’ Mimeo, Rutgers University & Institut d'Analisi Economica (CSIC). Chen, X. (1995). ‘Directing Government Procurement as an Incentive of Production,’ Journal of Economic Integration 10: 130-40.
Compte, O., A. Lambert-Mogiliansky & T. Verdier (2005). 'Corruption and Competition in Procurement Auctions,' The RAND Journal of Economics 36(1): 1-15.
Coviello, D. & S. Gagliarducci (2010). ‘Tenure in Office and Public Procurement,’ mimeo.
Cushman, D. O. (1983). 'The Effects of Real Exchange Rate risk on International Trade,' Journal of International Economics 15: 45-63.
Diermeier, D. & A. Merlo (1999). ‘A Structural Model of Government Formation,’ Mimeo, Northwestern University.
Drazen, A. (2000). Political Economy in Macroeconomics, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
European Commission (1997). Single Market Review: Public Procurement. Kogan Page, London.
Evenett, S.J. & A. Shingal (2006). ‘Monitoring Implementation: Japan and the WTO Agreement on Government Procurement,’ in Economic Development & Multilateral Trade Cooperation, The World Bank.
Fukuyama, F (1995). Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, Free Press, New York.
Goldman, E., J. Rocholl & J. So (2009). ‘Political Connections and the Allocation of Procurement Contracts,’ Mimeo.
Helpman, E. (1976). 'Macroeconomic Policy in a Model of International Trade with a Wage Restriction,' International Economic Review 17(2): 262-277.
Helpman, E., M. Melitz & Y. Rubinstein (2008). ‘Estimating Trade Flows: Trading Partners and Trading Volumes,’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 123(2): 441-487.
Hillberry, R. & D. Hummels (2002). ‘Explaining home bias in consumption: The role of intermediate input trade,’ NBER Working Paper 9020.
Hoekman, B. & P. Mavroidis (1997). Law and Policy in Public Purchasing: The WTO Agreement on Government Procurement, University of Michigan Press.
Hyytinen, A., S. Lundberg & O. Toivanen (2009). ‘Politics and Procurement: Evidence from Cleaning Contracts,’ Mimeo.
IMF (various years). International Financial Statistics.
Khorana S. and A. Shingal (2008). ‘Barriers to Government Procurement in the European Union,’ in Strategies and Preparedness for Trade and Globalization in India, UNCTAD (eds.), February.
Laffont, J.J. & J. Tirole (1991).’Auction Design and Favouritism,’ International Journal of Industrial Organization 9: 9-42.
Mastanduno, M. (1991). 'Do relative gains matter? America’s response to Japanese industrial policy,' International Security 16: 73–113.
McAfee, R. P. & J. McMillan (1989). ‘Government Procurement and International Trade,' Journal of International Economics 26: 291-308.
Naegelen, F. & M. Mougeot (1998). 'Discriminatory public procurement policy and cost reduction incentives,' Journal of Public Economics 67: 349–367.
Nicita, A. and M. Olarreaga (2006). 'Trade, Production and Protection 1976-2004,' World Bank Economic Review 21(1).
OECD (various years). STAN database, ‘StatExtracts’ (http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx)
OCED (various years). Trade in Services by Service Category database, ‘StatExtracts’ (http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx).
Persson, T. (2002). 'Do Political Institutions Shape Economic Policy?,' Econometrica 70(3): 883-905.
Persson, T. & G. Tabellini (1990). Macroeconomic Policy, Credibility and Politics, London: Hardwood Academy Publishers.
Persson, T. & G. Tabellini (2000). 'Political Institutions and Economic Policy Outcomes: What Are the Stylized Facts? Mimeo, Institute for International Economic Studies.
Rauch, J (1996). ‘Networks versus Markets in International Trade,’ Working Paper 5617, NBER, Cambridge, MA.
Ravn, M.O., S. Schmitt-Grohé & M. Uribe (2008). ‘Explaining the Effects of Government Spending Shocks on Consumption and the Real Exchange Rate,’ Mimeo.
Rogoff, K. (1990). 'Equilibrium Political Budget Cycles,' American Economic Review 80: 21-36.
Rogoff, K. & A. Silbert (1988). 'Elections and macroeconomic political cycles,' Review of Economic Studies 55: 1-16.
Rose-Ackerman, S. (1975). ‘The Economics of Corruption,’ Journal of Public Economics 4: 187-203.
Rose-Ackerman, S. (1978). Corruption: A Study in Political Economy, New York: Academic Press.
Rothenberg, J. (1993). “Comment” in Jim Leitzel & Jean Tirole eds. Incentives in Procurement Contracting, Boulder: Westview Press.
Santos Silva, J. M. C. and S. Tenreyro (2006). ‘The log of gravity,’ The Review of Economics and Statistics 88 (4): 641- 658.
Schumacher, D. and B. Siliverstovs (2007). ‘Estimating gravity equations: To log or not to log?,’ Discussion Paper 739, German Institute for Economic Research, DIW Berlin, October.
Shi, M. & J. Svensson (2000). 'Conditional Political Business Cycles: Theory and Evidence,' Mimeo, Institute for International Economic Studies.
Shingal, A. (2009). ‘Three Essays on Trade in Services: Exploring tradability, regional trade and government procurement of services,’ unpublished DPhil dissertation, University of Sussex.
Shingal, A. (2011). ‘The WTO's Agreement on Government Procurement: Whither market access?’ World Trade Review, 10:4, 1-23 (in press)/ NCCR Trade Working Paper 2011/02.
Trionfetti, F. (2000). 'Discriminatory public procurement and international trade,' World Economy 23: 57–76.
UNIDO (2010). INDSTAT4 database.
UNSC (2002). ‘GATS, CPC Version 1.1,’ GNS/W/120. (http://unstats.un.org/unsd/statcom/doc02/cpc.pdf)
Vagstad, S. (1995). 'Promoting fair competition in public procurement,' Journal of Public Economics 58: 283–307.
Weichenrieder, J.A. (2001). 'Public procurement in the presence of capital taxation,' Regional Science and Urban Economics 31: 339–353.
World Bank (various years). World Development Indicators.
World Trade Organization (various years). ‘Statistics reports under Article XIX: 5 of the GPA,’ Committee on Government Procurement. (http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/gproc_e/gpstat_e.htm)
Available Versions of this Item
- Foreign market access in government procurement. (deposited 15. Aug 2011 17:52) [Currently Displayed]