Wang, Chen and Caminada, Koen (2011): Disentangling income inequality and the redistributive effect of social transfers and taxes in 36 LIS countries. Forthcoming in:
Download (393kB) | Preview
The aim of this paper is to offer detailed information of fiscal redistribution in 36 countries, employing data that have been computed from the Luxembourg Income Study’s micro-level database. LIS data are detailed enough to allow us to measure both overall redistribution, and the partial effects of redistribution by several taxes or transfers. We elaborate on the work of Jesuit and Mahler (2004) and Mahler and Jesuit (2006), and we refine, update and extent their Fiscal Redistribution approach. LIS data allow us to decompose the trajectory of the Gini coefficient from primary to disposable income inequality in several parts: we will distinguish 11 different benefits and several income taxes and social contributions in our empirical investigation across countries. First, we use LIS data to analyze income inequality and the redistributive effect of social transfers across countries in a descriptive way. Then we proceed with a simulation approach for 36 countries for which we decompose income inequality through several taxes and transfers. We analyze the redistributive effect of several social programs, like unemployment benefits or pensions and income taxes. We develop a budget incidence simulation model to investigate to what extent several social transfers contribute to the overall redistribution in modern welfare states under a strong assumption that the absence of social transfers and taxes would not change individual behavior and labor supply. Among all countries listed in this paper, Denmark and Sweden have the smallest income disparity, while Peru and Colombia have the largest. Nordic countries show the most equally distributed disposable incomes and primary incomes, comparing to the countries in other types of welfare states. On average, large primary income disparity exists in Anglo-Saxon countries. Generally speaking, European countries achieve lower levels of income inequality than other countries. With respect to the redistributive effect, our budget incidence analysis indicates that the pattern is diverse across countries. The largest redistribution is found for Belgium, while Colombia and Peru show rather limited overall redistributive effects. On average, transfers reduce income inequality by over 85 percent, while taxes account for only 15 percent of total redistribution. Among all welfare states, Continental European countries (Belgium, France, Germany, and Luxembourg) achieve the highest level of the reduction of initial income inequality. As far as social programs is concerned, in most countries two dominant income components account for above 50 percent of total reduction in income inequality: the public old age pensions and the survivors scheme, and the income taxes. For example, in Southern European Countries the public old age benefits account for over 80 percent of total redistribution, while these figures are much lower for Anglo-Saxon Countries (20-34%), for Nordic Countries (31-48%), for Continental European Countries (47-57%), and for Central Eastern European Countries (54-70%). In Anglo-Saxon Countries income taxes play a major role (above 30%) compare to other countries (with the exception the United kingdom). Also the redistributive effect of social assistance and child and family benefits in the Anglo-Saxon Countries are relatively high in a comparative setting (9-28%). In Nordic Countries also a variety of other social programs contribute to the reduction of inequality, especially the disability scheme (9-15%). Remarkably, across countries all other social benefit programs seem to have rather limited redistributive effects, although the unemployment compensation benefits do have some effect too.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Disentangling income inequality and the redistributive effect of social transfers and taxes in 36 LIS countries|
|Keywords:||welfare states, social income transfers, inequality, Gini coefficient, LIS|
|Subjects:||H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H55 - Social Security and Public Pensions
H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H53 - Government Expenditures and Welfare Programs
I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare and Poverty > I32 - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty
|Depositing User:||Chen Wang|
|Date Deposited:||16. Aug 2011 11:23|
|Last Modified:||20. Feb 2013 20:14|
Arts W., and J. Gelissen (2002), ‘Three worlds of welfare capitalism or more? A state-of-the-art report’, Journal of European Social Policy 12(2): 137-158.
Atkinson, A.B. (1970), 'On the Measurement of Inequality', Journal of Economic Theory2: 244-263.
Atkinson, A.B. (1979), ‘Horizontal Equity and the Distribution of the Tax Burden’, in: H.J. Aaron and M. J. Boskins (eds.), The Economics of Taxation, Washington: The Brookings Institution: 3-18.
Atkinson, A.B. (1987), ‘On the measurement of poverty’, Econometrica 55(4): 749-764.
Atkinson, A.B. (2000), 'The Changing Distribution of Income: Evidence and Explanation', German Economic Review 1 (1): 3-18.
Atkinson, A.B. (2003), ‘Income Inequality in OECD Countries: Data and Explanations’, CESifo Economic Studies 49(4): 479-513.
Atkinson, A.B. and Brandolini, A. (2001), ‘Promise and Pitfalls in the Use of Secondary Data-Sets: Income Inequality in OECD Countries as a Case Study’, Journal of Economic Literature 39(3) (September): 771-800.
Atkinson, A.B., A. Brandolini, P. van der Laan, and T. Smeeding (2000), 'Producing Time Series Data for Income Distribution: Sources, Methods, and Techniques', Paper prepared for the 26th General Conference of The International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, Cracow, Poland: August 27-September 2, 2000.
Atkinson, A. B., L. Rainwater, and T.M. Smeeding (1995), ‘Income Distribution in OECD Countries: Evidence from the Luxembourg Income Study’, OECD Social Policy Studies 18, Paris.
Behrendt, Ch. (2000), ‘Is there income poverty in Western Europe? Methodological pitfalls in the measurement of poverty in a comparative perspective’, LIS Working Paper Series 258.
Behrendt, Ch. (2002), ‘Holes in the safety net? Social security and the alleviation of poverty in a comparative perspective’, in: R. Sigg and Chr. Behrendt (eds.) Social Security in the Global Village, International Social Security Series, Volume 8, New Brunswick / London: Transaction Publishers: 333-358.
Bonoli, G. (1997), ‘Classifying Welfare States: a Two-dimension Approach’, Journal of Social Policy 26(3): 351-372.
Bradley, D., E. Huber, S. Moller, F. Nielsen, and J. Stephens (2003), ‘Distribution and Redistribution in Postindustrial Democracies’, World Politics 55(2): 193-228.
Brady, D. (2004), ‘The welfare state and relative poverty in rich western democracies, 1967-1997’, LIS Working Paper Series 390.
Brandolini, A., and T.M. Smeeding (2007a), ‘Inequality Patterns in Western-Type Democracies: Cross-Country Differences and Time Changes’, LIS Working Paper Series 458.
Brandolini, A., and T.M. Smeeding (2007b), ‘Inequality: International Evidence’, in: S.N. Durlauf and L.E. Blume (eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan: 1013-1021.
Breen, R., C. García-Peñalosa, and E. Orgiazzi (2008), ‘Factor Components of Inequality: Cross-Country Differences and Time Changes, LIS Working Paper Series 503.
Burniaux, J.-M., T.-T. Dang, D. Fore, M. Förster, M. Mira d’Ercole, and H. Oxley (1998), ‘Income distribution and poverty in selected OECD countries’, OECD Working Papers 189.
Caminada, K., and K.P. Goudswaard (2001), 'International Trends in Income Inequality and Social Policy', International Tax and Public Finance 8(4): 395-415.
Caminada, K., and K.P. Goudswaard (2002), ‘Income Distribution and Social Security in and OECD Perspective’, in: R. Sigg and C. Behrendt (eds.), Social Security in the Global Village, International Social Security Series, Volume 8, Transaction Publishers: New Brunswick/ London: 163-188.
Caminada, C.L.J., and K.P. Goudswaard (2005), 'Are public and private social expenditures complementary?', International Advances in Economic Research 11(2): 175-189.
Caminada, K., and K.P. Goudswaard (2009), 'Effectiveness of Poverty Reduction in the EU15. A Descriptive Analysis.', Poverty & Public Policy 1(2), Article 5: 1-51.
Caminada, K., and K.P. Goudswaard (2010), ‘How well is social expenditure targeted to the poor?', in: P. Saunders and R. Sainsbury (eds.), Social Security, Poverty and Social Exclusion in Rich and Poorer Countries, International Studies on Social Security, volume 16, Mortsel, Belgium: Intersentia: 97-112.
Caminada, K., K.P. Goudswaard and Ferry Koster (2011), 'Social income transfers and poverty: a cross country analysis for OECD countries’, accepted for publication in International Journal of Social Welfare.
Caminada, K., and M. Martin (2011), 'Differences in Anti-Poverty Approaches Between Europe and The United States: A Cross-Atlantic Descriptive Policy Analysis', Poverty & Public Policy, Vol. 3, Issue 2, Article 3: 1-17.
Champernowne, D.G. (1974), 'A Comparison of Measures of Inequality of Income Distribution', Economic Journal 84:787-816.
Coulter, P.B. (1989), Measuring Inequality: A Methodological Handbook, Westview Press, London.
Creedy, J., and J. Ven (2001), ‘Decomposing Redistributive Effects of Taxes and Transfers in Australia: Annual and Lifetime Measures’, Australian Economic Papers 40(2): 185–198.
Dalton, H. (1936), Pinciples of Public Finance, third edition, George Routledge & Sons, London.
Danziger, S., R. Haveman and R. Plotnick (1981), ‘How Income Transfer Programs Affect Work, Savings and Income Distribution: A Critical Assessment’, Journal of Economic Literature 19 (September): 975-1028.
Ervik, R. (1998), 'The Redistributive Aim of Social Policy. A Comparative Analysis of Taxes, Tax Expenditure Transfers and Direct Transfers in Eight Countries', LIS Working Paper Series 184.
Esping-Andersen, G. and Myles, J. (2009), ‘Economic Inequality and the Welfare State’, in: W. Salverda, B. Nolan and T.M. Smeeding (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Economic Inequality, New York: Oxford University Press: 639-664.
Feld, L.P. (1999), ‘Tax competition and income redistribution: An empirical analysis for Switzerland’, Public Choice 105: 125–164.
Ferrarini, T., and K. Nelson (2003) ‘Taxation of Social Insurance and Redistribution: a Comparative Analysis of Ten Welfare States’, Journal of European Social Policy 13(1): 21–33.
Ferrera, M. (1996), ‘The “Southern” Model of Welfare in Social Europe’, Journal of European Social Policy 6(1): 17-37.
Figini, P. (1998), 'Inequality Measures, Equivalence Scales and Adjustment for Household Size and Composition', LIS Working Paper Series 185.
Föster, M. (2000), 'Trend and Driving Factors in Income Distribution and Poverty in the OECD Area', Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Papers no. 42, OECD, Paris.
Förster, M. and Pearson, M. (2002), ‘Income distribution and poverty in the OECD area: trends and driving forces’, OECD Economic Studies, No. 34, 2002/1, Paris: OECD: 7-39.
Förster, M. and Mira d’Ercole, M. (2005), ‘Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries in the Second Half of the 1990s’, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, no. 22.
Frick, J.R., F. Büchel, and P. Krause (2000), in: R. Hauser and I. Becker (eds.) The Personal Distribution of Income in an International Perspective, Berlin, Germany, Springer-Verlag: 176-204.
Fuest, C., J. Niehues, and A. Peichl (2010), ‘The Redistributive Effects of Tax Benefit Systems in the Enlarged EU’, Public Finance Review 38(4): 473-500.
Gillespie, W.I. (1965), 'Effects of Public Expenditures on the Distribution of Income' in: R. Musgrave (eds.) Essays in Fiscal Federalism, The Brookings Institution, Washington.
Gottschalk, P., and T.M. Smeeding (1997), ‘Cross-National Comparisons of Earnings and Income Inequality’, Journal of Economic Literature 35(2): 633-687.
Gottschalk, P., and T.M. Smeeding (1998), 'Empirical Evidence on Income Inequality in Industrialized Countries, LIS Working Paper Series 154 (revised), Luxembourg.
Gottschalk, P., and T.M. Smeeding (2000), ‘Empirical Evidence on Income Inequality in Industrialized Countries’, in: A.B. Atkinson and F. Bourguignon (eds.), Handbook of Income Distribution, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 261-308.
Gottschalk,P., B. Gustafsson, and E. Palmer (eds.) (1997), Changing Patterns in the Distribution of Economic Welfare, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Goudswaard, K.P., and K. Caminada (2010), 'The redistributive effect of public and private social programs: a cross-country empirical analysis', International Social Security Review 63(1): 1-19.
Gustafsson, B., and M. Johansson (1997), 'In Search for a Smoking Gun: What Makes Income Inequality Vary Over Time in Different Countries?', LIS Working Paper Series 172.
Hagenaars, A. and Vos, K. de (1987), ‘The definition and measurement of poverty’, The Journal of Human Resources 23(2), 211-221.
Immervoll, H., H. Levy, Ch. Lietz, D. Mantovani, C.O. Donoghue, H. Sutherland, and G. Verbist (2005), ‘Household incomes and redistribution in the European Union: Quantifying the equalising properties of taxes and benefits’, EUROMOD Working Papers EM9/05.
Jäntti, M. (1997), ‘Inequality in five countries in the 1980s: The role of demographic shifts, markets and government policies’, Economica 64:415-40.
Jenkins, S.P. (1995), ‘Accounting for Inequality Trends: Decomposition Analyses for the UK 1971-86’, Economica 62: 29-63.
Jenkins, S.P. (1999/2010), ‘INEQDECO: Stata module to calculate inequality indices with decomposition by subgroup’, Statistical Software Components S366002, Boston College Department of Economics, revised 19 Apr 2001. [Software available at: http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s366007.html].
Jesuit, D.K., and V.A. Mahler (2010), ‘Comparing Government Redistribution across Countries: The Problem of Second-order Effects’, LIS Working Paper Series 546.
Kakwani, N.C. (1977a), 'Measurement of Tax Progressivity: An International Comparison', Economic Journal 87:71-80.
Kakwani, N.C. (1977b), 'Applications of Lorenz Curves in Economic Analysis', Econometrica 45 (3):719-727.
Kakwani, N. (1986), Analyzing Redistribution Policies: A Study Using Australian Data, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kammer, A., and J. Niehues (2011), ‘Fiscal Redistribution in Modern Welfare States. Dynamic Evidence from Germany and the United Kingdom’, paper presented at the 18th International Research Seminar of the Foundation for International Studies on Social Security, Sigtuna, Sweden.
Kenworthy, L. (2011), ‘Targeting May Not Be So Bad’, in: Progress for the Poor, New York: Oxford University Press, forthcoming.
Kenworthy, L., and J. Pontusson (2005), ‘Rising Inequality and the Politics of Redistribution in Affluent Countries’, LIS Working Paper Series 400.
Kiefer, D.W. (1984), 'Distributional Tax Progressivity Indexes', National Tax Journal 37:497-513.
Kim, H. (2000a), ‘Anti-Poverty Effectiveness of Taxes and Income Transfers in Welfare States’, International Social Security Review 53(4): 105–129.
Kim, H. (2000b), ‘Do welfare states reduce poverty? A critical shortcoming in the standard analysis of the anti-poverty effect of welfare states’, LIS Working Paper Series 233.
Kirchgässner, G., and W. Pommerehne (1996), ‘Tax harmonization and tax competition in the European Union: Lessons from Switzerland’, Journal of Public Economics 60: 351-371.
Korpi, W., and J. Palme (1998), ‘The Paradox of Redistribution and Strategies of Equality: Welfare State Institutions, Inequality, and Poverty in the Western Countries’, American Sociological Review 63: 661-687.
Kristjánsson, A.S. (2011), ‘Governmental Income Redistribution in Iceland. Development and European Comparison’, paper presented at the 18th International Research Seminar of the Foundation for International Studies on Social Security, Sigtuna, Sweden.
Lambert, P.J., R. Nesbakken, and T.O. Thoresen (2010), ‘On the Meaning and Measurement of Redistribution in Cross-Country Comparisons’, LIS Working Paper Series 532.
Lerman, R.I., and S. Yitzhaki (1985), ‘Income Inequality Effects by Income Source: A New Approach and Applications to the United States’, The Review of Economics and Statistics 67(1): 151-156.
Lopez-Feldman, A. (2006), ‘Decomposing inequality and obtaining marginal effects’, The Stata Journal 6(1): 106-111.
LIS (2011), Luxembourg Income, LIS Key Figures and LIS micro datasets, Luxembourg (www.lisproject.org).
Mahler, V.A., and D.K. Jesuit (2006), ‘Fiscal redistribution in the developed countries: new insights from the Luxembourg Income Study’, Socio-Economic Review 4: 483–511.
Marcus, J. and Danziger, S. (2000), ‘Income Poverty in Advanced Countries’, in: A.B. Atkinson, and Bourguignon, F. (eds.), Handbook of Income Distribution, New York: Elsevier-North Holland Publishers: 309-378.
Mitchell, D. (1991), Income Transfers in Ten Welfare States, Aldershot: Avebury.
Moene, K.O., and M. Wallerstein (2003), ‘Earnings Inequality and Welfare Spending: A Disaggregated Analysis’, World Politics 55: 485–516.
Morillas, J.R. (2009), ‘Redistribution as an Income Mobility Process: The Identification and Measurement of Redistribution’, LIS Working Paper Series 513.
Musgrave, R.A., K.E. Case, and H.B. Leonard (1974), 'The Distribution of Fiscal Burdens and Benefits', Public Finance Quarterly 2(July): 259 311.
Musgrave, R.A., and Tun Thin (1948), 'Income Tax Progression, 1929 48', Journal of Political Economy 56: 498 514.
Nell, G. (2005), ‘Prosperity and the welfare state: The effect of benefit generosity and wage coordination on absolute poverty and prosperity in cross-national perspective’ , LIS Working Paper Series 424.
Nolan, B., and I. Marx (2009), ‘Economic Inequality, Poverty, and Social Exclusion’ in: W. Salverda, B. Nolan and T.M. Smeeding (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Economic Inequality, New York: Oxford University Press: 315-341.
O’Higgins, M., G. Schmaus, and G. Stephenson (1990), ‘Income Distribution and Redistribution: A Microdata Analysis for Seven Countries’, in: T. Smeeding , M. O’Higgins and L. Rainwater (eds.), Poverty, Inequality, and Income Distribution in Comparative Perspective, Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead.
OECD (2008), Growing unequal? Income distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries, Paris: OECD.
Palme, M. (1996), ‘Income Distribution Effects of the Swedish 1991 Tax Reform: An Analysis of a Microsimulafion Using Generalized Kakwani Decomposition’, Journal of Policy Modeling18(4): 419-443.
Paul, S. (2004), ‘Income sources effects on inequality’, Journal of Development Economics 73: 435-451.
Plotnick, R. (1984) ‘The Redistributive Impact of Cash Transfers’, Public Finance Quarterly12: 27–50.
Pressman, S. (2009), ‘Public Policies and the Middle Class throughout the World in the Mid 2000s’, LIS Working Paper Series 517.
Pyatt (1976), ‘On the interpretation and disaggregation of Gini coefficients’, The Economic Journal 86(Jun., 1976): 243-255.
Reynolds, M., and E. Smolensky (1977a), Public Expenditures, Taxes and the Distribution of Income: The United States 1950, 1961, 1970, Academic Press, New York.
Reynolds, M., and E. Smolensky (1977b), 'Post Fisc Distributions of Income 1950, 1961, and 1970', Public Finance Quarterly 5:419-438.
Ringen, S. (1991), 'Households, standard of living and inequality', Review of Income and Wealth 37:1-13.
Shorrocks, A.F. (1982), ‘Inequality decomposition by factor components’, Econometrica 50:193-211.
Shorrocks, A.F. (1983), ‘Ranking Income Distributions’, Economica 50(197): 3-17.
Silber, J. (1994), 'Income Distribution, Tax Structure, and the Measurement of Tax Progressivity', Public Finance Quarterly 22 (1):86-102.
Smeeding, T. (2000), 'Changing Income Inequality in OECD Countries: Updated Results from the Luxembourg Income Study (LIS)', in: R. Hauser and I. Becker (eds.) The Personal Distribution of Income in an International Perspective, Berlin, Germany, Springer-Verlag: 205-224.
Smeeding, T.M. (2004), ‘Twenty Years of Research in Income Inequality, Poverty and Redistribution in the Developed World: Introduction and Overview’, Socio-Economic Review 2: 149-163.
Smeeding, T. M. (2005), ‘Public Policy, Economic Inequality, and Poverty: The United States in Comparative Perspective’, Social Science Quarterly 86 (supplement): 955-983.
Smeeding T. (2008), ‘The LIS/LES Project: Overview and Recent Developments’’, LIS Working Paper Series 294.
Smolensky, E., W. Hoyt, and S. Danziger (1987), 'A Critical Survey of Efforts to Measure Budget Incidence' in: H.M. van de Kar, B.L. Wolfe (eds.), The Relevance of Public Finance for Policy-Making, Proceedings IIFP Congress 1985, Detroit:165-179.
Stark, O., J. E. Taylor, and S. Yitzhaki (1986), ‘Remittances and inequality’, Economic Journal 96: 722-740.
Stephens, J.D. (1995), ‘Preserving the Social Democratic Welfare State’, Nordic Journal of Political Economy 22: 143-161.
Swabish, J., T.M. Smeeding, and L. Osberg (2006), ‘Income Distribution and Social Expenditures: A Cross National Perspective’, in: D.B. Papadimitriou (ed.), The Distributional Effects of Government Spending and Taxation, Northampton MA: Edward Elgar Publishing: 247-288.
Whiteford, P. (2008), ‘How much redistribution do governments achieve? The role of cash transfers and household taxes, growing unequal: income distribution and poverty in OECD countries’, in: Growing unequal? Income distribution and poverty in OECD countries, Paris: Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development: 97-121.
Available Versions of this Item
- Disentangling income inequality and the redistributive effect of social transfers and taxes in 36 LIS countries. (deposited 16. Aug 2011 11:23) [Currently Displayed]