The political economy of electricity market liberalization: a cross-country approach

Erdogdu, Erkan (2011): The political economy of electricity market liberalization: a cross-country approach. Published in: Proceedings of 30th USAEE/IAEE North American Conference, 9-12 October 2011, Capital Hilton Hotel, Washington D.C., USA (October 2011)

Abstract

More than half of the countries in the world have introduced a reform process in their power sectors and billions of dollars have been spent on liberalizing electricity markets around the world. Ideological considerations, political composition of governments and educational/professional background of leaders have played and will play a crucial role throughout the reform process. Adapting a political economy perspective, this paper attempts to discover the impact of political economy variables on the liberalization process in electricity markets. Empirical models are developed and analyzed using panel data from 55 developed and developing countries covering the period 1975–2010. The research findings suggest that there is a significant negative relationship between electricity market liberalization and the size of industry sector, meaning that countries with larger industry sectors tend to liberalize less. Also, we detect a negative correlation between polity score and power sector liberalization, that is; it cannot be argued that liberalization policies are stronger in more democratic countries. On the other hand, our results imply that countries that receive foreign financial aid or assistance are more likely to liberalize their electricity markets. In OECD countries, single-party governments accelerate the reform process by reducing public ownership and vertical integration. Moreover, we detect a negative relationship between the years the chief executive has been in office and the reform progress in OECD countries. Furthermore, we identify a decrease in vertical integration in electricity industry during the terms of parties with “right” or “left” ideologies in OECD countries. Additionally, professional and educational background of head of executive branch (prime minister, president and so on) seem to have very significant impact on reform process in OECD countries, but this is not the case in non-OECD countries. Leaders with a professional background as entrepreneurs speed up electricity market liberalization process in OECD countries while those with a background as economists slow it down. As for educational background, the reforms seem to progress slower in OECD countries if the head of executive has an educational background in economics or natural science. As a final point, the study suggests that EU or OECD membership, the existence of electricity market reform idea, population density, electricity consumption, income level, educational level, imports of goods and services (as % of GDP) and country specific features have a strong correlation with liberalization process in electricity markets.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Electric utilities; industrial policy; political economy
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F5 - International Relations and International Political Economy > F59 - International Relations and International Political Economy: Other; L - Industrial Organization > L5 - Regulation and Industrial Policy > L52 - Industrial Policy; Sectoral Planning Methods; L - Industrial Organization > L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities > L94 - Electric Utilities; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Econometric Methods: Multiple; Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables; Endogenous Regressors > C33 - Models with Panel Data

References

Alesina, A., Ardagna, S., Trebbi, F., 2006. Who Adjusts and When? On the Political Economy of Reforms. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series No. 12049

Barro, R., Lee, J.-W., 2010. A New Data Set of Educational Attainment in the World, 1950-2010

Boschini, A.D., 2006. The political economy of industrialisation. European Journal of Political Economy 22, 887-907

Center for Systemic Peace, 2010. Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800-2009. URL http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm

Chang, C.P., Berdiev, A.N., 2011. The political economy of energy regulation in OECD countries. Energy Economics In Press, Corrected Proof

Conway, P., Nicolett, G., 2006. Product Market Regulation in non-manufacturing sectors in OECD countries: measurement and highlights. URL http://www.oecd.org/document/1/0,3746,en_ 2649_34323_2367297_1_1_1_1,00.html

Cubbin, J., Stern, J., 2006. The impact of regulatory governance and privatization on electricity industry generation capacity in developing economies. World Bank Economic Review 20, 115-141

Dreher, A., Lamla, M.J., Lein, S.M., Somogyi, F., 2009. The impact of political leaders' profession and education on reforms. Journal of Comparative Economics 37, 169-193

Duso, T., Seldeslachts, J., 2010. The political economy of mobile telecommunications liberalization: Evidence from the OECD countries. Journal of Comparative Economics 38, 199-216

Duval, R., 2008. Is there a role for macroeconomic policy in fostering structural reforms? Panel evidence from OECD countries over the past two decades. European Journal of Political Economy 24, 491-502

EBRD, 2011. EBRD index of infrastructure reform: Electric power. URL http://www.ebrd.com/ downloads/research/economics/macrodata/tis.xls

Fredriksson, P.G., Wollscheid, J.R., 2008. The political economy of investment: The case of pollution control technology. European Journal of Political Economy 24, 53-72

Gasmi, F., Noumba Um, P., Recuero Virto, L., 2009. Political Accountability and Regulatory Performance in Infrastructure Industries: An Empirical Analysis. The World Bank Economic Review 23, 509-531

Gasmi, F., Recuero Virto, L., 2010. The determinants and impact of telecommunications reforms in developing countries. Journal of Development Economics 93, 275-286

Goldberg, P.K., Pavcnik, N., 2005. Trade, wages, and the political economy of trade protection: evidence from the Colombian trade reforms. Journal of International Economics 66, 75-105

Gratwick, K.N., Eberhard, A., 2008. Demise of the standard model for power sector reform and the emergence of hybrid power markets. Energy Policy 36, 3948-3960

Hogan, W.W., 2002. Electricity Market Restructuring: Reforms of Reforms. Journal of Regulatory Economics 21, 103-132

Huang, Y., 2009. The political economy of financial reform: are Abiad and Mody right? Journal of Applied Econometrics 24, 1207-1213

Ickes, B.W., Ofer, G., 2006. The political economy of structural change in Russia. European Journal of Political Economy 22, 409-434

Jamasb, T., Newbery, D., Pollitt, M., 2004. Core Indicators for Determinants and Performance of Electricity Sector Reform in Developing Countries. In: Cambridge Working Papers in Economics

Keefer, P., 2010. Database of Political Institutions: Changes and Variable Definitions. URL http://go.worldbank.org/2EAGGLRZ40

Kim, B.-Y., Pirttilä, J., 2006. Political constraints and economic reform: Empirical evidence from the post-communist transition in the 1990s. Journal of Comparative Economics 34, 446-466

Li, W., Xu, L.C., 2002. The Political Economy of Privatization and Competition: Cross-Country Evidence from the Telecommunications Sector. Journal of Comparative Economics 30, 439-462

Olper, A., 2007. Land inequality, government ideology and agricultural protection. Food Policy 32, 67-83

UNU-WIDER, 2011. World Income Inequality Database. URL http://www.wider.unu.edu/ research/Database/en_GB/database/

Volscho, T.W., 2007. Unions, government employment, and the political economy of income distribution in metropolitan areas. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 25, 1-12

Wagner, A.F., Schneider, F., Halla, M., 2009. The quality of institutions and satisfaction with democracy in Western Europe -- A panel analysis. European Journal of Political Economy 25, 30-41

Williams, J.H., Ghanadan, R., 2006. Electricity reform in developing and transition countries: A reappraisal. Energy 31, 815-844

World Bank, 2011. World Development Indicators (Edition: April 2011)

Yi-chong, X., 2006. The myth of the single solution: electricity reforms and the World Bank. Energy 31, 802-814